Entry
Reader's guide
Entries A-Z
Subject index
Public Opinion of Community Corrections
Public opinion is an important consideration for legislators and agency officials when drafting and implementing policies and practices. The “get tough” movement in criminal justice corresponded with a shift in public attitudes during which retributive sentiments increased and support for rehabilitation faded. Support for modern community correctional initiatives exists but varies based on a number of factors. Most people are not supportive of community sanctions for violent criminals yet are highly supportive of community sanctions for nonviolent property offenders. People also consider the extent of property damage and an offender's criminal past when judging the appropriateness of community sanctions. Greater financial loss and longer criminal records reduce support.
The public views community corrections as alleviating part of the burden and costs associated with incarceration. Community sanctions also offer a blend of punishment and rehabilitation that people find appealing. Today, a major public concerns is the large number of people coming out of prison and returning to society. While the public generally supports efforts to help ex-prisoners in the community, this support has limits. Support diminishes substantially when competition develops between securing resources for reentry programs and securing resources for other social initiatives. In addition, people are much less likely to favor reentry programs when program sites are located near their own residences.
Historical Context
Correctional practices in communities date back to some of the earliest civilizations. Crucifixion and throwing criminals into the Coliseum in Rome were early forms of community punishment. In medieval and early modern Europe, a host of corporal-style punishments could be inflicted on criminals. Whippings, hangings, mutilation, the pillory and stocks, and the ducking stool were common and were brought to America with the colonists. While public opinion studies did not develop on corrections until recently, historians report strong favorable reactions to the use of public punishments. Coliseum audiences cheered as they watched “justice” being administered, and crowds would flock to public executions in the Middle Ages to watch their favorite executioners.
As Western societies progressed and the Enlightenment dawned in Europe and America, the allure of public punishment began to fade. Greater sympathy was directed at those receiving punishment and subjected to public humiliation, and suspicions heightened as to whether government authority was being misdirected and abused. In America, Pennsylvania Quakers were instrumental in limiting the use of public punishment as they pushed for the increased use of humane forms of incarceration coupled with hard labor. By the late 1800s, imprisonment, not the various types of public punishment, would become the prominent sanction for serious criminal offenders.
The prison today is viewed as almost inextricably linked to punishment for the worst criminals in society. Since the penitentiary model took root in the 1800s, the American public seemingly has been highly receptive to its use. The United States was in fact the country where the first prison boom occurred. However, while the prison holds an immutable place in the collective American psyche, dissatisfaction with its impact on recidivism and realizations of its limitations as a humane alternative to corporal punishment have surfaced with varying intensity over time. The imperfections of the prison spurred a new age of community corrections, which bears little resemblance to its corporal predecessors. In the mid-1800s, probation and parole appeared and were slowly integrated into American justice. Since the 1990s, community corrections has become multidimensional. No longer is community corrections simply probation and parole. It now covers boot camps, halfway houses, intensive supervised probation (ISP), and house arrest with electronic monitoring, along with a wide variety of community treatment programs.
...
- Actuarial Risk Assessment
- Classification Systems
- COMPASS Program
- Firearms Charges, Offenders With
- Hare Psychopathy Checklist
- Level of Service Inventory
- Offender Needs
- Offender Responsivity
- Offender Risks
- Prediction Instruments
- Predispositional Reports for Juveniles
- Risk and Needs Assessment Instruments
- Risk Assessment Instruments: Three Generations
- Wisconsin Risk Assessment Instrument
- Absconding
- Augustus, John
- Benefit of Clergy
- Boston's Operation Night Light
- Case Management
- Caseload and Workload Standards
- Circle Sentencing
- Conditional Sentencing and Release
- Conditions of Community Corrections
- Continuum of Sanctions
- Crime Control Model of Corrections
- Curfews
- Diversion Programs
- Drug Courts
- Faith-Based Initiatives
- False Negatives and False Positives
- Family Courts
- Family Group Conferencing
- Family Therapy
- Felony Probation
- Field Visits
- Investigative Reports
- Juvenile Probation Officers
- Manhattan Bail Project
- Mediation
- Mental Health Courts
- Neighborhood Probation
- Offender Supervision
- Pre-Sentence Investigation Reports
- Pretrial Detention
- Pretrial Supervision
- Probation
- Probation: Administration Models
- Probation: Early Termination
- Probation: Organization of Services
- Probation: Private
- Probation and Judicial Reprieve
- Probation and Parole: Intensive Supervision
- Probation and Parole Fees
- Probation Mentor Home Program
- Probation Officers
- Probation Officers: Job Stress
- Project Safeway
- Recognizance
- Reparation Boards
- Restorative Justice
- Revocation
- Sanctuary
- Shock Probation
- SMART Partnership
- Specialized Caseload Models
- Teen Courts
- Victim-Offender Reconciliation Programs
- Wilderness Experience
- Attitudes and Myths about Punishment
- Attitudes of Offenders toward Community Corrections
- Bail Reform Act of 1984
- Banishment
- Beccaria, Cesare
- Bentham, Jeremy
- Certified Criminal Justice Professional
- Civil and Political Rights Affected by Conviction
- Community Corrections Acts
- Community Corrections and Sanctions
- Community Corrections as an Add-on to Imprisonment
- Community Corrections as an Alternative to Imprisonment
- Community Partnerships
- Cook County Juvenile Court
- Costs of Community Corrections
- Determinate Sentencing
- Employment-Related Rights of Offenders
- Ethics of Community-Based Sanctions
- Flat Time
- Front-End and Back-End Programming
- Goals and Objectives of Community Corrections
- History of Community Corrections
- Humanitarianism
- Indeterminate Sentencing
- Law Enforcement Administration Act Initiatives
- Long-Term Offender Designation
- Loss of Capacity to Be Bonded
- Loss of Individual Rights
- Loss of Parental Rights
- Loss of Right to Possess Firearms
- Loss of Welfare Benefits
- Net Widening
- Philosophy of Community Corrections
- Political Determinants of Corrections Policy
- President's Task Force on Corrections
- Prison Overcrowding
- Public Opinion of Community Corrections
- Public Safety and Collaborative Prevention
- Punishment
- Punishment Units
- Reducing Prison Populations
- Reintegration into Communities
- Second Chance Act
- Sentencing Guidelines
- Serious and Violent Offender Reentry Initiative
- Split Sentencing and Blended Sentencing
- Temperance Movement
- Three Strikes and You're Out
- Victims of Crime Act of 1984
- Violent Offender Reconciliation Programs
- Volunteers and Community Corrections
- Boot Camps
- Community Service Order
- Community-Based Centers
- Community-Based Vocational Networks
- Day Reporting Centers
- Electronic Monitoring
- Financial Penalties
- Fine Options Programs
- GPS Tracking
- Group Homes
- Halfway Houses and Residential Centers
- Home Confinement and House Arrest
- NIMBY Syndrome
- Probation and Parole: Intensive Supervision
- Residential Correctional Programs
- Residential Programs for Juveniles
- Restitution
- Restitution Centers
- Absconding
- Brockway, Zebulon
- Discretionary Release
- Elmira System
- Firearms and Community Corrections Personnel
- Furloughs
- Good Time and Merit Time
- Graduated Sanctions for Juvenile Offenders
- Irish Marks System
- Maconochie, Alexander
- Pardon and Restoration of Rights
- Parole
- Parole Boards and Hearings
- Parole Commission, U.S.
- Parole Commission Phaseout Act of 1996
- Parole Guidelines Score
- Parole Officers
- Pre-Parole Plan
- Prisoner's Family and Reentry
- Probation and Parole: Intensive Supervision
- Reentry Courts
- Reentry Programs and Initiatives
- Salient Factor Score
- Truth-in-Sentencing Provisions
- Victim Impact Statements
- Work/Study Release Programs
- Addiction-Specific Support Groups
- Correctional Case Managers
- Counseling
- Crime Victims' Concerns
- Cultural Competence
- Disabled Offenders
- Diversity in Community Corrections
- Drug- and Alcohol-Abusing Offenders and Treatment
- Drug Testing in Community Corrections
- Effectiveness of Community Corrections
- Elderly Offenders
- Environmental Crime Prevention
- Evaluation of Programs
- Female Offenders and Special Needs
- Job Satisfaction in Community Corrections
- Juvenile Aftercare
- Juvenile and Youth Offenders
- Liability
- Martinson, Robert
- Motivational Interviewing
- Offenders with Mental Illness
- Public Shaming as Punishment
- Recidivism
- Sex Offender Registration
- Sex Offenders in the Community
- Sexual and Gender Minorities and Special Needs
- Sexual Predators: Civil Commitment
- Therapeutic Communities
- Therapeutic Jurisprudence
- Thinking for a Change
- Victim Services
- “What Works” Approach and Evidence-Based Practices
- Women in Community Service Program
- Loading...
Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL
-
Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
-
Read modern, diverse business cases
-
Explore hundreds of books and reference titles
Sage Recommends
We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.
Have you created a personal profile? Login or create a profile so that you can save clips, playlists and searches