Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

I and Thou is the most durable and important conceptual contribution of the 20th-century philosopher of dialogue, Martin Buber, and the title of his most famous book. As often happens with such terms, it became so well known and seemingly accessible that it developed its own reputation as a pop-culture slogan. Self-help gurus and critics alike have used it in ways that surely would have surprised Buber and other Continental philosophers, such as Gabriel Marcel and Hans-Georg Gadamer, who developed similar concepts and applied them in sophisticated ways.

Although it can be mischaracterized and even parodied, I and Thou is not a simplistic exhortation to love your neighbor, to avoid confrontation or conflict, or to be your most honest and genuine self. It is neither an uncritical celebration of subjectivity nor an attack on rationality. Buber was not advocating mystical experience or a near-religious obligation to sustain intimate relationships with people who should be treated as solemn “Thous.” He was creating nothing less than an ontology of, or way of characterizing, communication that could ground the human sciences: “All real living is meeting,” he wrote in I and Thou, in a line that captures its theme. At the center of this ontology was neither the individual self, as I, nor others with whom the individual interacts. Buber focused instead on relationships and relational attitudes—the often forgotten realm of the “between.” This entry briefly discusses Buber's biography, describes the basic I-Thou concept, and explores several relevant implications for communication theory.

Biography and Background

Martin Buber was influential on the world's intellectual stage for more than 6 decades and participated in many of the 20th century's major philosophical, theological, literary, and political controversies. Fluent in nine languages, he had a multifaceted career that involved many roles, including journalist, editor, sociologist, theologian, novelist, translator, political activist, educator, and, although he was at times reluctant to embrace the term, philosopher. He knew and corresponded with many of the century's celebrated intellectuals and was himself intellectually versatile enough to be nominated for Nobel Prizes in both literature and peace.

First published in German in 1923,1 and Thou has been widely translated internationally, but two important English translations exist in an uneasy relationship to each other. The first, by Ronald Gregor Smith, appeared in English in 1937 and has been available in a second revised edition (with a new postscript by Buber) since 1958. The more recent is Walter Kaufmann's 1970 translation, which he claimed made the book clearer and corrected conceptual errors from the previous version. Some scholars prefer Kaufmann's work, which kept the earlier title but in the text revised its central concept to the more familiar, if prosaic, I-You. Others, including Maurice Friedman, Buber's most famous biographer and scholarly commentator, believe Smith's version to be more accurate and to have more engagingly captured the poetic meaning Buber had in mind. Kenneth Paul Kramer quotes from both translations side by side in his readable explication of I and Thou.

I-Thou and I-It

Buber's I-Thou and I-It are what he called “primary words” for understanding human relationships. I-Thou refers to the relational attitude or orientation of regarding the other in his or her concrete uniqueness, as someone capable of full responsiveness to one's own speech. An I-It attitude, on the other hand, primarily regards the other as an object to be dealt with, affected, changed, measured, endured, or understood in role. The hyphenated paired words are “primary” for Buber because the I moves into different forms of being as a result of its relation with elements outside itself. It is impossible, thus, to understand the I apart from its relations, or from the manner in which it is expressed. Although the I-It can be spoken—enacted—with less than one's full presence or being because it refers to the world of things, the I-Thou involves the person's whole being in its address to a mutualized, and mutualizing, person. Buber believed the potential of a dialogic I-Thou attitude distinguished the action of persons from mere individuals whose inclination is persistently toward the world of It—the conceptualization, manipulation, and accumulation of things. There is nothing necessarily wrong or deficient about the It or the I-It attitude. Both the I-Thou and I-It are essential to what Buber called the twofold I and to human life. In fact, Buber indicated realistically that each I-Thou relation, because it so thoroughly involves “whole being” dialogic speech, is by nature transitory and must return to the world of I-It. Treating reality in objectifying ways is not immoral or unethical but normal, natural, and even necessary; defining reality as if it is essentially objectification (measurement, strategy, disseminating facts and opinions to passive audiences) misses the interhuman potential of our existence. Buber was not worried about the existence of the world of I-It; he was worried about the tendency of his era (as surely he would have been of ours) to elevate the It to supreme status.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading