Entry
Reader's guide
Entries A-Z
Subject index
Philosophy of Community Corrections
Conservative philosophers have enshrined punishment as the cornerstone of moral authority and thus the central purpose for intervention in response to crime. This philosophy of corrections generally places little credence in the capacity of most offenders to change behavior, except in response to a threat of incarceration. The liberal or progressive philosophy of corrections, by contrast, traditionally focuses on rehabilitative strategies that seek to treat the assumed underlying causes of crime. Accordingly, it is assumed that criminal justice intervention must be kept to a minimum. In a third approach, libertarians are skeptical of the motives of those seeking either to punish or to treat offenders; they are more concerned that intervention, no matter what the intent, often makes matters worse. Essential to any philosophical underpinning to community corrections, however, is the notion of treating the offender with dignity. The best effort at doing this today is through restorative justice.
Community corrections is a rubric for various activities and programs that are designed to encourage the offender's law-abiding behavior through the application of various forms of punishment and the use of treatment programs when necessary. The philosophy of community corrections is based on the notion that society is willing to take a chance on offenders who desire to stay crime-free and are willing to participate in programs intended to help them with their problems. Offenders are allowed to stay in the community as long as they comply with the conditions of probation, such as participating in drug treatment programs, maintaining employment, attending school, providing support and care for their families, and leading crime-free lives. Offenders are supervised by community corrections officers as long as they follow the prescribed plan put forward by the court. Failure to live according to these requirements can lead to imprisonment.
From the start, the purposes of community corrections were consistent with the belief that the offender benefited most from addressing concrete issues related to finding work or attending school. Community corrections personnel are drawn to this line of work because of their interest in people, their interpersonal skills, and their problem-solving abilities. The professional orientation of the community corrections officer, who is the bedrock of the profession, stems from several conditions. Community corrections personnel for the most part are required to have a college degree in the social sciences (particularly those related to social work, psychology, and other social sciences related to the field) and prior experience working with people and their problems.
Community corrections officers work in agencies with organizational structures that are far less militaristic and regimented than is generally found in law enforcement and other criminal justice fields. Community corrections personnel are encouraged to adapt to a professional culture that emphasizes a philosophy supportive of community corrections, a unique disciplinary language, a set of identified goals and objectives for the work, and a knowledge base necessary to do the job. Community corrections personnel further develop their professional orientation through the application of social science principles to their caseloads. These “clients” are met on a regular basis both in the office and in the field. During these meetings, the officer evaluates how the client is progressing in terms of education, work, family relationships, and any required treatment programs. Community corrections personnel also acquire a professional orientation by their association with the judiciary, with which they must work closely in developing the community corrections plan as the result of writing up a pre-sentence investigative report, on which the judge relies to get an accurate description the offender.
...
- Actuarial Risk Assessment
- Classification Systems
- COMPASS Program
- Firearms Charges, Offenders With
- Hare Psychopathy Checklist
- Level of Service Inventory
- Offender Needs
- Offender Responsivity
- Offender Risks
- Prediction Instruments
- Predispositional Reports for Juveniles
- Risk and Needs Assessment Instruments
- Risk Assessment Instruments: Three Generations
- Wisconsin Risk Assessment Instrument
- Absconding
- Augustus, John
- Benefit of Clergy
- Boston's Operation Night Light
- Case Management
- Caseload and Workload Standards
- Circle Sentencing
- Conditional Sentencing and Release
- Conditions of Community Corrections
- Continuum of Sanctions
- Crime Control Model of Corrections
- Curfews
- Diversion Programs
- Drug Courts
- Faith-Based Initiatives
- False Negatives and False Positives
- Family Courts
- Family Group Conferencing
- Family Therapy
- Felony Probation
- Field Visits
- Investigative Reports
- Juvenile Probation Officers
- Manhattan Bail Project
