Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Relational dialectics theory (RDT) is a specific application of the dialogism theory of the 20th century Russian theorist Mikhail Bakhtin. Given the scope of Bakhtin's work, several scholars in a variety of disciplines (including anthropology, communication, film, literature, linguistics, and political science, among others) have made use of dialogism theory in different ways. RDT uses it to help understand how communication constitutes our social, personal, and familial relationships. RDT is an interpretive theory of how communicators create meaning through interaction in relationships. The term dialectics from RDT emphasizes Bakhtin's conception of meaning making as a struggle between competing, or opposing, discourses, what Bakhtin called centripetal-centrifugal struggle. A discourse is a system of meaning, or a somewhat unified way of understanding languageand other expressive forms. Inconsistencies among various discourses, or systems of meaning, can create tensions, even clashes, that challenge communicators within a relationship. We are not talking here about opposing forces such as those in Hegelian dialectics in which thesis leads to antithesis and then to synthesis, but rather the ongoing interplay of clashing discourses. The focus on competing discourses from a dialogic perspective distinguishes RDT from other dialectical perspectives in the study of communication and relationships. RDT was first formally articulated by Leslie Baxter and Barbara Montgomery in their 1996 book, Relating: Dialogues & Dialectics, and a second-generation summary of the theory is Leslie Baxter's in-press book Voicing Relationships.

The Utterance Chain

Central to RDT is Bakhtin's concept of the utterance chain. According to Bakhtin, communication consists of messages that link to other messages like a series of chains, a concept others refer to as intertextuality. Sites of potential struggle occur when the chain of utterances reveals a clash of meaning. Four different sites of potential discursive struggle are common: the distal already-spoken, the proximal already-spoken, the proximal not-yet-spoken, and the distal not-yet-spoken. These struggles are between systems of meaning, not between persons. Thus, discursive struggle is not synonymous with interpersonal conflict, which is a clash between people.

The distal already-spoken is the site of struggle where people in a relationship bump up against culture. According to Bakhtin, culture is not a unitary system of beliefs, but a hotly contested process in which meanings are wrought in the moment of struggle for dominance. RDT-oriented research has identified several cultural discourses affecting relationships such as individualism, community, romance, rationality, the right to silence, and the right to speak one's mind. In the discursive struggle of individualism and community, relationship parties grapple with issues of partner autonomy versus relational connection. In the discursive struggle of the right to silence and the right to speak, relationship parties negotiate issues of openness and closedness. In the discursive struggle of romance and rationality, relationship parties negotiate issues of affection and working on goals as well as issues related to pleasing oneself versus pleasing one's partner. Clearly, the cultural discourses that are brought into the interactions between relating parties will vary from one culture to another, but the discursive site of the distal already-spoken underscores that relating is immersed in culture, which in turn is reproduced or produced anew as relating unfolds.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading