Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Anthropologist Anthony Cohen has said that “the concept of community has been one of the most compelling and attractive themes in modern social science, and at the same time one of the most elusive to define”” (Cohen 1985, p. 7). The elasticity of the word has proved useful, allowing groups of people to use it in different ways at different times. In recent years, people—and governments—have sought to remedy the alienation of modern life by recreating or achieving a sense of community. Zygmunt Bauman's important work Community: Seeking Safety in an Insecure World gives us a clue as to why the idea has become more important and popular. Bauman argues that as the world becomes more complex and less secure, we seek community to make us feel safer and happier. Bauman notes, however, that community may not always be positive. Sometimes it comes at a price—belonging to a community may risk the loss of our individuality. In seeking security in community in our globalizing world, we may also forgo personal freedom.

Community and Globalization

Paradoxically, as globalization has become more prominent in the last years of the twentieth century and the early years of the twenty-first century, the idea of community has also become more relevant. “Globalization reflects a widespread perception that the world is rapidly being moulded into a shared social space by economic and technological forces … developments in one region of the world have profound consequences for the life chances of individuals or communities on the other side of the globe … the sheer scale of contemporary social and economic change appears to outstrip the capacity of national governments or citizens to control, contest or resist that change”” (Held et al. 1999, p. 1). Political scientist David Held has argued that globalization does not always lead to integration or to the development of progressive, homogeneous, or unified societies. In fact, he argues, globalization may actually encourage disintegrative forces and promote fragmentation in some parts of the world. When this occurs, governments or supranational organizations (such as the European Union, the World Bank, and the United Nations) often invoke policies that they hope will strengthen local communities, particularly in less developed regions of the world. Thus, even as globalization weakens communities, global organizations sometimes seek to strengthen them. As the world has become more homogeneous and global capitalism more dominant, people have sought all the more eagerly for a sense of community, for the reestablishment of the importance of the local. Interestingly, the terrorist attack on New York City's World Trade Center on September 11, 2001, which was interpreted by some as an attack on global capitalism, spurred many Americans to increase their contribution to their local communities and their engagement, in general, with civic society. Robert Putnam, well known for his work on social capital, has shown how the stock of social capital has increased since the terrorist attack.

The Need to Keep It Small

A town needs public squares; they are the largest, most public rooms that the town has. But when they are too large, they look and feel deserted.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading