Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Among the personal and social pursuits of humans, clarifying one's identity (Who am I?) and one's own or group's values (What is important to me individually? To us collectively?) have been among the central themes of intellectual, social, and communicative development. The questions of right action, civic morality, and meaningful relational standards certainly figured prominently in the recorded writings of the early philosophers. Values played a central role in the classical thought and rhetoric of many traditions, whether that of Socrates, Plato, Aristotle, or Augustine around the Mediterranean; Confucius, Mencius, or Lao Tzu in China; the Brahman Vedas, the Upanishads, Lord Mahavira and the Jains, or Siddhartha Buddha in the Indian peninsula; or Zoroaster in Persia. Clarifying human behavior by elucidating the value of certain preferred character or moral traits is a common theme interwoven in the history of human development, a dialogue later continued by political and religious figures from Moses to Jesus to Muhammad to Mahatma Gandhi to Martin Luther King, Jr.

Values are not only espoused by great teachers, but also have often been one of the early starting points for the study of humans and society in many fields. Nearly every branch of the humanities or social science has produced seminal articles discussing the concept of value or approaches to values study as it is applied in that area of research, from economics to environmental science, sociology to semantics, metaphysics to management, cognition to communication. What others believe and hold as important is considered to be a primary influence on their personal behavior and social functioning.

At the same time, each set of social mores-values develop in a specific geographic, economic, historical, political, ethnic and/or religious context, and those local conditions lead localized groupings of people to affirm degrees of divergent values. Though one might ask, “Who am I?” in sorting out one's place within one's respective social schema, questions of “What do I or we find most important?” often only arise when the citizens of one social group are confronted with the striking differences of another social unit. Paraphrasing Blaise Pascal in his Pensees—what truth is on one side of the Pyrenees is error on the other side. Early contact with others is often first mitigated by noting perceived areas of distinct otherness and assigning these to the realm of enduring stereotypes, prejudice, and discrimination—judgments based often on value differentiations.

Early Studies to Identify Cultural Values

Thus an early step in the development of modern cultural anthropology, social psychology, communication studies, and related fields has been to identify the predominant value or value sets of particular peoples. This social-cultural mapping has taken various forms, much of it impressionistic and unsystematic in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, often in the form of foreign observers writing up anecdotal explanations of the differences between various cultures, with titles like a missionary's Chinese Characteristics, a Belgian-Dutch scholar's The English: Are They Human? and a Russian philologist's The National Mind: English, French, German. A variety of synonymous terms such as ethics, spirit, traits, characteristics, social mind, and mores were used until the multivolume ethnographic work of William Issac Thomas and Florian Znaniecki, The Polish Peasant in Europe and American, was published between 1918 and 1920.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading