Entry
Reader's guide
Entries A-Z
Subject index
Neighborhood Probation
Many jurisdictions have begun to embrace a particularly new and innovative alternative sentencing program of supervising offenders in collaboration with other key agencies, resources, and organizations within the immediate community where the probationer resides. Commonly known as neighborhood probation (although also referred to as community probation, community supervision, community justice, or neighborhood-based supervision), this method places strong emphasis on public safety, accessibility, and accountability by establishing relationships with local police departments, charitable organizations, faith-based groups, probationer-friendly employers, human services and treatment providers, and other community groups.
These partnerships serve to develop a visible presence for probation agencies whereby officers can take an active role in community development and service delivery and collaborate with key players in the supervision of community service orders and in developing solutions to local problems. The aim is to improve the efficacy of probation services, enhance the quality of life for both probationers and communities, and contribute to crime reduction. Depending on location and resources, probation agencies will typically assign officers and staff to a neighborhood probation office located in the community they serve, in order to ensure visibility, accessibility, and centralization of services for both probationers and communities. Generally, offenders under neighborhood probation are those who are considered problematic to communities—such as gang members, substance abusers, and other chronic and nuisance offenders—who therefore require a combination of services, treatment, and monitoring in order to be managed effectively while completing their probation orders.
One of the first examples of neighborhood supervision may have originated from Madison, Wisconsin, where, between 1989 and 1991, there was a threefold increase in police calls for service in Broadway-Simpson, an area of more than 900 apartments with 500 children and a large number of offenders who were known to reside there, thus leading to a high number of probation violations. The problem continued despite greater policing efforts, until an experienced African American probation officer, Cheryl Knox, volunteered to take responsibility for establishing an office in the neighborhood center, where she began working both with police, to identify offenders, and with other agencies, to coordinate services in conjunction with probation supervisions. For example, she accompanied various staff members (such as healthcare, human services, and housing workers) on home visits to probationers. Over time, this helped to develop strong working relationships with key agencies and other contacts in the community, creating opportunities to educate the community about neighborhood probation strategies and providing a more positive experience for probationers.
In 1991, Project Safeway was established in Chicago, Illinois, in a neighborhood facility within an area that had a high offender population in close proximity to the center and a number of community resources. The main goals were to strengthen relationships with probationers and the community, provide full probative services, and initiate long-term and lasting change to the lives of probationers through a variety of individual, family, and neighborhood interventions. To do this, the project formed an advisory board consisting of community representatives who could help identify the needs of the community and offenders; address project concerns, implementation, and delivery; find volunteers; coordinate services; and plan activities for networking. Once implemented, Project Safeway provided a number of offender programs, including probation orientation, classes leading to the general equivalency diploma (GED), substance abuse evaluations, community service opportunities, job training and placement, parenting skills, and health education—all of which made use of local community resources.
...
- Actuarial Risk Assessment
- Classification Systems
- COMPASS Program
- Firearms Charges, Offenders With
- Hare Psychopathy Checklist
- Level of Service Inventory
- Offender Needs
- Offender Responsivity
- Offender Risks
- Prediction Instruments
- Predispositional Reports for Juveniles
- Risk and Needs Assessment Instruments
- Risk Assessment Instruments: Three Generations
- Wisconsin Risk Assessment Instrument
- Absconding
- Augustus, John
- Benefit of Clergy
- Boston's Operation Night Light
- Case Management
- Caseload and Workload Standards
- Circle Sentencing
- Conditional Sentencing and Release
- Conditions of Community Corrections
- Continuum of Sanctions
- Crime Control Model of Corrections
- Curfews
- Diversion Programs
- Drug Courts
- Faith-Based Initiatives
- False Negatives and False Positives
- Family Courts
- Family Group Conferencing
- Family Therapy
- Felony Probation
- Field Visits
