Entry
Reader's guide
Entries A-Z
Subject index
Women in Community Service Programs
The idea of community service as an alternative sanction to incarceration began in the United States in the 1960s. Since its inception, the community service sanction has spread all over the country and is used for a variety of violations, including, but not limited to, “white-collar” crimes, juvenile delinquency, and other forms of minor crime. Such sanctions are usually withheld from violent offenders, repeat offenders, and the poor. Community service sentences are defined as sentences that mandate work to be performed by offenders for a specific number of hours for public or nonprofit agencies, under the jurisdiction of the court, without pay. In the United States, these sentences, generally ranging from 40 to 240 hours, can stand alone or be used in conjunction with other penalties, such as fines, probation, or incarceration. Conversely, community service sentences in Europe and Asia are generally ordered as alternatives to incarceration and stand alone.
Research has shown that community service can be an effective sanction in terms of lowering recidivism when applied to certain types of offenders in lieu of other punishments. For instance, people who are more educated, white or Asian, and engage in less serious crimes tend to respond to community service orders, recidivating less often compared to other types of offenders. Additionally, evidence shows that issuing community service orders as alternative sanctions can benefit the community by providing unpaid labor and saving money on incarceration costs.
Females and the Community Service Sentence
Beginning in Alameda County, California, in 1966, community service sentences were issued to women who were “driving under the influence” (DUI) offenders. Several reasons for this decision exist. Many of these women were young, poor, first-time offenders with dependents. Unable to pay their monetary fines, these women were winding up in jail. Not wanting to separate these mothers from their children, the courts began to look for an alternative to the traditional DUI sanction (a monetary fine). Community service appeared as a logical alternative. The number of women in prisons and jails has been growing at an exceedingly fast rate. Community service, as an alternative sanction, has become an attractive alternative for female (and male) offenders because of its cost-saving benefits. The use of community service, as an alternative to incarceration, reduces costs, as it does not require the hiring and paying of more wardens, corrections officers, and healthcare professionals needed in order to run and maintain a prison. Furthermore, if offenders with dependents are sentenced to community ser-vice, as opposed to jail, the state does not incur the cost of caring for female offenders' children while their mothers serve an incarceration sentence.
Effectiveness
In terms of gender-differentiated research, no published research studies originating in the United States specifically examine the impact of community service orders on recidivism rates among female offenders. Fortunately, a few research studies in Europe have looked at this area. Overall, research indicates that community service sentences, as an alternative form of punishment, are at least as effective as other forms of punishment, including fines and short-term incarceration sentences. Furthermore, community service sentences appear to have an equivalent, if not a greater, effect in terms of lowering recidivism among offenders, including female offenders. For example, Lena Dominelli, in her examination of all community service sentences ordered in West Yorkshire, England, between 1976 and 1981, found that while male and female offenders were equally likely to complete their community service sentences, female offenders were less likely to recidivate than male offenders.
...
- Actuarial Risk Assessment
- Classification Systems
- COMPASS Program
- Firearms Charges, Offenders With
- Hare Psychopathy Checklist
- Level of Service Inventory
- Offender Needs
- Offender Responsivity
- Offender Risks
- Prediction Instruments
- Predispositional Reports for Juveniles
- Risk and Needs Assessment Instruments
- Risk Assessment Instruments: Three Generations
- Wisconsin Risk Assessment Instrument
- Absconding
- Augustus, John
- Benefit of Clergy
- Boston's Operation Night Light
- Case Management
- Caseload and Workload Standards
- Circle Sentencing
- Conditional Sentencing and Release
- Conditions of Community Corrections
- Continuum of Sanctions
- Crime Control Model of Corrections
- Curfews
- Diversion Programs
- Drug Courts
- Faith-Based Initiatives
- False Negatives and False Positives
- Family Courts
- Family Group Conferencing
- Family Therapy
- Felony Probation
- Field Visits
- Investigative Reports
- Juvenile Probation Officers
- Manhattan Bail Project
- Mediation
- Mental Health Courts