- Mediation
- Mental Health Courts
- Neighborhood Probation
- Offender Supervision
- Pre-Sentence Investigation Reports
- Pretrial Detention
- Pretrial Supervision
- Probation
- Probation: Administration Models
- Probation: Early Termination
- Probation: Organization of Services
- Probation: Private
- Probation and Judicial Reprieve
- Probation and Parole: Intensive Supervision
- Probation and Parole Fees
- Probation Mentor Home Program
- Probation Officers
- Probation Officers: Job Stress
- Project Safeway
- Recognizance
- Reparation Boards
- Restorative Justice
- Revocation
- Sanctuary
- Shock Probation
- SMART Partnership
- Specialized Caseload Models
- Teen Courts
- Victim-Offender Reconciliation Programs
- Wilderness Experience
- Attitudes and Myths about Punishment
- Attitudes of Offenders toward Community Corrections
- Bail Reform Act of 1984
- Banishment
- Beccaria, Cesare
- Bentham, Jeremy
- Certified Criminal Justice Professional
- Civil and Political Rights Affected by Conviction
- Community Corrections Acts
- Community Corrections and Sanctions
- Community Corrections as an Add-on to Imprisonment
- Community Corrections as an Alternative to Imprisonment
- Community Partnerships
- Cook County Juvenile Court
- Costs of Community Corrections
- Determinate Sentencing
- Employment-Related Rights of Offenders
- Ethics of Community-Based Sanctions
- Flat Time
- Front-End and Back-End Programming
- Goals and Objectives of Community Corrections
- History of Community Corrections
- Humanitarianism
- Indeterminate Sentencing
- Law Enforcement Administration Act Initiatives
- Long-Term Offender Designation
- Loss of Capacity to Be Bonded
- Loss of Individual Rights
- Loss of Parental Rights
- Loss of Right to Possess Firearms
- Loss of Welfare Benefits
- Net Widening
- Philosophy of Community Corrections
- Political Determinants of Corrections Policy
- President's Task Force on Corrections
- Prison Overcrowding
- Public Opinion of Community Corrections
- Public Safety and Collaborative Prevention
- Punishment
- Punishment Units
- Reducing Prison Populations
- Reintegration into Communities
- Second Chance Act
- Sentencing Guidelines
- Serious and Violent Offender Reentry Initiative
- Split Sentencing and Blended Sentencing
- Temperance Movement
- Three Strikes and You're Out
- Victims of Crime Act of 1984
- Violent Offender Reconciliation Programs
- Volunteers and Community Corrections
- Boot Camps
- Community Service Order
- Community-Based Centers
- Community-Based Vocational Networks
- Day Reporting Centers
- Electronic Monitoring
- Financial Penalties
- Fine Options Programs
- GPS Tracking
- Group Homes
- Halfway Houses and Residential Centers
- Home Confinement and House Arrest
- NIMBY Syndrome
- Probation and Parole: Intensive Supervision
- Residential Correctional Programs
- Residential Programs for Juveniles
- Restitution
- Restitution Centers
- Absconding
- Brockway, Zebulon
- Discretionary Release
- Elmira System
- Firearms and Community Corrections Personnel
- Furloughs
- Good Time and Merit Time
- Graduated Sanctions for Juvenile Offenders
- Irish Marks System
- Maconochie, Alexander
- Pardon and Restoration of Rights
- Parole
- Parole Boards and Hearings
- Parole Commission, U.S.
- Parole Commission Phaseout Act of 1996
- Parole Guidelines Score
- Parole Officers
- Pre-Parole Plan
- Prisoner's Family and Reentry
- Probation and Parole: Intensive Supervision
- Reentry Courts
- Reentry Programs and Initiatives
- Salient Factor Score
- Truth-in-Sentencing Provisions
- Victim Impact Statements
- Work/Study Release Programs
- Addiction-Specific Support Groups
- Correctional Case Managers
- Counseling
- Crime Victims' Concerns
- Cultural Competence
- Disabled Offenders
- Diversity in Community Corrections
- Drug- and Alcohol-Abusing Offenders and Treatment
- Drug Testing in Community Corrections
- Effectiveness of Community Corrections
- Elderly Offenders
- Environmental Crime Prevention
- Evaluation of Programs
- Female Offenders and Special Needs
- Job Satisfaction in Community Corrections
- Juvenile Aftercare
- Juvenile and Youth Offenders
- Liability
- Martinson, Robert
- Motivational Interviewing
- Offenders with Mental Illness
- Public Shaming as Punishment
- Recidivism
- Sex Offender Registration
- Sex Offenders in the Community
- Sexual and Gender Minorities and Special Needs
- Sexual Predators: Civil Commitment
- Therapeutic Communities
- Therapeutic Jurisprudence
- Thinking for a Change
- Victim Services
- “What Works” Approach and Evidence-Based Practices
- Women in Community Service Program
- Loading...
Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL
-
Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
-
Read modern, diverse business cases
-
Explore hundreds of books and reference titles
Sage Recommends
We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.
Have you created a personal profile? Login or create a profile so that you can save clips, playlists and searches