- Investigative Reports
- Juvenile Probation Officers
- Manhattan Bail Project
- Mediation
- Mental Health Courts
- Neighborhood Probation
- Offender Supervision
- Pre-Sentence Investigation Reports
- Pretrial Detention
- Pretrial Supervision
- Probation
- Probation: Administration Models
- Probation: Early Termination
- Probation: Organization of Services
- Probation: Private
- Probation and Judicial Reprieve
- Probation and Parole: Intensive Supervision
- Probation and Parole Fees
- Probation Mentor Home Program
- Probation Officers
- Probation Officers: Job Stress
- Project Safeway
- Recognizance
- Reparation Boards
- Restorative Justice
- Revocation
- Sanctuary
- Shock Probation
- SMART Partnership
- Specialized Caseload Models
- Teen Courts
- Victim-Offender Reconciliation Programs
- Wilderness Experience
- Attitudes and Myths about Punishment
- Attitudes of Offenders toward Community Corrections
- Bail Reform Act of 1984
- Banishment
- Beccaria, Cesare
- Bentham, Jeremy
- Certified Criminal Justice Professional
- Civil and Political Rights Affected by Conviction
- Community Corrections Acts
- Community Corrections and Sanctions
- Community Corrections as an Add-on to Imprisonment
- Community Corrections as an Alternative to Imprisonment
- Community Partnerships
- Cook County Juvenile Court
- Costs of Community Corrections
- Determinate Sentencing
- Employment-Related Rights of Offenders
- Ethics of Community-Based Sanctions
- Flat Time
- Front-End and Back-End Programming
- Goals and Objectives of Community Corrections
- History of Community Corrections
- Humanitarianism
- Indeterminate Sentencing
- Law Enforcement Administration Act Initiatives
- Long-Term Offender Designation
- Loss of Capacity to Be Bonded
- Loss of Individual Rights
- Loss of Parental Rights
- Loss of Right to Possess Firearms
- Loss of Welfare Benefits
- Net Widening
- Philosophy of Community Corrections
- Political Determinants of Corrections Policy
- President's Task Force on Corrections
- Prison Overcrowding
- Public Opinion of Community Corrections
- Public Safety and Collaborative Prevention
- Punishment
- Punishment Units
- Reducing Prison Populations
- Reintegration into Communities
- Second Chance Act
- Sentencing Guidelines
- Serious and Violent Offender Reentry Initiative
- Split Sentencing and Blended Sentencing
- Temperance Movement
- Three Strikes and You're Out
- Victims of Crime Act of 1984
- Violent Offender Reconciliation Programs
- Volunteers and Community Corrections
- Boot Camps
- Community Service Order
- Community-Based Centers
- Community-Based Vocational Networks
- Day Reporting Centers
- Electronic Monitoring
- Financial Penalties
- Fine Options Programs
- GPS Tracking
- Group Homes
- Halfway Houses and Residential Centers
- Home Confinement and House Arrest
- NIMBY Syndrome
- Probation and Parole: Intensive Supervision
- Residential Correctional Programs
- Residential Programs for Juveniles
- Restitution
- Restitution Centers
- Absconding
- Brockway, Zebulon
- Discretionary Release
- Elmira System
- Firearms and Community Corrections Personnel
- Furloughs
- Good Time and Merit Time
- Graduated Sanctions for Juvenile Offenders
- Irish Marks System
- Maconochie, Alexander
- Pardon and Restoration of Rights
- Parole
- Parole Boards and Hearings
- Parole Commission, U.S.
- Parole Commission Phaseout Act of 1996
- Parole Guidelines Score
- Parole Officers
- Pre-Parole Plan
- Prisoner's Family and Reentry
- Probation and Parole: Intensive Supervision
- Reentry Courts
- Reentry Programs and Initiatives
- Salient Factor Score
- Truth-in-Sentencing Provisions
- Victim Impact Statements
- Work/Study Release Programs
- Addiction-Specific Support Groups
- Correctional Case Managers
- Counseling
- Crime Victims' Concerns
- Cultural Competence
- Disabled Offenders
- Diversity in Community Corrections
- Drug- and Alcohol-Abusing Offenders and Treatment
- Drug Testing in Community Corrections
- Effectiveness of Community Corrections
- Elderly Offenders
- Environmental Crime Prevention
- Evaluation of Programs
- Female Offenders and Special Needs
- Job Satisfaction in Community Corrections
- Juvenile Aftercare
- Juvenile and Youth Offenders
- Liability
- Martinson, Robert
- Motivational Interviewing
- Offenders with Mental Illness
- Public Shaming as Punishment
- Recidivism
- Sex Offender Registration
- Sex Offenders in the Community
- Sexual and Gender Minorities and Special Needs
- Sexual Predators: Civil Commitment
- Therapeutic Communities
- Therapeutic Jurisprudence
- Thinking for a Change
- Victim Services
- “What Works” Approach and Evidence-Based Practices
- Women in Community Service Program
- Loading...
Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL
-
Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
-
Read modern, diverse business cases
-
Explore hundreds of books and reference titles
Sage Recommends
We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.
Have you created a personal profile? Login or create a profile so that you can save clips, playlists and searches