Entry
Reader's guide
Entries A-Z
Subject index
SMART Partnership
With recidivating offenders garnering national media attention, concerns of community safety, and knowledge that supervised offenders are at risk for reoffending, both local police departments and corrections officials are developing methods to enhance the supervision of offenders in the community. In response to such concerns, many cities are beginning to implement strategic plans between police departments and state corrections departments to improve their supervision of these offenders in the community. In 1992, the Redmond Police Department, located in Redmond, Washington, a suburb of Seattle 16 miles to the east, collaborated with the Washington State Department of Corrections in Bellevue, Washington, another east-side suburb, and launched the Supervision, Management, and Recidivist Tracking (SMART) Partnership. The SMART Partnership program had the strategic goal of ensuring the safety of community members through enhanced supervision of offenders.
In 2008, according to the Washington State Department of Corrections (WA DOC), there were 18,623 offenders under some form of incarceration: prison, work release facilities, rented in-state beds, or rented out-of-state beds. The majority of WA DOC offenders are male, and the average age of all offenders under supervision is 36.9 years of age. Additionally, the majority of those who are incarcerated are serving sentences of two to five years, with a five- to 10-year sentence being the second most common time being served by offenders. Moreover, WA DOC reports that their readmission rate is 37 percent.
This recidivism rate is well below that of other states in the nation, which have recidivism rates that fall between 50 and 70 percent. In terms of those under community supervision in King County, the counties in which Redmond and Bellevue are located, WA DOC (2008) reports that there are approximately 14,000 individuals. When these offenders harm the public and government officials in Washington State while under community supervision, the demand by the public for protection from these offenders is high. To help alleviate these concerns over supervised offenders' recidivating, a unique crime-fighting tool, the SMART Partnership, was developed in Washington State.
The SMART Partnership started as a collaboration between Redmond, Washington, police officers and Bellevue, Washington, community corrections officers (CCOs). It was implemented in 1992 to increase the supervision of offenders who reside in, or frequently visit, Redmond. The SMART Partnership program is a two-part program in which police officers and CCOs assist one another in the supervision of offenders under a community corrections sentence.
T. Morgan described the program in a 2002 report in the FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin. In the first part of the SMART program, Redmond police officers assist CCOs in the monitoring of offenders who reside in their patrol areas. In conjunction with WA DOC Bellevue CCOs, Redmond police officers are assigned from one to two offenders to supervise. The CCOs provide the officers with information such as to where the offender resides in Redmond and the conditions of supervision that the offender is required to follow. During routine patrols, the assigned Redmond police officer and a partner may stop by the residence of an offender under supervision once or twice per month to determine if the offender is indeed home during curfew hours. Following the random check-in, the officer documents the visit on a form and provides it to the offender's CCO. If the officer observes any illegal activity, the officer will take normal law-enforcement actions.
...
- Actuarial Risk Assessment
- Classification Systems
- COMPASS Program
- Firearms Charges, Offenders With
- Hare Psychopathy Checklist
- Level of Service Inventory
- Offender Needs
- Offender Responsivity
- Offender Risks
- Prediction Instruments
- Predispositional Reports for Juveniles
- Risk and Needs Assessment Instruments
- Risk Assessment Instruments: Three Generations
- Wisconsin Risk Assessment Instrument
- Absconding
- Augustus, John
- Benefit of Clergy
- Boston's Operation Night Light
- Case Management
- Caseload and Workload Standards
- Circle Sentencing
- Conditional Sentencing and Release
- Conditions of Community Corrections
- Continuum of Sanctions
- Crime Control Model of Corrections
- Curfews
- Diversion Programs
- Drug Courts
- Faith-Based Initiatives
- False Negatives and False Positives
- Family Courts
- Family Group Conferencing
- Family Therapy
- Felony Probation
- Field Visits
- Investigative Reports
- Juvenile Probation Officers
- Manhattan Bail Project
- Mediation
- Mental Health Courts
- Neighborhood Probation
- Offender Supervision
- Pre-Sentence Investigation Reports
- Pretrial Detention
- Pretrial Supervision
- Probation
- Probation: Administration Models
- Probation: Early Termination
- Probation: Organization of Services
- Probation: Private
- Probation and Judicial Reprieve
- Probation and Parole: Intensive Supervision
- Probation and Parole Fees
- Probation Mentor Home Program
- Probation Officers
- Probation Officers: Job Stress
- Project Safeway
- Recognizance
- Reparation Boards
- Restorative Justice
- Revocation
- Sanctuary
- Shock Probation
- SMART Partnership
- Specialized Caseload Models
- Teen Courts
- Victim-Offender Reconciliation Programs
- Wilderness Experience
- Attitudes and Myths about Punishment
- Attitudes of Offenders toward Community Corrections
- Bail Reform Act of 1984
- Banishment
- Beccaria, Cesare
- Bentham, Jeremy
- Certified Criminal Justice Professional
- Civil and Political Rights Affected by Conviction
- Community Corrections Acts
- Community Corrections and Sanctions
- Community Corrections as an Add-on to Imprisonment
- Community Corrections as an Alternative to Imprisonment
- Community Partnerships
- Cook County Juvenile Court
- Costs of Community Corrections
- Determinate Sentencing
- Employment-Related Rights of Offenders
- Ethics of Community-Based Sanctions
- Flat Time
- Front-End and Back-End Programming
- Goals and Objectives of Community Corrections
- History of Community Corrections
- Humanitarianism
- Indeterminate Sentencing
- Law Enforcement Administration Act Initiatives
- Long-Term Offender Designation
- Loss of Capacity to Be Bonded
- Loss of Individual Rights
- Loss of Parental Rights
- Loss of Right to Possess Firearms
- Loss of Welfare Benefits
- Net Widening
- Philosophy of Community Corrections
- Political Determinants of Corrections Policy
- President's Task Force on Corrections
- Prison Overcrowding
- Public Opinion of Community Corrections
- Public Safety and Collaborative Prevention
- Punishment
- Punishment Units
- Reducing Prison Populations
- Reintegration into Communities
- Second Chance Act
- Sentencing Guidelines
- Serious and Violent Offender Reentry Initiative
- Split Sentencing and Blended Sentencing
- Temperance Movement
- Three Strikes and You're Out
- Victims of Crime Act of 1984
- Violent Offender Reconciliation Programs
- Volunteers and Community Corrections
- Boot Camps
- Community Service Order
- Community-Based Centers
- Community-Based Vocational Networks
- Day Reporting Centers
- Electronic Monitoring
- Financial Penalties
- Fine Options Programs
- GPS Tracking
- Group Homes
- Halfway Houses and Residential Centers
- Home Confinement and House Arrest
- NIMBY Syndrome
- Probation and Parole: Intensive Supervision
- Residential Correctional Programs
- Residential Programs for Juveniles
- Restitution
- Restitution Centers
- Absconding
- Brockway, Zebulon
- Discretionary Release
- Elmira System
- Firearms and Community Corrections Personnel
- Furloughs
- Good Time and Merit Time
- Graduated Sanctions for Juvenile Offenders
- Irish Marks System
- Maconochie, Alexander
- Pardon and Restoration of Rights
- Parole
- Parole Boards and Hearings
- Parole Commission, U.S.
- Parole Commission Phaseout Act of 1996
- Parole Guidelines Score
- Parole Officers
- Pre-Parole Plan
- Prisoner's Family and Reentry
- Probation and Parole: Intensive Supervision
- Reentry Courts
- Reentry Programs and Initiatives
- Salient Factor Score
- Truth-in-Sentencing Provisions
- Victim Impact Statements
- Work/Study Release Programs
- Addiction-Specific Support Groups
- Correctional Case Managers
- Counseling
- Crime Victims' Concerns
- Cultural Competence
- Disabled Offenders
- Diversity in Community Corrections
- Drug- and Alcohol-Abusing Offenders and Treatment
- Drug Testing in Community Corrections
- Effectiveness of Community Corrections
- Elderly Offenders
- Environmental Crime Prevention
- Evaluation of Programs
- Female Offenders and Special Needs
- Job Satisfaction in Community Corrections
- Juvenile Aftercare
- Juvenile and Youth Offenders
- Liability
- Martinson, Robert
- Motivational Interviewing
- Offenders with Mental Illness
- Public Shaming as Punishment
- Recidivism
- Sex Offender Registration
- Sex Offenders in the Community
- Sexual and Gender Minorities and Special Needs
- Sexual Predators: Civil Commitment
- Therapeutic Communities
- Therapeutic Jurisprudence
- Thinking for a Change
- Victim Services
- “What Works” Approach and Evidence-Based Practices
- Women in Community Service Program
- Loading...
Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL
-
Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
-
Read modern, diverse business cases
-
Explore hundreds of books and reference titles
Sage Recommends
We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.
Have you created a personal profile? Login or create a profile so that you can save clips, playlists and searches