Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Structuration theory (ST) is identified focally with Anthony Giddens, a British social theorist who was, incidentally, an advisor to Prime Minister Tony Blair and to the financier George Soros. It is a highly influential theory in communication as well as in the social sciences generally. ST was motivated by the long-standing problem of agency and structure in social theory, especially sociology. The dominant sociological contrast of individual versus society led to a basic clash about which determines which—do individuals in interaction construct social meaning and social order or does an evolved or pregiven structure determine and constrain the behavior of its human members? This problem generated another, related conundrum: How can we relate the study of macrosocial entities—societies, the media—to the study of individual relationships and interactive episodes? Most theorists did not take one extreme position or the other, but their integrations were biased and usually conceptually flawed. In communication, the same clash emerged as one between rhetorical scholars emphasizing individual and collective will, skill, and meaning as opposed to social-scientific scholars emphasizing causal-empirical theories about message behavior, response, and outcomes out of the control of individuals and groups. ST is an insightful metatheory with unusual integrative potential that aimed to resolve this dispute.

Although the term structuration was used earlier by such scholars as Georges Gurvitch and Roland Barthes, Giddens really developed the idea as we understand it today. Giddens' intent was to overcome the division in social theory between social constructionists and structural determinists; his synthesis was clear and fecund. Giddens' efforts in the early 1990s addressed the phenomenon of modernity and then moved to a political stance, which he called the third way, a perspective that went avowedly beyond conservatism and leftism.

Basic Concepts

ST is grounded in a distinction among system, structure, and practice. System is a set of normal interchange patterns connecting people, behaviors, messages, relationships, and things, including both human and nonhuman elements. Structure is distinguished from system by being tacit and empowering: It is the domain of rules and resources upon which agents draw in order to act. Rules are principles or routines that can guide or ground actions; resources are anything people can use or adapt to in the course of action. Drawing on social structure, Giddens suggests people are engaged in practice and can engage in specific practices—organized systems of conduct that are meaningful to them.

This distinction leads to the central insight of ST: Structural rules-resources are both produced (used to interact in more or less meaningful and effective ways) and reproduced (maintained or transformed as resources) in the course of all social interaction episodes. This idea of production and reproduction as two sides of the same coin is called by Giddens the duality of structuration. It supplants both the view that macroforces (such as cultures or discourses) can directly explain or ground interaction, and the view of social constructionism that interaction on its own creates order and meaning. ST allows for constraints by language, society, and material reality while recognizing that their effects are conducted through practice and that these enable action and transformation as well.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading