Entry
Reader's guide
Entries A-Z
Subject index
Residential Programs for Juveniles
The juvenile justice system in the United States continues to face the challenge of punishment and accountability of youths who commit crimes, while recognizing the need to operate systems that are designed to change delinquent behaviors. Juvenile residential programs vary throughout the United States, in terms of operational practices, size, facility locations, behavior modification techniques, length of stay, treatment philosophies, use of restraints, and how they measure outcomes. Despite the differences among residential programs across the United States, one common theme is that state systems hold fast to a rehabilitative mission.
Despite the stated mission of rehabilitation, however, the majority of state systems struggle to achieve positive outcomes with youthful offenders. Across the United States, residential programs for juvenile offenders have not shown a significant amount of success and, in many cases participation in a residential program results in an adverse impact on the youth. Programs focusing on discipline and punitive consequences have shown no success in changing the behaviors of young offenders. Typically, these programs instead contribute to further delinquent behaviors, have high recidivism rates, and are plagued by a high incidence of violence.
Successful residential programs for youths have a therapeutic foundation for achieving behavioral change. The components of such therapeutic programs can be identified and implemented so as to change behaviors and thus reduce recidivism rates. A therapeutic program for juvenile offenders consists of the following components: small and nonprisonlike facilities, family engagement, facilities close to the youth's home, safety through supervision and relationships, skill building, and integrated aftercare services.
Small and Nonprison-like Facilities
Juvenile state facilities across the United States are filled with hundreds of youths, with many of those facilities housing 200 or more. Large facilities create the challenges of maintaining safety, meeting the needs of young offenders, engaging families, and implementing treatment modules. Smaller facilities offer the opportunity to work with youths in small groups. Working with a small number of youths contributes to something very critical to the change process. Small groups create an opportunity to build relationships between youth and staff. Relationships are critical to the change process, and since behavioral change is the goal, smaller facilities create greater opportunities for this to occur. Building relationships also creates a safer environment. When the environment is safe, both emotionally and physically, programs have greater potential to achieve change. Small facilities provide the opportunity for staff to get to know the history and experiences of the youths within the facility. Knowing the personal life stories of these young people creates a foundation on which to build relationships. Once relationships are established, the staff is then able to guide youths through the change process.
The environment must support the mission of the agency. If change and growth are the goal of juvenile programs, then the environment must be one that is conducive to therapeutic growth. The environment of residential facilities is not conducive to therapeutic growth; the environment has cells, hard furniture, plain white walls, no carpeting, and no personalized space for youths. It is challenging to build relationships in a stale environment that resembles an adult prison. Therapists deliberately soften the environments in which they engage clients. A softer environment helps a youth relax and become comfortable enough to share significant personal issues. The juvenile residential facility must accomplish the same thing. The environment should consist of carpeted floors, comfortable couches and chairs, colorful walls, ideally youth artwork throughout the living space, and an open living space that promotes safety through supervision and engagement.
...
- Actuarial Risk Assessment
- Classification Systems
- COMPASS Program
- Firearms Charges, Offenders With
- Hare Psychopathy Checklist
- Level of Service Inventory
- Offender Needs
- Offender Responsivity
- Offender Risks
- Prediction Instruments
- Predispositional Reports for Juveniles
- Risk and Needs Assessment Instruments
- Risk Assessment Instruments: Three Generations
- Wisconsin Risk Assessment Instrument
- Absconding
- Augustus, John
- Benefit of Clergy
- Boston's Operation Night Light
- Case Management
- Caseload and Workload Standards
- Circle Sentencing
- Conditional Sentencing and Release
- Conditions of Community Corrections
- Continuum of Sanctions
- Crime Control Model of Corrections
- Curfews
- Diversion Programs
- Drug Courts
- Faith-Based Initiatives
- False Negatives and False Positives
- Family Courts
- Family Group Conferencing
- Family Therapy
- Felony Probation
- Field Visits
- Investigative Reports
- Juvenile Probation Officers
- Manhattan Bail Project
- Mediation
- Mental Health Courts
- Neighborhood Probation
- Offender Supervision
- Pre-Sentence Investigation Reports
- Pretrial Detention
- Pretrial Supervision
- Probation
- Probation: Administration Models
- Probation: Early Termination
- Probation: Organization of Services
- Probation: Private
- Probation and Judicial Reprieve
- Probation and Parole: Intensive Supervision
- Probation and Parole Fees
- Probation Mentor Home Program
- Probation Officers
- Probation Officers: Job Stress
- Project Safeway
- Recognizance
- Reparation Boards
- Restorative Justice
- Revocation
- Sanctuary
- Shock Probation
- SMART Partnership
- Specialized Caseload Models
- Teen Courts
- Victim-Offender Reconciliation Programs
- Wilderness Experience
- Attitudes and Myths about Punishment
- Attitudes of Offenders toward Community Corrections
- Bail Reform Act of 1984
- Banishment
- Beccaria, Cesare
- Bentham, Jeremy
- Certified Criminal Justice Professional
- Civil and Political Rights Affected by Conviction
- Community Corrections Acts
- Community Corrections and Sanctions
- Community Corrections as an Add-on to Imprisonment
- Community Corrections as an Alternative to Imprisonment
- Community Partnerships
- Cook County Juvenile Court
- Costs of Community Corrections
- Determinate Sentencing
- Employment-Related Rights of Offenders
- Ethics of Community-Based Sanctions
- Flat Time
- Front-End and Back-End Programming
- Goals and Objectives of Community Corrections
- History of Community Corrections
- Humanitarianism
- Indeterminate Sentencing
- Law Enforcement Administration Act Initiatives
- Long-Term Offender Designation
- Loss of Capacity to Be Bonded
- Loss of Individual Rights
- Loss of Parental Rights
- Loss of Right to Possess Firearms
- Loss of Welfare Benefits
- Net Widening
- Philosophy of Community Corrections
- Political Determinants of Corrections Policy
- President's Task Force on Corrections
- Prison Overcrowding
- Public Opinion of Community Corrections
- Public Safety and Collaborative Prevention
- Punishment
- Punishment Units
- Reducing Prison Populations
- Reintegration into Communities
- Second Chance Act
- Sentencing Guidelines
- Serious and Violent Offender Reentry Initiative
- Split Sentencing and Blended Sentencing
- Temperance Movement
- Three Strikes and You're Out
- Victims of Crime Act of 1984
- Violent Offender Reconciliation Programs
- Volunteers and Community Corrections
- Boot Camps
- Community Service Order
- Community-Based Centers
- Community-Based Vocational Networks
- Day Reporting Centers
- Electronic Monitoring
- Financial Penalties
- Fine Options Programs
- GPS Tracking
- Group Homes
- Halfway Houses and Residential Centers
- Home Confinement and House Arrest
- NIMBY Syndrome
- Probation and Parole: Intensive Supervision
- Residential Correctional Programs
- Residential Programs for Juveniles
- Restitution
- Restitution Centers
- Absconding
- Brockway, Zebulon
- Discretionary Release
- Elmira System
- Firearms and Community Corrections Personnel
- Furloughs
- Good Time and Merit Time
- Graduated Sanctions for Juvenile Offenders
- Irish Marks System
- Maconochie, Alexander
- Pardon and Restoration of Rights
- Parole
- Parole Boards and Hearings
- Parole Commission, U.S.
- Parole Commission Phaseout Act of 1996
- Parole Guidelines Score
- Parole Officers
- Pre-Parole Plan
- Prisoner's Family and Reentry
- Probation and Parole: Intensive Supervision
- Reentry Courts
- Reentry Programs and Initiatives
- Salient Factor Score
- Truth-in-Sentencing Provisions
- Victim Impact Statements
- Work/Study Release Programs
- Addiction-Specific Support Groups
- Correctional Case Managers
- Counseling
- Crime Victims' Concerns
- Cultural Competence
- Disabled Offenders
- Diversity in Community Corrections
- Drug- and Alcohol-Abusing Offenders and Treatment
- Drug Testing in Community Corrections
- Effectiveness of Community Corrections
- Elderly Offenders
- Environmental Crime Prevention
- Evaluation of Programs
- Female Offenders and Special Needs
- Job Satisfaction in Community Corrections
- Juvenile Aftercare
- Juvenile and Youth Offenders
- Liability
- Martinson, Robert
- Motivational Interviewing
- Offenders with Mental Illness
- Public Shaming as Punishment
- Recidivism
- Sex Offender Registration
- Sex Offenders in the Community
- Sexual and Gender Minorities and Special Needs
- Sexual Predators: Civil Commitment
- Therapeutic Communities
- Therapeutic Jurisprudence
- Thinking for a Change
- Victim Services
- “What Works” Approach and Evidence-Based Practices
- Women in Community Service Program
- Loading...
Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL
-
Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
-
Read modern, diverse business cases
-
Explore hundreds of books and reference titles
Sage Recommends
We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.
Have you created a personal profile? Login or create a profile so that you can save clips, playlists and searches