Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

French feminism is the name for a body of philosophical, psychoanalytic, and linguistic theory that cuts across a broad array of related disciplinary interests, including rhetorical and cultural studies, queer theory, poststructuralism, and semiotics. It migrated from France to the United States in the mid-1970s and is relevant to communication studies because it provides a critical framework and set of concepts by which to understand how discourse is sexed. This entry focuses on its background, major concerns, and key critical terms.

Background

Neither distinctively French nor precisely feminist, French feminism is a neologism resulting from the reception, by U.S. American scholars, of Luce Irigaray's, Julia Kristeva's, and Hélène Cixous' work. Although identified with French feminism, none of the three are themselves French nationals: the psychoanalyst, linguistic theorist, and continental philosopher, Irigaray, is Belgian, with a name of Basque origin; the Marxist linguist, novelist, literary critic, and psychoanalyst, Kristeva, is Bulgarian; and the novelist, dramatist, and English literature theorist, Cixous, is a German-speaking Algerian. In addition, none of them self-identify as feminist with respect to French politics.

However, as some of the most formidable contemporary intellectuals (such as Gayatri Spivak, Judith Butler, Kelly Oliver, and Elizabeth Grosz) have engaged Irigaray, Kristeva, and Cixous, moving beyond their initial insights and limits to develop new understandings of the feminine, French feminism has come to refer less to them and more to a kind of theory that most often takes the intersection between language, psychoanalysis, and philosophy as its point of departure. Although its scope has since expanded to include other French intellectuals (such as Simon de Beauvoir, Michèle Le Doeuff, Catherine Clément, Monique Wittig, and Sarah Kofman), this entry will focus only on the work of Irigaray, Kristeva, and Cixous, underscoring a few of the important similarities and differences between them.

Major Concerns

The Feminine and Subjectivity

French feminism's preoccupation has been the question of the feminine and subjectivity—that is, how can the feminine occupy a public space in which she may act beyond the prescriptions and prohibitions of masculine interests and desires? Indeed, how can the feminine know what her own interests and desires are in a culture that has systematically excluded her from the human? How can the feminine even be thought within language structures that do not recognize her?

The Discourse of Western Philosophy

Because Western philosophical discourse shapes all of Western thought, Irigaray's and Cixous' (and Le Doeuff's as well) aim has been to expose a history of the systematic exclusion of the feminine: how philosophical discourse has relegated the feminine to nature and woman to the status of mother and daughter (always as a support for the masculine) while simultaneously allying the masculine to culture and how its use of man, ostensibly standing in for both men and women, actually excludes woman from the human. Much of Irigaray's work demonstrates this ongoing exclusion and rewrites the philosophers in order to open the possibility of the feminine entering into Western thought and coming into her own subjectivity. For example, she critically revisits Plato's account of Diotima's speech and Nietzsche's reliance on the metaphor of solids that is historically allied to the masculine.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading