Entry
Reader's guide
Entries A-Z
Subject index
Project Safeway
Project Safeway began in Chicago, Illinois, in the early 1990s and was created through a partnership between the Cook County Adult Probation Department (CCAPD), Treatment Alternatives to Street Crime (TASC), and The Safer Foundation. The program rested on the notion that probation is inherently community-based and should therefore be decentralized to create stronger links among community members, nonprofit agencies, community organizations, and probation. According to N. L. Martin and A. J. Lurigio, one of the main strategies of Project Safeway was to make probation convenient by establishing one-stop community-based reporting centers and building a network of relationships to assist probationers as they began restoring their lives. The program also reduced institutional overcrowding by targeting some drug offenders who were sentenced to periodic incarceration or work release programs. These offenders were released from jail and sentenced to home confinement and probation, according to J. Robinson and Lurigio.
Funding for Project Safeway was procured through a grant from the Chicago Public Housing Authority and federal funding related to the Weed and Seed program. The initial grant was $88,368. Weed and Seed is a federal initiative of the U.S. Department of Justice. The mission of Weed and Seed is to “weed out” violent criminals, drug offenders, and gangs in disorganized neighborhoods while also “seeding” these areas with the necessary resources for economic viability and community efficacy. Project Safeway touched on the “weed” mandate of this philosophical movement through the close community contacts established by probation officers housed in community reporting centers. These relationships provided probation officers with critical information about the adjustment of probationers, information not normally available through mandatory monthly reporting at an office location far from the probationer's community. By developing more intimate relationships with community members and local agencies, probation officers were better able to provide the surveillance needed to “weed out” noncompliant probationers. The primary programmatic focus of Project Safeway, however, was to “seed” these selected communities with services that would then be easily accessible to probationers most in need of them.
Lurigio and Martin note that the community model of community corrections provided the theoretical underpinnings for the development of Project Safeway. This approach, according to P. Wack, embraces the idea that the “community must be given the opportunity to be equal partners in the justice system. Likewise, the community must recognize not only its right to safe streets and homes but also its responsibility for creating them.” Developed during a time when community sentiment throughout the United States demanded more punitive sentencing of offenders, Project Safeway resisted the “get tough” approach to criminal justice, instead focusing on the integral role of the community in treating offenders. Community-based reporting sites facilitated connections and familiarity among probation officers, community members, agencies, churches, schools, and businesses. These relationships allowed officers to develop and coordinate community services integral to the successful rehabilitation of offenders.
According to Leanne Fiftal Alarid and Rolando V. del Carmen, probation is the most widely used sanction in the United States. During the 1990s, as reported by the Chicago Sun-Times, Cook County supervised approximately 35,000 probationers each year. While Chicago comprises approximately 78 identifiable communities, the traditional provision of probation services in Cook County had required probationers to report to the main office, located at 26th Street and California on the South Side of Chicago. In addition to holding the philosophical assumption that probation should be community-based, Project Safeway addressed very practical considerations. The geographic breadth of Chicago in addition to extended periods of inclement weather and the cost of public transportation made reporting a considerable challenge for a significant number of probationers. Project Safeway was organized into three decentralized centers in various Chicago neighborhoods: the Ida B. Wells public housing complex on the South Side, the Near North Side, and the West Side community of Lawndale. Each community in which Project Safeway operated was characterized by a disproportionate percentage of probationers relative to other Chicago communities. The decentralization of these offices allowed probationers easier access to their probation officers, thus facilitating more personal and familiar relationships between clients and providers. The convenience of a neighborhood setting helped probationers feel more comfortable and placed them near other community services that provided counseling for drug and alcohol issues.
...
- Actuarial Risk Assessment
- Classification Systems
- COMPASS Program
- Firearms Charges, Offenders With
- Hare Psychopathy Checklist
- Level of Service Inventory
- Offender Needs
- Offender Responsivity
- Offender Risks
- Prediction Instruments
- Predispositional Reports for Juveniles
- Risk and Needs Assessment Instruments
- Risk Assessment Instruments: Three Generations
- Wisconsin Risk Assessment Instrument
- Absconding
- Augustus, John
- Benefit of Clergy
- Boston's Operation Night Light
- Case Management
- Caseload and Workload Standards
- Circle Sentencing
- Conditional Sentencing and Release
- Conditions of Community Corrections
- Continuum of Sanctions
- Crime Control Model of Corrections
- Curfews
- Diversion Programs
- Drug Courts
- Faith-Based Initiatives
- False Negatives and False Positives
- Family Courts
- Family Group Conferencing
- Family Therapy
- Felony Probation
- Field Visits
- Investigative Reports
- Juvenile Probation Officers
- Manhattan Bail Project
- Mediation
- Mental Health Courts
- Neighborhood Probation
- Offender Supervision
- Pre-Sentence Investigation Reports
- Pretrial Detention
- Pretrial Supervision
- Probation
- Probation: Administration Models
- Probation: Early Termination
- Probation: Organization of Services
- Probation: Private
- Probation and Judicial Reprieve
- Probation and Parole: Intensive Supervision
- Probation and Parole Fees
- Probation Mentor Home Program
- Probation Officers
- Probation Officers: Job Stress
- Project Safeway
- Recognizance
- Reparation Boards
- Restorative Justice
- Revocation
- Sanctuary
- Shock Probation
- SMART Partnership
- Specialized Caseload Models
- Teen Courts
- Victim-Offender Reconciliation Programs
- Wilderness Experience
- Attitudes and Myths about Punishment
- Attitudes of Offenders toward Community Corrections
- Bail Reform Act of 1984
- Banishment
- Beccaria, Cesare
- Bentham, Jeremy
- Certified Criminal Justice Professional
- Civil and Political Rights Affected by Conviction
- Community Corrections Acts
- Community Corrections and Sanctions
- Community Corrections as an Add-on to Imprisonment
- Community Corrections as an Alternative to Imprisonment
- Community Partnerships
- Cook County Juvenile Court
- Costs of Community Corrections
- Determinate Sentencing
- Employment-Related Rights of Offenders
- Ethics of Community-Based Sanctions
- Flat Time
- Front-End and Back-End Programming
- Goals and Objectives of Community Corrections
- History of Community Corrections
- Humanitarianism
- Indeterminate Sentencing
- Law Enforcement Administration Act Initiatives
- Long-Term Offender Designation
- Loss of Capacity to Be Bonded
- Loss of Individual Rights
- Loss of Parental Rights
- Loss of Right to Possess Firearms
- Loss of Welfare Benefits
- Net Widening
- Philosophy of Community Corrections
- Political Determinants of Corrections Policy
- President's Task Force on Corrections
- Prison Overcrowding
- Public Opinion of Community Corrections
- Public Safety and Collaborative Prevention
- Punishment
- Punishment Units
- Reducing Prison Populations
- Reintegration into Communities
- Second Chance Act
- Sentencing Guidelines
- Serious and Violent Offender Reentry Initiative
- Split Sentencing and Blended Sentencing
- Temperance Movement
- Three Strikes and You're Out
- Victims of Crime Act of 1984
- Violent Offender Reconciliation Programs
- Volunteers and Community Corrections
- Boot Camps
- Community Service Order
- Community-Based Centers
- Community-Based Vocational Networks
- Day Reporting Centers
- Electronic Monitoring
- Financial Penalties
- Fine Options Programs
- GPS Tracking
- Group Homes
- Halfway Houses and Residential Centers
- Home Confinement and House Arrest
- NIMBY Syndrome
- Probation and Parole: Intensive Supervision
- Residential Correctional Programs
- Residential Programs for Juveniles
- Restitution
- Restitution Centers
- Absconding
- Brockway, Zebulon
- Discretionary Release
- Elmira System
- Firearms and Community Corrections Personnel
- Furloughs
- Good Time and Merit Time
- Graduated Sanctions for Juvenile Offenders
- Irish Marks System
- Maconochie, Alexander
- Pardon and Restoration of Rights
- Parole
- Parole Boards and Hearings
- Parole Commission, U.S.
- Parole Commission Phaseout Act of 1996
- Parole Guidelines Score
- Parole Officers
- Pre-Parole Plan
- Prisoner's Family and Reentry
- Probation and Parole: Intensive Supervision
- Reentry Courts
- Reentry Programs and Initiatives
- Salient Factor Score
- Truth-in-Sentencing Provisions
- Victim Impact Statements
- Work/Study Release Programs
- Addiction-Specific Support Groups
- Correctional Case Managers
- Counseling
- Crime Victims' Concerns
- Cultural Competence
- Disabled Offenders
- Diversity in Community Corrections
- Drug- and Alcohol-Abusing Offenders and Treatment
- Drug Testing in Community Corrections
- Effectiveness of Community Corrections
- Elderly Offenders
- Environmental Crime Prevention
- Evaluation of Programs
- Female Offenders and Special Needs
- Job Satisfaction in Community Corrections
- Juvenile Aftercare
- Juvenile and Youth Offenders
- Liability
- Martinson, Robert
- Motivational Interviewing
- Offenders with Mental Illness
- Public Shaming as Punishment
- Recidivism
- Sex Offender Registration
- Sex Offenders in the Community
- Sexual and Gender Minorities and Special Needs
- Sexual Predators: Civil Commitment
- Therapeutic Communities
- Therapeutic Jurisprudence
- Thinking for a Change
- Victim Services
- “What Works” Approach and Evidence-Based Practices
- Women in Community Service Program
- Loading...
Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL
-
Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
-
Read modern, diverse business cases
-
Explore hundreds of books and reference titles
Sage Recommends
We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.
Have you created a personal profile? Login or create a profile so that you can save clips, playlists and searches