Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Although defined in many ways, organizational culture is usually thought of as the set of assumptions, knowledge, guiding principles, values, mental models, orienting symbols, or interpretations that inform the daily operation of organizations such as corporations, government offices, or voluntary associations. The management theorist Edgar H. Schein asserts that a culture is “(1) a pattern of shared basic assumptions, (2) invented, discovered, or developed by a given group, (3) as it learns to cope with its problems of external adaptation and internal integration, (4) that worked well enough to be considered valid, and, therefore, (5) is to be taught to new members of the group as the (6) correct way to perceive, think, and feel in relation to those problems” (Schein 1991, p. 247). Other scholars conceptualize organizational culture variously as a symbol system, a problem-solving strategy, a collective identity, a system of rewards, a set of meanings, and a way of managing resources, space, and time. Whether a Boy Scout troop with a dozen members, a college with hundreds of students, or a corporation with thousands of employees, an organization develops a more or less distinctive culture. “All the arguments taking place in families, churches and sports clubs are about whether the institution shall draw its group boundary closer, or relax it, apply its rules more strictly, create more rules, or relax them all” (Douglas 1982, p. 5). Organizational culture is one of the outcomes of these negotiations over time. The scholarly interest in organizational culture can be traced to the influence of anthropology, with its focus on cultures, and to organizational sociology, with its attention to the informal organization of groups.

Strong Corporate Cultures

The practical interest in organizational cultures can be traced to management theorists in business and industry, when, in the 1970s, Japanese businesses seemed to be much more successful than their American counterparts. The difference seemed to be found not in technology, marketing, or formal organization, but in the organizational or corporate culture. Japanese businesses seemed to give more attention to creating a culture of commitment to tasks that supported their manufacturing mission. In the United States in the 1980s, management theorists such as Terrence E. Deal and Allan Kennedy began to advocate the development of “strong” cultures, cultures that were consciously reinforced and widely shared (Deal & Kennedy 1982). New employees were to be taught the firm's culture and rewarded for embracing the accepted practice and values of the corporation. These values are often reinforced with stories about the significant episodes in the firm's history, especially concerning adversity overcome by a heroic founder of the organization.

Corporate or organizational cultures are often cited, fairly or unfairly, as one of the major reasons for organizational success or failure. Strong corporate cultures were often thought to be the product of strong leaders, who, by design or trial and error, created corporate structure, values, and procedures that matched his or her management style. These leaders reinforced their values by corporate rites or celebrations—perhaps marking the achievement of a significant goal—that enhanced the solidarity of the employees and underscored the importance of loyalty to the organization. One crucial role of management is to manage the corporate culture, according to some theorists.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading