Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

An impression is our image of another person, consisting of the beliefs that we have of that person's characteristics. These characteristics include descriptors for the person's personality (warm, curious), roles (mother, lawyer), physical attributes (red-headed, tall), and normal behaviors (smiles a lot, talks loudly). Impression formation is the psychological process by which impressions are developed. Despite its psychological nature, communication scholars are interested in the impression formation process because it occurs through communication.

This entry focuses on the psychological approach to this topic. Readers should also consider entries that describe impression formation as a strictly communicative process (e.g., uncertainty reduction theory), that concentrate on communicative skill differences (e.g., constructivism), and that consider intentional impression management strategies (e.g., facework) for a full understanding of this topic.

The study of impression formation was inspired by the work of the German Gestalt psychology movement of the 1920s and 1930s. Gestalt psychologists believed that people actively strive to understand the world around them, in contrast with the mostly American learning theorists of that time who conceived of people as responding passively to their environment. The Gestaltists also differed from learning theorists in their interest in human cognitive processes, which probably led impression-formation theorists to ignore emotional factors in favor of the cognitive. One consequence of the Gestaltist legacy is the metaphor of the observer forming an impression as a naïve scientist. This metaphor implies that, just like scientists, we form an impression of a person because we are trying to understand that person, and the formed impression functions as a scientific theory does for a scientist. Scientific theory attempts to describe, explain, and allow for predicting and controlling real-world events. Analogously, an impression provides both a description of a person's behaviors and appearance and an explanation for behaviors and appearance in terms of the person's personality and roles, and it enables one both to predict the behaviors and appearance of the other person in future circumstances and to try to control when and how to interact with that person. The work of two Gestaltists who moved to the United States to escape the Nazi government, Solomon Asch and Fritz Heider, was reflective of the naïve-scientist metaphor and helped define the issues with which impression formation theories have grappled.

During an initial interaction between two people, the cognitive process by which an observer (hereafter known as Ann) forms an impression of a second, target person (Bob) can be modeled as a four-stage process. First, Ann observes Bob's behavior. Second, Ann attributes a cause to that behavior. Third, if Ann interprets that cause as associated with a permanent characteristic of Bob, Ann forms an impression of Bob. Fourth, Ann uses the impression to establish an evaluation of Bob. The following four sections consider each of these stages in turn.

Behavioral Observation

The first stage in impression formation is the observation of behavior. Although the potential exists for anything that people do to influence our impressions of them, behaviors that are unusual, surprising, or viewed negatively are more likely to gain our focus and to influence the impression formation process. Given such focus, there are two substages to behavioral observation: unitizing and labeling. Beginning with the first, behavior occurs in a nonstop stream, so we must divide this stream into manageable units. The size of the unit depends on several factors. One such factor is our knowledge about the observed activity; a novice typist typing the word angry would be likely to divide his or her own behavior into typing an a, then typing an n, and so on, whereas experienced typists would think in terms of the entire word as one unit. A second factor is our goal; research has revealed that observers intending to form an impression of a person tend to divide the person's behavior into larger units than if they are trying to remember that person's actions. Given the same knowledge and goals, people watching the same activity tend to divide it into similarly sized units.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading