Entry
Reader's guide
Entries A-Z
Subject index
Probation
Probation is a correctional sentence that allows an offender sentenced in criminal court to remain in the community provided that he or she agrees to abide by certain conditions imposed by the sentencing court. In order to ensure that these conditions are being followed, a probation officer supervises the offender and reports back to the court. Probation can be considered a second chance, in that a person who violates the law, especially if it is a minor offense or a first-time offense, can learn from his or her mistake while remaining in the community. Probation is also increasingly being used for repeat offenders and those convicted of felonies.
History and Mission
John Augustus is known as the father of probation. In 1841, Augustus began bailing men out of jail in Boston, Massachusetts. He bailed out those who were first-time offenders and who expressed a willingness to reform. By 1842, Augustus expanded his informal probation efforts to women and children. Augustus assisted his charges in abstaining from alcohol, finding homes, securing employment, and dealing with family strife. He was not paid for his services, but did receive donations from local businesses and individuals who believed in his efforts. Enactment of the first probation law in the United States took place in Massachusetts in 1878. This law provided for paid probation officers to supervise both adults and juveniles. It was deemed a success, and similar programs began to develop throughout the United States.
The probation officer is charged with enforcing the conditions imposed by the court. Probation officers need a broad knowledge of the criminal justice system and an understanding of the distribution of responsibilities among courts, the parole authority, corrections facilities, social services, and the prosecutor.

President Calvin Coolidge signed the Probation Act of 1925, which established probation as an actual sentence in the federal court system. Prior to the signing of this act, federal courts used suspension of sentences as a conditional means of lessening punishment. In 1916, the Supreme Court held that federal courts did not have the power to suspend sentences indefinitely. The Probation Act of 1925 allowed courts to place offenders on probation for a term and under the conditions the court thought would best suit the offender and his or her needs.
By 1956, all forty-eight states had paid probation departments for adults and juveniles, and today probation is the primary sanction for criminal offenders in the United States. As of 2008, there were more than 4 million adults on probation. About half of all people are placed on probation for misdemeanor offenses; the other half are serving a term of probation because of felony convictions.
The mission of probation is to carry out what is known as the trinity. The trinity involves protecting the public, carrying out the orders of the court, and providing rehabilitation and treatment. Protection of the public is accomplished through activities such as random home visits, drug tests, notification to victims, and verification of sex offender registration. The supervising probation officer carries out the orders of the court by ensuring the offender pays his or her restitution, fines, and fees. In addition, it is the duty of the probation officer to enforce all other conditions imposed by the court. This will include all of the mandatory and standard conditions of supervision as well as the conditions specific to a particular offender. Finally, the supervising probation officer is charged with providing treatment and rehabilitation for offenders. This may entail chemical dependency treatment, mental health services, furtherance of education, vocational training, and financial assistance, depending on a specific offender's issues and needs.
...
- Actuarial Risk Assessment
- Classification Systems
- COMPASS Program
- Firearms Charges, Offenders With
- Hare Psychopathy Checklist
- Level of Service Inventory
- Offender Needs
- Offender Responsivity
- Offender Risks
- Prediction Instruments
- Predispositional Reports for Juveniles
- Risk and Needs Assessment Instruments
- Risk Assessment Instruments: Three Generations
- Wisconsin Risk Assessment Instrument
- Absconding
- Augustus, John
- Benefit of Clergy
- Boston's Operation Night Light
- Case Management
- Caseload and Workload Standards
- Circle Sentencing
- Conditional Sentencing and Release
- Conditions of Community Corrections
- Continuum of Sanctions
- Crime Control Model of Corrections
- Curfews
- Diversion Programs
- Drug Courts
- Faith-Based Initiatives
- False Negatives and False Positives
- Family Courts
- Family Group Conferencing
- Family Therapy
- Felony Probation
- Field Visits
- Investigative Reports
- Juvenile Probation Officers
- Manhattan Bail Project
- Mediation
- Mental Health Courts
- Neighborhood Probation
- Offender Supervision
- Pre-Sentence Investigation Reports
- Pretrial Detention
- Pretrial Supervision
- Probation
- Probation: Administration Models
- Probation: Early Termination
- Probation: Organization of Services
- Probation: Private
- Probation and Judicial Reprieve
- Probation and Parole: Intensive Supervision
- Probation and Parole Fees
- Probation Mentor Home Program
- Probation Officers
- Probation Officers: Job Stress
- Project Safeway
- Recognizance
- Reparation Boards
- Restorative Justice
- Revocation
- Sanctuary
- Shock Probation
- SMART Partnership
- Specialized Caseload Models
- Teen Courts
- Victim-Offender Reconciliation Programs
- Wilderness Experience
- Attitudes and Myths about Punishment
- Attitudes of Offenders toward Community Corrections
- Bail Reform Act of 1984
- Banishment
- Beccaria, Cesare
- Bentham, Jeremy
- Certified Criminal Justice Professional
- Civil and Political Rights Affected by Conviction
- Community Corrections Acts
- Community Corrections and Sanctions
- Community Corrections as an Add-on to Imprisonment
- Community Corrections as an Alternative to Imprisonment
- Community Partnerships
- Cook County Juvenile Court
- Costs of Community Corrections
- Determinate Sentencing
- Employment-Related Rights of Offenders
- Ethics of Community-Based Sanctions
- Flat Time
- Front-End and Back-End Programming
- Goals and Objectives of Community Corrections
- History of Community Corrections
- Humanitarianism
- Indeterminate Sentencing
- Law Enforcement Administration Act Initiatives
- Long-Term Offender Designation
- Loss of Capacity to Be Bonded
- Loss of Individual Rights
- Loss of Parental Rights
- Loss of Right to Possess Firearms
- Loss of Welfare Benefits
- Net Widening
- Philosophy of Community Corrections
- Political Determinants of Corrections Policy
- President's Task Force on Corrections
- Prison Overcrowding
- Public Opinion of Community Corrections
- Public Safety and Collaborative Prevention
- Punishment
- Punishment Units
- Reducing Prison Populations
- Reintegration into Communities
- Second Chance Act
- Sentencing Guidelines
- Serious and Violent Offender Reentry Initiative
- Split Sentencing and Blended Sentencing
- Temperance Movement
- Three Strikes and You're Out
- Victims of Crime Act of 1984
- Violent Offender Reconciliation Programs
- Volunteers and Community Corrections
- Boot Camps
- Community Service Order
- Community-Based Centers
- Community-Based Vocational Networks
- Day Reporting Centers
- Electronic Monitoring
- Financial Penalties
- Fine Options Programs
- GPS Tracking
- Group Homes
- Halfway Houses and Residential Centers
- Home Confinement and House Arrest
- NIMBY Syndrome
- Probation and Parole: Intensive Supervision
- Residential Correctional Programs
- Residential Programs for Juveniles
- Restitution
- Restitution Centers
- Absconding
- Brockway, Zebulon
- Discretionary Release
- Elmira System
- Firearms and Community Corrections Personnel
- Furloughs
- Good Time and Merit Time
- Graduated Sanctions for Juvenile Offenders
- Irish Marks System
- Maconochie, Alexander
- Pardon and Restoration of Rights
- Parole
- Parole Boards and Hearings
- Parole Commission, U.S.
- Parole Commission Phaseout Act of 1996
- Parole Guidelines Score
- Parole Officers
- Pre-Parole Plan
- Prisoner's Family and Reentry
- Probation and Parole: Intensive Supervision
- Reentry Courts
- Reentry Programs and Initiatives
- Salient Factor Score
- Truth-in-Sentencing Provisions
- Victim Impact Statements
- Work/Study Release Programs
- Addiction-Specific Support Groups
- Correctional Case Managers
- Counseling
- Crime Victims' Concerns
- Cultural Competence
- Disabled Offenders
- Diversity in Community Corrections
- Drug- and Alcohol-Abusing Offenders and Treatment
- Drug Testing in Community Corrections
- Effectiveness of Community Corrections
- Elderly Offenders
- Environmental Crime Prevention
- Evaluation of Programs
- Female Offenders and Special Needs
- Job Satisfaction in Community Corrections
- Juvenile Aftercare
- Juvenile and Youth Offenders
- Liability
- Martinson, Robert
- Motivational Interviewing
- Offenders with Mental Illness
- Public Shaming as Punishment
- Recidivism
- Sex Offender Registration
- Sex Offenders in the Community
- Sexual and Gender Minorities and Special Needs
- Sexual Predators: Civil Commitment
- Therapeutic Communities
- Therapeutic Jurisprudence
- Thinking for a Change
- Victim Services
- “What Works” Approach and Evidence-Based Practices
- Women in Community Service Program
- Loading...
Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL
-
Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
-
Read modern, diverse business cases
-
Explore hundreds of books and reference titles
Sage Recommends
We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.
Have you created a personal profile? Login or create a profile so that you can save clips, playlists and searches