Entry
Reader's guide
Entries A-Z
Subject index
Victims of Crime Act of 1984
The Victims of Crime Act of 1984 (VOCA), or federal statute 42 U.S. Code 10601, was passed in 1984 by the U.S. Congress with the backing of citizens and lobby groups. Supporters of the bill held that the current system of criminal adjudication and existing victim compensation programs were inadequate to compensate crime victims. VOCA grew directly out of a congressional task force established in 1982. The act has two main provisions: a Victim Assistance Program and a Victim Notification System. Victim/witness assistance programs offer economic, social, and psychological assistance to victims of crime and those who have witnessed a crime that has caused physical, psychological, or economic injury. The Victim Notification System grants crime victims new rights during the criminal prosecution process. While the main focus is on violent crime, nonviolent felonies and misdemeanors are included in the category of crime.
Victim Assistance and Compensation
Through a federal Crime Victims Fund, established by VOCA, crime victims can now receive restitution in the form of monetary compensation. This fund is a nontaxpayer source of monies that are drawn to finance various programs for adult and child crime victims. (The fund is supported through fines and penalties that convicted federal felons may be required to pay, special assessments collected for certain federal crimes, federal bonds such as bail bonds, any collateral collected, or private donations or gifts made to the fund.) These funds provide compensation to victims of crimes resulting in serious injury and are distributed to victims' compensation programs, which exist in all 50 states. Victim assistance also includes social services for crime victims that include psychological counseling, crisis intervention, mediation and emergency services (such as medical care and shelter), and sometimes legal or paralegal counsel.
Victim Notification
VOCA also has a direct impact on the judicial system. Its mandate of a victim notification system greatly expands the role of crime victims in all stages of the criminal adjudication process. Crime victims now receive notification of a defendant's arrest and initial court appearance, and almost all states require advance notification of all court appearances and notification of proceedings in the prosecution of the accused. Most states also require that a victim be notified if the defendant is released on bail or granted probation or parole. Crime victims are also given a consulting role in plea bargaining and are notified when a plea bargain is struck. Moreover, VOCA grants crime victims the right to testify at sentencing hearings and sometimes allows them to make statements in court. Prior to sentencing, the federal and many state systems now require that the trial judge read a “victim impact statement,” included in the court's pre-sentence report, in which the victim describes how the crime affected his or her physical, mental, and financial health and that of his or her family.
Political Context of VOCA
The granting of special rights to crime victims (which extend beyond the protection the state provides by criminal prosecuting offenders) is a new concept. Calls for victims' rights began in the 1980s with the rise of a national victims' rights movement. The social and political context of the victims' rights movement was the conservative backlash in the late 1970s and 1980s and the government's “war on crime.” The backlash included a directed effort to undo the liberal Warren Court's procedural law revolution, which had expanded the due process rights of defendants.
...
- Actuarial Risk Assessment
- Classification Systems
- COMPASS Program
- Firearms Charges, Offenders With
- Hare Psychopathy Checklist
- Level of Service Inventory
- Offender Needs
- Offender Responsivity
- Offender Risks
- Prediction Instruments
- Predispositional Reports for Juveniles
- Risk and Needs Assessment Instruments
- Risk Assessment Instruments: Three Generations
- Wisconsin Risk Assessment Instrument
- Absconding
- Augustus, John
- Benefit of Clergy
- Boston's Operation Night Light
- Case Management
- Caseload and Workload Standards
- Circle Sentencing
- Conditional Sentencing and Release
- Conditions of Community Corrections
- Continuum of Sanctions
- Crime Control Model of Corrections
- Curfews
- Diversion Programs
- Drug Courts
- Faith-Based Initiatives
- False Negatives and False Positives
- Family Courts
- Family Group Conferencing
- Family Therapy
- Felony Probation
- Field Visits
- Investigative Reports
- Juvenile Probation Officers
- Manhattan Bail Project
- Mediation
- Mental Health Courts
- Neighborhood Probation
- Offender Supervision
- Pre-Sentence Investigation Reports
- Pretrial Detention
- Pretrial Supervision
- Probation
- Probation: Administration Models
- Probation: Early Termination
- Probation: Organization of Services
- Probation: Private
- Probation and Judicial Reprieve
- Probation and Parole: Intensive Supervision
- Probation and Parole Fees
- Probation Mentor Home Program
- Probation Officers
- Probation Officers: Job Stress
- Project Safeway
- Recognizance
- Reparation Boards
- Restorative Justice
- Revocation
- Sanctuary
- Shock Probation
- SMART Partnership
- Specialized Caseload Models
- Teen Courts
- Victim-Offender Reconciliation Programs
- Wilderness Experience
- Attitudes and Myths about Punishment
- Attitudes of Offenders toward Community Corrections
- Bail Reform Act of 1984
- Banishment
- Beccaria, Cesare
- Bentham, Jeremy
- Certified Criminal Justice Professional
- Civil and Political Rights Affected by Conviction
- Community Corrections Acts
- Community Corrections and Sanctions
- Community Corrections as an Add-on to Imprisonment
- Community Corrections as an Alternative to Imprisonment
- Community Partnerships
- Cook County Juvenile Court
- Costs of Community Corrections
- Determinate Sentencing
- Employment-Related Rights of Offenders
- Ethics of Community-Based Sanctions
- Flat Time
- Front-End and Back-End Programming
- Goals and Objectives of Community Corrections
- History of Community Corrections
- Humanitarianism
- Indeterminate Sentencing
- Law Enforcement Administration Act Initiatives
- Long-Term Offender Designation
- Loss of Capacity to Be Bonded
- Loss of Individual Rights
- Loss of Parental Rights
- Loss of Right to Possess Firearms
- Loss of Welfare Benefits
- Net Widening
- Philosophy of Community Corrections
- Political Determinants of Corrections Policy
- President's Task Force on Corrections
- Prison Overcrowding
- Public Opinion of Community Corrections
- Public Safety and Collaborative Prevention
- Punishment
- Punishment Units
- Reducing Prison Populations
- Reintegration into Communities
- Second Chance Act
- Sentencing Guidelines
- Serious and Violent Offender Reentry Initiative
- Split Sentencing and Blended Sentencing
- Temperance Movement
- Three Strikes and You're Out
- Victims of Crime Act of 1984
- Violent Offender Reconciliation Programs
- Volunteers and Community Corrections
- Boot Camps
- Community Service Order
- Community-Based Centers
- Community-Based Vocational Networks
- Day Reporting Centers
- Electronic Monitoring
- Financial Penalties
- Fine Options Programs
- GPS Tracking
- Group Homes
- Halfway Houses and Residential Centers
- Home Confinement and House Arrest
- NIMBY Syndrome
- Probation and Parole: Intensive Supervision
- Residential Correctional Programs
- Residential Programs for Juveniles
- Restitution
- Restitution Centers
- Absconding
- Brockway, Zebulon
- Discretionary Release
- Elmira System
- Firearms and Community Corrections Personnel
- Furloughs
- Good Time and Merit Time
- Graduated Sanctions for Juvenile Offenders
- Irish Marks System
- Maconochie, Alexander
- Pardon and Restoration of Rights
- Parole
- Parole Boards and Hearings
- Parole Commission, U.S.
- Parole Commission Phaseout Act of 1996
- Parole Guidelines Score
- Parole Officers
- Pre-Parole Plan
- Prisoner's Family and Reentry
- Probation and Parole: Intensive Supervision
- Reentry Courts
- Reentry Programs and Initiatives
- Salient Factor Score
- Truth-in-Sentencing Provisions
- Victim Impact Statements
- Work/Study Release Programs
- Addiction-Specific Support Groups
- Correctional Case Managers
- Counseling
- Crime Victims' Concerns
- Cultural Competence
- Disabled Offenders
- Diversity in Community Corrections
- Drug- and Alcohol-Abusing Offenders and Treatment
- Drug Testing in Community Corrections
- Effectiveness of Community Corrections
- Elderly Offenders
- Environmental Crime Prevention
- Evaluation of Programs
- Female Offenders and Special Needs
- Job Satisfaction in Community Corrections
- Juvenile Aftercare
- Juvenile and Youth Offenders
- Liability
- Martinson, Robert
- Motivational Interviewing
- Offenders with Mental Illness
- Public Shaming as Punishment
- Recidivism
- Sex Offender Registration
- Sex Offenders in the Community
- Sexual and Gender Minorities and Special Needs
- Sexual Predators: Civil Commitment
- Therapeutic Communities
- Therapeutic Jurisprudence
- Thinking for a Change
- Victim Services
- “What Works” Approach and Evidence-Based Practices
- Women in Community Service Program
- Loading...
Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL
-
Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
-
Read modern, diverse business cases
-
Explore hundreds of books and reference titles
Sage Recommends
We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.
Have you created a personal profile? Login or create a profile so that you can save clips, playlists and searches