Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

The term sense-making (sensemaking) began to appear in communication-field literatures in the late 1970s. There has been an explosion of usage in the past decade. Although the term is used most often without definition, the term now has significant presence in models and theories of many kinds. Navigating what authors mean by the term involves crossing difficult terrains. With increased attention to communication technology spread into every cranny of life, one finds sense-making references in every field that has turned attention in some way to communication research. Simultaneously, the ways in which interdisciplinary interests have increased in importance has meant that approaches to sense-making from other fields are increasingly being cited. The purpose of this entry is to make sense of sense-making by reviewing origins of these theoretical attentions and distinguishing between the five visible approaches cited in communication-relevant literatures.

Although the terms sense-making (with a hyphen) and sense-making (without a hyphen) are most often used in everyday language interchangeably and without consciousness of potential differences, authors specializing in the focus use the terms consistently in one grammatical form or the other. For purposes in this entry, in general discussions, sense-making will be used. For descriptions of approaches developed within specific research communities, the term of choice in each community will be used.

The Turn to Sense and Sense-Making

The word sense seems so familiar that it is too often assumed to carry with it common understandings. Dictionaries show the term used foundationally to refer to products of human sensory activity—that is, uses of the human senses of sight, hearing, touch, taste, and smell. In these uses, emphasis is placed on human perceptual capacities to sense accurately what is transmitted via the senses. Over time, some definitions have evolved to include terms such as intelligibility, intuitive knowledge, meaning, and natural understanding. These terms focus on more than the products of sensory activity because they refer instead to the interpretations or understandings resulting from cognitive processes rather than focus on perceptually based activities per se.

In the latest evolutions, some authors go further. They emphasize cognitive processes in frameworks that assume sense-making as socially based activity. This evolution focuses on definitions of sensing that may involve the integration of information and inputs from a wide variety of sources over time as well as the making of sense through social interaction.

Finally, some authors, focusing on how sense-makers navigate between their internal worlds and external circumstances, expand the focus to include a broad set of intrapersonal sense-making activities that are assumed to apply to both communicating with self as well as with others. These approaches deliberately move away from the original emphasis on sensing as accurate perception to individual reflection involving not only what is commonly called cognition, but also emotions, intuitions, spiritual hunches, and other ways in which humans are assumed to make sense of their worlds, both internal and external.

These latest evolutions zone in, in different ways depending on authors, on how sensing can be assumed to involve processes of communicative engagement—intrapersonal, interpersonal, group, organizational, and societal. Here one sees a marked move from the original emphases on individual perceptual processes to emphases that begin to redefine sense-making not merely as interpretation, but as dialogue, both internal and external.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading