Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

The U.S. Bureau of the Census defines a household as a “person or group of people who occupy a housing unit” (U.S. Bureau of the Census 2001, p. 2). In the United States as elsewhere, household membership continues to evolve, reflecting social complexities in varied forms. Generally, the states of Florida, California, Texas, and New York are home to more than 31 percent of all households. Regionally, on average, more households were located in the South.

Historically and globally, families have lived in many arrangements depending on cultural practices, family circumstances, and accepted standards. What defines a household? Who lives in a household and under what conditions? Who may return to a household after leaving it? These issues are currently being debated and redefined in the United States. As always, economic climate can affect the formation of households and their stability. The ability to maintain steady income has affected how familial bonds are formed and sustained at any given time in history. In contemporary U.S. society, many definitions that were once commonly understood to some degree are now being reassessed in the midst of cultural flux and technological change. Increasingly, individuals themselves define their household composition and who constitutes their families; members of households often demand to be recognized as such, and bond together for common purposes in various forms of residential preferences. Government agencies are making the shift to recognize various household types.

What was once commonly viewed as the “typical” American household (mother, father, children) might now include unmarried partners, adopted children, stepchildren, foster children, non-relatives, roommates, grandchildren, or parents-in-law. Although still in the majority, from 1990 to 2000, the number of marriedcouple families decreased by a greater percentage than other types—that is, one person nonfamily, two or more people nonfamily, male householders, female householders, and other family household types (U.S. Bureau of the Census 2002). Households headed by women continued to grow, while overall, one in four were singleperson households.

In addition, adult children continue returning home, and parents are becoming grandparents at much younger ages as their children become parents long before they are ready to assume parenting responsibilities.

Residential Patterns

Shifting residential patterns and geographical mobility have undermined the stability of some families, putting survival of households at an even greater risk. Without a substantive support network in the community, neighbors are less inclined to look out for each other. With continuous housing turnover in some communities, residents may not know who legitimately occupies the house next door. Filling the gap to some extent, social institutions such as churches, schools, and community centers are populated with multiple caregivers who benefit parents and guardians in many ways. For example, church members often provide a listening ear, relief from stressful environments, and moral support through challenging situations. These social institutions could further emotionally nurture families as the institutions themselves endure the realities of the economic downturns and are not able to provide the same level of service to families and households as in the past.

Foster Homes

Increased use of the foster care system poses additional challenges to traditional household structures. Problematic situations in which children are often found—due to behavioral problems, substance abuse, parents' inability to care for them, or parental imprisonment, for example—often warrant placing them elsewhere. Such placement may involve several foster families per child over a given time period. This complexity is compounded by the fact that foster care practices vary significantly by community. This system of caring for the young will continue to be transformed. Budgetary concerns in most states, however, affect services to families and households in very complex ways. Too, foster parents' motivations may be mixed, colored by their own needs for self-fulfillment or financial gain. These situations are rarely perfect, but may often serve their purposes in the short run. They certainly add to the variable nature of American households.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading