Entry
Reader's guide
Entries A-Z
Subject index
Volunteers and Community Corrections
Although the field of corrections has used volunteers to provide religious counseling and tutoring services for inmates incarcerated in prisons and jails and for offenders under correctional supervision in the community (probation and parole), today there is much more attention to the role of volunteers in reentry and community corrections. Volunteerism involves building strategic alliances, or partnerships, between departments of corrections' probation and parole divisions and community stakeholders. Volunteerism can help county probation officers and state parole agents with goals related to offender reform and community restoration, as long as the purpose and goals of the programs are clear.
In the 1990s, the loss of support for “get tough” crime control policies and practices and the over-reliance on incarceration led to an interest in using community placements as means of helping with offender reintegration. The U.S. Department of Justice is interested in the successful implementation of the reentry and community corrections laws that require day reporting, work release, halfway houses, therapeutic residential programs, probation, parole, and agents of government providing correctional services to work with the community stakeholders to help offenders achieve expectations upon reintegration. Examples include the Kansas Department of Corrections, which works with volunteers to operate the JEHT Foundation's intensive supervision program to help offender reentry; the sex offender management training program developed by Massachusetts in conjunction with the Parole Authority to improve the decision-making process and minimize risk upon release of sex offenders; and work with partners in Ramsey County, Minnesota, to help juveniles become successful during probation. U.S. Department of Justice statistics indicate that 44 to 70 percent of offenders released from incarceration back into the community are rearrested within one to three years. Minority and younger offenders have disproportionately higher recidivism rates. Some believe that community programs and volunteerism are appropriate for nonviolent offenders. Others believe that corrections is sufficiently challenged to meet its mission and goals without including community volunteers. If used correctly, however, volunteers can be an important resource.
Types of Volunteers
Volunteers are typically stakeholders in the community and can include the family, friends, and guardians of offenders, as well as members of civic, faith-based, nonprofit, and private business organizations and even former victims eager to ensure that offenses similar to those they experienced do not occur in the future. Volunteers can advocate for improvements in correctional services and become involved as mentors, tutors, teachers, job trainers, and helpers in drug rehabilitation programs, juvenile courts, and police athletic leagues (PALs). Statistics indicate that in St. Louis, some 17,000 offenders return to the community yearly, and 53 percent are unemployed and return to custody (or recidivate) within a year after release. Private companies work with the probation offices and parole divisions for altruistic reasons—that is, everyone must get a second chance.
Experienced probation and parole officers partner with community volunteers to ensure that safety and security is maintained during the corrections volunteer process.

The U.S. Department of Justice provided funding to states for reentry programs, and there was a volunteer component incorporated into each program. In St. Louis, the departments of corrections developed a model to cross-train probation and parole officers so that they learned special skills to work with private business partners and help the offenders with employment. A position known as case management specialist was created; people in this position are trained to find jobs and work interdependently with employers to hire offenders. Corrections professionals recognize that lack of work and poor literacy are the greatest challenge to the successful reintegration of offenders under correctional supervision in the community.
...
- Actuarial Risk Assessment
- Classification Systems
- COMPASS Program
- Firearms Charges, Offenders With
- Hare Psychopathy Checklist
- Level of Service Inventory
- Offender Needs
- Offender Responsivity
- Offender Risks
- Prediction Instruments
- Predispositional Reports for Juveniles
- Risk and Needs Assessment Instruments
- Risk Assessment Instruments: Three Generations
- Wisconsin Risk Assessment Instrument
- Absconding
- Augustus, John
- Benefit of Clergy
- Boston's Operation Night Light
- Case Management
- Caseload and Workload Standards
- Circle Sentencing
- Conditional Sentencing and Release
- Conditions of Community Corrections
- Continuum of Sanctions
- Crime Control Model of Corrections
- Curfews
- Diversion Programs
- Drug Courts
- Faith-Based Initiatives
- False Negatives and False Positives
- Family Courts
- Family Group Conferencing
- Family Therapy
- Felony Probation
- Field Visits
- Investigative Reports
- Juvenile Probation Officers
- Manhattan Bail Project
- Mediation
- Mental Health Courts
- Neighborhood Probation
- Offender Supervision
- Pre-Sentence Investigation Reports
- Pretrial Detention
- Pretrial Supervision
- Probation
- Probation: Administration Models
- Probation: Early Termination
- Probation: Organization of Services
- Probation: Private
- Probation and Judicial Reprieve
- Probation and Parole: Intensive Supervision
- Probation and Parole Fees
- Probation Mentor Home Program
- Probation Officers
- Probation Officers: Job Stress
- Project Safeway
- Recognizance
- Reparation Boards
- Restorative Justice
- Revocation
- Sanctuary
- Shock Probation
- SMART Partnership
- Specialized Caseload Models
- Teen Courts
- Victim-Offender Reconciliation Programs
- Wilderness Experience
- Attitudes and Myths about Punishment
- Attitudes of Offenders toward Community Corrections
- Bail Reform Act of 1984
- Banishment
- Beccaria, Cesare
- Bentham, Jeremy
- Certified Criminal Justice Professional
- Civil and Political Rights Affected by Conviction
- Community Corrections Acts
- Community Corrections and Sanctions
- Community Corrections as an Add-on to Imprisonment
- Community Corrections as an Alternative to Imprisonment
- Community Partnerships
- Cook County Juvenile Court
- Costs of Community Corrections
- Determinate Sentencing
- Employment-Related Rights of Offenders
- Ethics of Community-Based Sanctions
- Flat Time
- Front-End and Back-End Programming
- Goals and Objectives of Community Corrections
- History of Community Corrections
- Humanitarianism
- Indeterminate Sentencing
- Law Enforcement Administration Act Initiatives
- Long-Term Offender Designation
- Loss of Capacity to Be Bonded
- Loss of Individual Rights
- Loss of Parental Rights
- Loss of Right to Possess Firearms
- Loss of Welfare Benefits
- Net Widening
- Philosophy of Community Corrections
- Political Determinants of Corrections Policy
- President's Task Force on Corrections
- Prison Overcrowding
- Public Opinion of Community Corrections
- Public Safety and Collaborative Prevention
- Punishment
- Punishment Units
- Reducing Prison Populations
- Reintegration into Communities
- Second Chance Act
- Sentencing Guidelines
- Serious and Violent Offender Reentry Initiative
- Split Sentencing and Blended Sentencing
- Temperance Movement
- Three Strikes and You're Out
- Victims of Crime Act of 1984
- Violent Offender Reconciliation Programs
- Volunteers and Community Corrections
- Boot Camps
- Community Service Order
- Community-Based Centers
- Community-Based Vocational Networks
- Day Reporting Centers
- Electronic Monitoring
- Financial Penalties
- Fine Options Programs
- GPS Tracking
- Group Homes
- Halfway Houses and Residential Centers
- Home Confinement and House Arrest
- NIMBY Syndrome
- Probation and Parole: Intensive Supervision
- Residential Correctional Programs
- Residential Programs for Juveniles
- Restitution
- Restitution Centers
- Absconding
- Brockway, Zebulon
- Discretionary Release
- Elmira System
- Firearms and Community Corrections Personnel
- Furloughs
- Good Time and Merit Time
- Graduated Sanctions for Juvenile Offenders
- Irish Marks System
- Maconochie, Alexander
- Pardon and Restoration of Rights
- Parole
- Parole Boards and Hearings
- Parole Commission, U.S.
- Parole Commission Phaseout Act of 1996
- Parole Guidelines Score
- Parole Officers
- Pre-Parole Plan
- Prisoner's Family and Reentry
- Probation and Parole: Intensive Supervision
- Reentry Courts
- Reentry Programs and Initiatives
- Salient Factor Score
- Truth-in-Sentencing Provisions
- Victim Impact Statements
- Work/Study Release Programs
- Addiction-Specific Support Groups
- Correctional Case Managers
- Counseling
- Crime Victims' Concerns
- Cultural Competence
- Disabled Offenders
- Diversity in Community Corrections
- Drug- and Alcohol-Abusing Offenders and Treatment
- Drug Testing in Community Corrections
- Effectiveness of Community Corrections
- Elderly Offenders
- Environmental Crime Prevention
- Evaluation of Programs
- Female Offenders and Special Needs
- Job Satisfaction in Community Corrections
- Juvenile Aftercare
- Juvenile and Youth Offenders
- Liability
- Martinson, Robert
- Motivational Interviewing
- Offenders with Mental Illness
- Public Shaming as Punishment
- Recidivism
- Sex Offender Registration
- Sex Offenders in the Community
- Sexual and Gender Minorities and Special Needs
- Sexual Predators: Civil Commitment
- Therapeutic Communities
- Therapeutic Jurisprudence
- Thinking for a Change
- Victim Services
- “What Works” Approach and Evidence-Based Practices
- Women in Community Service Program
- Loading...
Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL
-
Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
-
Read modern, diverse business cases
-
Explore hundreds of books and reference titles
Sage Recommends
We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.
Have you created a personal profile? Login or create a profile so that you can save clips, playlists and searches