Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Since the 1960s, the location of offenders under community supervision has been monitored with the assistance of electronic devices. Increasingly, electronic monitoring relies on technology that uses the global positioning system (GPS) to monitor offenders. The adoption of GPS monitoring has been facilitated by court decisions that find this form of surveillance can be employed without violating the offender's constitutional rights. In fact, some states now require the use of GPS for certain perceived high-risk offender groups, particularly sex offenders. GPS monitoring has also become more common in the supervision of domestic violence and drug offenders, as well as supervisees with gang affiliations. Although it has become an accepted part of community supervision, GPS monitoring is not without its complications.

GPS technology was created by the U.S. Department of Defense in the 1970s. Over time, GPS has been adapted for nonmilitary purposes and has become more affordable and portable. Usually combined with radio-frequency receivers, computer technology, and cell phone service, GPS utilizes satellites orbiting the earth to communicate information in real time (or near real time) about geographic location. In community corrections, offenders are generally required to wear a tamper-resistant, battery-operated radio-frequency transmitter around the ankle. They also must carry a portable GPS tracking unit with them, usually strapped around the waist or shoulder or carried by hand. If the offender fails to carry or attempts to disable the GPS tracking unit, enters a prohibited area, or leaves his or her home without authorization, an alert is issued to a central monitoring unit, overseen by corrections professionals or a private contractor. The offender's supervisor is then notified. Even if the offender has not acted in violation of his or her supervision conditions, the supervisor can track the offender's movements from stored data, which might be useful in identifying, or eliminating, the offender in reports of new crimes. Some newer GPS units can also determine alcohol consumption, which makes them useful in monitoring those who have been convicted of driving under the influence (DUI) or other offenses in which alcohol has played a significant role.

Offenders in community corrections programs are often required to carry a portable GPS tracking unit to monitor that they do not enter a prohibited area or leave their home without permission. Community corrections supervisors estimate that 70 percent of GPS alerts are false alarms.

None

Passive, active, and hybrid GPS monitoring systems are currently in use. Unlike active systems, which constantly relay real-time location information via cell phone service to a central monitoring system, passive systems relay information only when the offender connects the GPS tracking unit to a docking station, usually connected with a land-line telephone. Hybrid systems are also available; these report information every few hours, and if an alert is detected, the real-time active system is triggered.

GPS programs attempt to balance the integration of offenders into the community with public safety and security. GPS monitoring is significantly cheaper than incarceration. A cost analysis conducted in Florida estimated that enrolling all sex offenders in a GPS monitoring program would cost $8 million, but incarcerating them would cost $56 million. Also, to the degree that GPS monitoring diverts offenders from incarceration, it can lessen problems associated with overcrowding in jails and prisons.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading