Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Latino perspectives to communication theory have evolved from perspectives that considered the role of racism in the cultural, social, and political marginalization of Latinas/os in the United States to perspectives emphasizing the complexity of identity formation, in particular the roles of border culture, immigration, and transnationalism. In this, Latino perspectives evolve in parallel theoretical and historical axes. In terms of theory, Latino work evolves alongside critical race theory in the United States and accordingly, begins with sociological concerns about marginalization and pays increasing attention to poststructuralist concerns with identity theory. The theoretical broadening echoes the evolution of Latino social movements, which gained strength in the public sphere and academia during the 1960s and 1970s, and have since multiplied in goals, identity perspectives, and social-justice claims. Because theoretical broadening is parallel to social movements and activism and because of its commitment to articulating through theory social-justice claims, the evolution of Latino perspectives is a good example of critical communication theory.

Evolving Perspectives, Evolving Histories

Latino perspectives on communication are engendered by the social situations of the theorists and the social location of Latinas/os at any given time. Early 20th-century work borrowed from the modernist projects of progress hegemonic in the United States. For instance, Emma Tenayuca, an activist and theorist writing during the 1930s and 1940s, put forward an eminently American take on Marxism and culture. Her work attempted to understand the intrinsic ambivalence of being culturally bound to Mexico and yet part of the United States. She argued that the American annexation of the Southwest could be seen as a progressive historical event if Anglo America invested in the modernization and progress of Mexican Americans.

Similar concerns are evident in the work of George I. Sanchez, perhaps the most visible of the Latino theorists of the 1950s. Sanchez was committed to understanding and subverting what he saw was the systematic disenfranchisement of Mexican Americans in the Southwest. In his liberal, modernist proposals, Sanchez argued that the potential of Mexican Americans to become part of mainstream society was tarnished by unjust cultural, educational, and political structures. A strong believer in education, Sanchez argued for equal funding in public schools and for bilingual education. He argued that with the proper schooling, Mexican Americans could become acculturated to the point of joining the rest of U.S. society without losing cultural specificity.

Both Sanchez and Tenayuca placed language and acculturation to Anglo America as central kernels of Latinas/os' prospects for equality. In the 1960s and 1970s, these issues were taken on by Latino theorists such as Americo Paredes and cultural producers like Rodolfo “Corky” Gonzales and Luis Valdez. However, instead of imagining that equality would be the product of linguistic and cultural assimilation, these Latino intellectuals took multiculturalism and bilingualism as social facts that Anglo America would have to accept. Teatro Campesino, initiated by Valdez, was appropriately bilingual, pluri-ethnic, and assumed an audience with equal cultural capital. Paredes's work problematized border life by highlighting the difficulties of intercultural communication because of language, ethnic, and cultural differences between Latinas/os and Anglos in the Southwest.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading