Entry
Reader's guide
Entries A-Z
Subject index
Violent Offender Reconciliation Programs
Violent offender reconciliation programs originate from the restorative justice paradigm and are designed to assist victims of such crimes as murder, armed robbery, homicide, vehicular homicide, and sexual assault. The American criminal justice system is rooted in adversarial interactions, retribution, and the due process rights of criminal defendants. Victims of violent crime may have little or no control over judicial proceedings concerning the crimes perpetrated against them. Rather, the state maintains the power position in the criminal justice system. More precisely, a violent crime is viewed as a violation against the state, and punitive measures are used to address this violation. In contrast, restorative justice makes the victim a priority and is community-centered. Moreover, restorative justice is contingent upon an understanding and appreciation of both shared interests and shared relations. Since the 1970s, victim advocate groups have struggled to meet the needs and protect the rights of victims. Generally, violent offender reconciliation programs are not used in place of the criminal justice system. Rather, these programs are used along with the criminal justice system to directly address and acknowledge the interests of victims. Since the rights of a criminal defendant are of paramount concern in the U.S. judicial system, victims of violent crime often feel ignored, disempowered, and even revictimized by the criminal justice system.
Originally, the vast majority of victim-offender mediation programs primarily accepted cases involving minor assaults and property crimes. However, the success of victim-offender mediation in dealing with nonviolent crimes, as well as growing dissatisfaction with the treatment and role of victims in the criminal justice system, has led to the use of violent offender reconciliation programs. Ideally, as a result of the reconciliation, violent offenders are made aware of and gain an appreciation for the consequences of their actions. Specifically, violent offender reconciliation programs allow offenders to conceptualize the impact of their actions from the intimate perspective of their victims' suffering. Moreover, the process provides victims with the opportunity to comprehend their offenders, as well as the factors that might have served as a catalyst for the offender's violent act.
In most instances, violent offender reconciliations are started with a request from the victim. The offender's participation is voluntary, and either party may terminate the process at any time. Generally, prior to the reconciliation, the offender has admitted his or her guilt. Hence, these programs aspire to foster constructive dialogue between the victim and the offender. During the process, the victim may gain validation via an apology, or the offender may gain forgiveness. An in-depth screening process, which may take up to a year or more, is utilized to confirm that a case is appropriate for a violent offender reconciliation program. The objective of the screening process is to maintain the safety of all parties involved, as well as the integrity of the reconciliation. Additionally, prior to the reconciliation, the mediator meets with each party individually to address questions and concerns. Often in violent offender reconciliation programs, this stage is vital in establishing the parameters of the reconciliation, including particular topics to be discussed. Additionally, this stage is important in addressing and accessing expectations of both parties participating in the reconciliation.
...
- Actuarial Risk Assessment
- Classification Systems
- COMPASS Program
- Firearms Charges, Offenders With
- Hare Psychopathy Checklist
- Level of Service Inventory
- Offender Needs
- Offender Responsivity
- Offender Risks
- Prediction Instruments
- Predispositional Reports for Juveniles
- Risk and Needs Assessment Instruments
- Risk Assessment Instruments: Three Generations
- Wisconsin Risk Assessment Instrument
- Absconding
- Augustus, John
- Benefit of Clergy
- Boston's Operation Night Light
- Case Management
- Caseload and Workload Standards
- Circle Sentencing
- Conditional Sentencing and Release
- Conditions of Community Corrections
- Continuum of Sanctions
- Crime Control Model of Corrections
- Curfews
- Diversion Programs
- Drug Courts
- Faith-Based Initiatives
- False Negatives and False Positives
- Family Courts
- Family Group Conferencing
- Family Therapy
- Felony Probation
- Field Visits
- Investigative Reports
- Juvenile Probation Officers
- Manhattan Bail Project
- Mediation
- Mental Health Courts
- Neighborhood Probation
- Offender Supervision
- Pre-Sentence Investigation Reports
- Pretrial Detention
- Pretrial Supervision
- Probation
- Probation: Administration Models
- Probation: Early Termination
- Probation: Organization of Services
- Probation: Private
- Probation and Judicial Reprieve
- Probation and Parole: Intensive Supervision
- Probation and Parole Fees
- Probation Mentor Home Program
- Probation Officers
- Probation Officers: Job Stress
- Project Safeway
- Recognizance
- Reparation Boards
- Restorative Justice
- Revocation
- Sanctuary
- Shock Probation
- SMART Partnership
- Specialized Caseload Models
- Teen Courts
- Victim-Offender Reconciliation Programs
- Wilderness Experience
- Attitudes and Myths about Punishment
- Attitudes of Offenders toward Community Corrections
- Bail Reform Act of 1984
- Banishment
- Beccaria, Cesare
- Bentham, Jeremy
- Certified Criminal Justice Professional
- Civil and Political Rights Affected by Conviction
- Community Corrections Acts
- Community Corrections and Sanctions
- Community Corrections as an Add-on to Imprisonment
- Community Corrections as an Alternative to Imprisonment
- Community Partnerships
- Cook County Juvenile Court
- Costs of Community Corrections
- Determinate Sentencing
- Employment-Related Rights of Offenders
- Ethics of Community-Based Sanctions
- Flat Time
- Front-End and Back-End Programming
- Goals and Objectives of Community Corrections
- History of Community Corrections
- Humanitarianism
- Indeterminate Sentencing
- Law Enforcement Administration Act Initiatives
- Long-Term Offender Designation
- Loss of Capacity to Be Bonded
- Loss of Individual Rights
- Loss of Parental Rights
- Loss of Right to Possess Firearms
- Loss of Welfare Benefits
- Net Widening
- Philosophy of Community Corrections
- Political Determinants of Corrections Policy
- President's Task Force on Corrections
- Prison Overcrowding
- Public Opinion of Community Corrections
- Public Safety and Collaborative Prevention
- Punishment
- Punishment Units
- Reducing Prison Populations
- Reintegration into Communities
- Second Chance Act
- Sentencing Guidelines
- Serious and Violent Offender Reentry Initiative
- Split Sentencing and Blended Sentencing
- Temperance Movement
- Three Strikes and You're Out
- Victims of Crime Act of 1984
- Violent Offender Reconciliation Programs
- Volunteers and Community Corrections
- Boot Camps
- Community Service Order
- Community-Based Centers
- Community-Based Vocational Networks
- Day Reporting Centers
- Electronic Monitoring
- Financial Penalties
- Fine Options Programs
- GPS Tracking
- Group Homes
- Halfway Houses and Residential Centers
- Home Confinement and House Arrest
- NIMBY Syndrome
- Probation and Parole: Intensive Supervision
- Residential Correctional Programs
- Residential Programs for Juveniles
- Restitution
- Restitution Centers
- Absconding
- Brockway, Zebulon
- Discretionary Release
- Elmira System
- Firearms and Community Corrections Personnel
- Furloughs
- Good Time and Merit Time
- Graduated Sanctions for Juvenile Offenders
- Irish Marks System
- Maconochie, Alexander
- Pardon and Restoration of Rights
- Parole
- Parole Boards and Hearings
- Parole Commission, U.S.
- Parole Commission Phaseout Act of 1996
- Parole Guidelines Score
- Parole Officers
- Pre-Parole Plan
- Prisoner's Family and Reentry
- Probation and Parole: Intensive Supervision
- Reentry Courts
- Reentry Programs and Initiatives
- Salient Factor Score
- Truth-in-Sentencing Provisions
- Victim Impact Statements
- Work/Study Release Programs
- Addiction-Specific Support Groups
- Correctional Case Managers
- Counseling
- Crime Victims' Concerns
- Cultural Competence
- Disabled Offenders
- Diversity in Community Corrections
- Drug- and Alcohol-Abusing Offenders and Treatment
- Drug Testing in Community Corrections
- Effectiveness of Community Corrections
- Elderly Offenders
- Environmental Crime Prevention
- Evaluation of Programs
- Female Offenders and Special Needs
- Job Satisfaction in Community Corrections
- Juvenile Aftercare
- Juvenile and Youth Offenders
- Liability
- Martinson, Robert
- Motivational Interviewing
- Offenders with Mental Illness
- Public Shaming as Punishment
- Recidivism
- Sex Offender Registration
- Sex Offenders in the Community
- Sexual and Gender Minorities and Special Needs
- Sexual Predators: Civil Commitment
- Therapeutic Communities
- Therapeutic Jurisprudence
- Thinking for a Change
- Victim Services
- “What Works” Approach and Evidence-Based Practices
- Women in Community Service Program
- Loading...
Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL
-
Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
-
Read modern, diverse business cases
-
Explore hundreds of books and reference titles
Sage Recommends
We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.
Have you created a personal profile? Login or create a profile so that you can save clips, playlists and searches