Entry
Reader's guide
Entries A-Z
Subject index
Sexual and Gender Minorities and Special Needs
Little is known about the impact of corrections on sexual and gender minority (SGM) persons. What is known comes primarily from research on adult males in prison. Learning from the challenges faced by incarcerated SGM persons, conclusions are drawn as to how community corrections may be especially beneficial to these populations.
Differentiating Sexual and Gender Minorities
A person's sexual orientation is to whom a person is emotionally, romantically, and sexually attracted. Gender identity is how a person self-identifies as a particular gender, regardless of physical sex characteristics. Corrections staff do not always recognize the distinction between sexual and gender orientations; some staff see those who identify as transgender as “gay” and vice versa.
Transgenderism describes the situation when a person is born a certain sex anatomically, but identifies, and wishes to live, as a different gender rather than as the sex the person's anatomy dictates. Sometimes, persons who identify as transgender are diagnosed with gender identity disorder (GID), a mental health condition represented by a conflict between a person's physical sex and the gender that person identifies as being. Treatment for GID is guided by the Harry Benjamin Standards of Care. However, some persons who identify as transgender wish to undergo either partial or no medical intervention.
Challenges of SGM Inmates
Both sexual and gender minorities encounter discrimination in the corrections system not only from fellow inmates but also from corrections staff. This discrimination is manifested through unequal treatment, unnecessary segregation, harassment, and violence toward SGM prisoners.
For those who are transgender, the gender-segregated organization of the corrections system is especially problematic. A person who is biologically male but identifies as female is often placed by the courts in a facility that corresponds with the person's anatomy rather than that person's identity. (Although persons who are biologically female but identify as male face a similar problem, there is no research to date on this population in corrections.) Such placement puts a transgender person at greater risk for assault, and the prison system at risk for liability. Transgender female inmates are disproportionately victims of sexual assault. To address this violence, some prisons have placed transgender persons in isolation, which not only does not guarantee protection but also subjects the victim to harsher conditions without due cause.
Some transgender prisoners are not allowed to be referred to by the gender-congruent name they prefer over their birth name because of prison regulations that restrict the use of aliases. The application of this law demonstrates disrespect toward the individual's gender status. Other prisoners are simply referred to by their birth name or pronoun out of disrespect or ignorance on the part of corrections staff.
Persons specifically diagnosed with GID are at risk for being denied proper medical care for their condition. Medical consensus states that persons receiving treatment for GID should continue to receive the Benjamin Standards of Care while incarcerated. However, because of bias, lack of medical expertise, lack of facilities, or a combination of these factors, such medical treatment is rare within the prison system.
Challenges of SGM Juvenile Offenders
SGM youths face discrimination not only from society at large but also directly from their families. Many youths become involved in the court system because of a breakdown in the parent-child relationship. More than one quarter of those who leave their families do so because of conflicts over their sexual orientation, and many become homeless; it is estimated that between 20 and 40 percent of homeless youths do not identify as heterosexual. Given their unstable family and living situations, sexual minority youths may be more likely to commit nonviolent survival crimes.
...
- Actuarial Risk Assessment
- Classification Systems
- COMPASS Program
- Firearms Charges, Offenders With
- Hare Psychopathy Checklist
- Level of Service Inventory
- Offender Needs
- Offender Responsivity
- Offender Risks
- Prediction Instruments
- Predispositional Reports for Juveniles
- Risk and Needs Assessment Instruments
- Risk Assessment Instruments: Three Generations
- Wisconsin Risk Assessment Instrument
- Absconding
- Augustus, John
- Benefit of Clergy
- Boston's Operation Night Light
- Case Management
- Caseload and Workload Standards
- Circle Sentencing
- Conditional Sentencing and Release
- Conditions of Community Corrections
- Continuum of Sanctions
- Crime Control Model of Corrections
- Curfews
- Diversion Programs
- Drug Courts
- Faith-Based Initiatives
- False Negatives and False Positives
- Family Courts
- Family Group Conferencing
- Family Therapy
- Felony Probation
- Field Visits
- Investigative Reports
- Juvenile Probation Officers
- Manhattan Bail Project
- Mediation
- Mental Health Courts
- Neighborhood Probation
- Offender Supervision
- Pre-Sentence Investigation Reports
- Pretrial Detention
- Pretrial Supervision
- Probation
- Probation: Administration Models
- Probation: Early Termination
- Probation: Organization of Services
- Probation: Private
- Probation and Judicial Reprieve
- Probation and Parole: Intensive Supervision
- Probation and Parole Fees
- Probation Mentor Home Program
- Probation Officers
- Probation Officers: Job Stress
- Project Safeway
- Recognizance
- Reparation Boards
- Restorative Justice
- Revocation
- Sanctuary
- Shock Probation
- SMART Partnership
- Specialized Caseload Models
- Teen Courts
- Victim-Offender Reconciliation Programs
- Wilderness Experience
- Attitudes and Myths about Punishment
- Attitudes of Offenders toward Community Corrections
- Bail Reform Act of 1984
- Banishment
- Beccaria, Cesare
- Bentham, Jeremy
- Certified Criminal Justice Professional
- Civil and Political Rights Affected by Conviction
- Community Corrections Acts
- Community Corrections and Sanctions
- Community Corrections as an Add-on to Imprisonment
- Community Corrections as an Alternative to Imprisonment
- Community Partnerships
- Cook County Juvenile Court
- Costs of Community Corrections
- Determinate Sentencing
- Employment-Related Rights of Offenders
- Ethics of Community-Based Sanctions
- Flat Time
- Front-End and Back-End Programming
- Goals and Objectives of Community Corrections
- History of Community Corrections
- Humanitarianism
- Indeterminate Sentencing
- Law Enforcement Administration Act Initiatives
- Long-Term Offender Designation
- Loss of Capacity to Be Bonded
- Loss of Individual Rights
- Loss of Parental Rights
- Loss of Right to Possess Firearms
- Loss of Welfare Benefits
- Net Widening
- Philosophy of Community Corrections
- Political Determinants of Corrections Policy
- President's Task Force on Corrections
- Prison Overcrowding
- Public Opinion of Community Corrections
- Public Safety and Collaborative Prevention
- Punishment
- Punishment Units
- Reducing Prison Populations
- Reintegration into Communities
- Second Chance Act
- Sentencing Guidelines
- Serious and Violent Offender Reentry Initiative
- Split Sentencing and Blended Sentencing
- Temperance Movement
- Three Strikes and You're Out
- Victims of Crime Act of 1984
- Violent Offender Reconciliation Programs
- Volunteers and Community Corrections
- Boot Camps
- Community Service Order
- Community-Based Centers
- Community-Based Vocational Networks
- Day Reporting Centers
- Electronic Monitoring
- Financial Penalties
- Fine Options Programs
- GPS Tracking
- Group Homes
- Halfway Houses and Residential Centers
- Home Confinement and House Arrest
- NIMBY Syndrome
- Probation and Parole: Intensive Supervision
- Residential Correctional Programs
- Residential Programs for Juveniles
- Restitution
- Restitution Centers
- Absconding
- Brockway, Zebulon
- Discretionary Release
- Elmira System
- Firearms and Community Corrections Personnel
- Furloughs
- Good Time and Merit Time
- Graduated Sanctions for Juvenile Offenders
- Irish Marks System
- Maconochie, Alexander
- Pardon and Restoration of Rights
- Parole
- Parole Boards and Hearings
- Parole Commission, U.S.
- Parole Commission Phaseout Act of 1996
- Parole Guidelines Score
- Parole Officers
- Pre-Parole Plan
- Prisoner's Family and Reentry
- Probation and Parole: Intensive Supervision
- Reentry Courts
- Reentry Programs and Initiatives
- Salient Factor Score
- Truth-in-Sentencing Provisions
- Victim Impact Statements
- Work/Study Release Programs
- Addiction-Specific Support Groups
- Correctional Case Managers
- Counseling
- Crime Victims' Concerns
- Cultural Competence
- Disabled Offenders
- Diversity in Community Corrections
- Drug- and Alcohol-Abusing Offenders and Treatment
- Drug Testing in Community Corrections
- Effectiveness of Community Corrections
- Elderly Offenders
- Environmental Crime Prevention
- Evaluation of Programs
- Female Offenders and Special Needs
- Job Satisfaction in Community Corrections
- Juvenile Aftercare
- Juvenile and Youth Offenders
- Liability
- Martinson, Robert
- Motivational Interviewing
- Offenders with Mental Illness
- Public Shaming as Punishment
- Recidivism
- Sex Offender Registration
- Sex Offenders in the Community
- Sexual and Gender Minorities and Special Needs
- Sexual Predators: Civil Commitment
- Therapeutic Communities
- Therapeutic Jurisprudence
- Thinking for a Change
- Victim Services
- “What Works” Approach and Evidence-Based Practices
- Women in Community Service Program
- Loading...
Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL
-
Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
-
Read modern, diverse business cases
-
Explore hundreds of books and reference titles
Sage Recommends
We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.
Have you created a personal profile? Login or create a profile so that you can save clips, playlists and searches