- Neighborhood Probation
- Offender Supervision
- Pre-Sentence Investigation Reports
- Pretrial Detention
- Pretrial Supervision
- Probation
- Probation: Administration Models
- Probation: Early Termination
- Probation: Organization of Services
- Probation: Private
- Probation and Judicial Reprieve
- Probation and Parole: Intensive Supervision
- Probation and Parole Fees
- Probation Mentor Home Program
- Probation Officers
- Probation Officers: Job Stress
- Project Safeway
- Recognizance
- Reparation Boards
- Restorative Justice
- Revocation
- Sanctuary
- Shock Probation
- SMART Partnership
- Specialized Caseload Models
- Teen Courts
- Victim-Offender Reconciliation Programs
- Wilderness Experience
- Attitudes and Myths about Punishment
- Attitudes of Offenders toward Community Corrections
- Bail Reform Act of 1984
- Banishment
- Beccaria, Cesare
- Bentham, Jeremy
- Certified Criminal Justice Professional
- Civil and Political Rights Affected by Conviction
- Community Corrections Acts
- Community Corrections and Sanctions
- Community Corrections as an Add-on to Imprisonment
- Community Corrections as an Alternative to Imprisonment
- Community Partnerships
- Cook County Juvenile Court
- Costs of Community Corrections
- Determinate Sentencing
- Employment-Related Rights of Offenders
- Ethics of Community-Based Sanctions
- Flat Time
- Front-End and Back-End Programming
- Goals and Objectives of Community Corrections
- History of Community Corrections
- Humanitarianism
- Indeterminate Sentencing
- Law Enforcement Administration Act Initiatives
- Long-Term Offender Designation
- Loss of Capacity to Be Bonded
- Loss of Individual Rights
- Loss of Parental Rights
- Loss of Right to Possess Firearms
- Loss of Welfare Benefits
- Net Widening
- Philosophy of Community Corrections
- Political Determinants of Corrections Policy
- President's Task Force on Corrections
- Prison Overcrowding
- Public Opinion of Community Corrections
- Public Safety and Collaborative Prevention
- Punishment
- Punishment Units
- Reducing Prison Populations
- Reintegration into Communities
- Second Chance Act
- Sentencing Guidelines
- Serious and Violent Offender Reentry Initiative
- Split Sentencing and Blended Sentencing
- Temperance Movement
- Three Strikes and You're Out
- Victims of Crime Act of 1984
- Violent Offender Reconciliation Programs
- Volunteers and Community Corrections
- Boot Camps
- Community Service Order
- Community-Based Centers
- Community-Based Vocational Networks
- Day Reporting Centers
- Electronic Monitoring
- Financial Penalties
- Fine Options Programs
- GPS Tracking
- Group Homes
- Halfway Houses and Residential Centers
- Home Confinement and House Arrest
- NIMBY Syndrome
- Probation and Parole: Intensive Supervision
- Residential Correctional Programs
- Residential Programs for Juveniles
- Restitution
- Restitution Centers
- Absconding
- Brockway, Zebulon
- Discretionary Release
- Elmira System
- Firearms and Community Corrections Personnel
- Furloughs
- Good Time and Merit Time
- Graduated Sanctions for Juvenile Offenders
- Irish Marks System
- Maconochie, Alexander
- Pardon and Restoration of Rights
- Parole
- Parole Boards and Hearings
- Parole Commission, U.S.
- Parole Commission Phaseout Act of 1996
- Parole Guidelines Score
- Parole Officers
- Pre-Parole Plan
- Prisoner's Family and Reentry
- Probation and Parole: Intensive Supervision
- Reentry Courts
- Reentry Programs and Initiatives
- Salient Factor Score
- Truth-in-Sentencing Provisions
- Victim Impact Statements
- Work/Study Release Programs
- Addiction-Specific Support Groups
- Correctional Case Managers
- Counseling
- Crime Victims' Concerns
- Cultural Competence
- Disabled Offenders
- Diversity in Community Corrections
- Drug- and Alcohol-Abusing Offenders and Treatment
- Drug Testing in Community Corrections
- Effectiveness of Community Corrections
- Elderly Offenders
- Environmental Crime Prevention
- Evaluation of Programs
- Female Offenders and Special Needs
- Job Satisfaction in Community Corrections
- Juvenile Aftercare
- Juvenile and Youth Offenders
- Liability
- Martinson, Robert
- Motivational Interviewing
- Offenders with Mental Illness
- Public Shaming as Punishment
- Recidivism
- Sex Offender Registration
- Sex Offenders in the Community
- Sexual and Gender Minorities and Special Needs
- Sexual Predators: Civil Commitment
- Therapeutic Communities
- Therapeutic Jurisprudence
- Thinking for a Change
- Victim Services
- “What Works” Approach and Evidence-Based Practices
- Women in Community Service Program
- Loading...
Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL
-
Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
-
Read modern, diverse business cases
-
Explore hundreds of books and reference titles
Sage Recommends
We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.
Have you created a personal profile? Login or create a profile so that you can save clips, playlists and searches