Entry
Reader's guide
Entries A-Z
Subject index
Firearms and Community Corrections Personnel
Perceived and real threats of violence exist for those responsible for ensuring public safety in the community. To remedy these dangers, states have begun incorporating the use of both lethal and nonlethal measures for addressing safety concerns while on the job.
The Need for Protection
As of 2009, more than 5 million individuals were under some form of community-based sanction. The level and quality of offender supervision are paramount for those responsible for reducing recidivism and ensuring community safety. More specifically, public opinion polls conducted in Massachusetts during the latter half of the 1990s reveal that only 26 percent of respondents reported being confident that their probation system could adequately supervise offenders, and more than 50 percent reported that a probation sentence was too lenient.
At one point in history, the role of community correctional officers (CCOs) was to assist offenders in societal reintegration. CCOs had a more therapeutic role, similar to that of a social worker. After World War II, politicians found themselves more involved in the area of community corrections, creating legislation that would, over time, transform the therapeutic role of CCOs into that of a law-enforcement figure. Over the past 20 to 25 years, changes in philosophy have resulted in an increase in the workload allocation for the CCO. For example, increased responsibilities include making more frequent contacts both in the field and in the office, completing more detailed paperwork, meeting more stringent deadlines in shorter periods of time, and maintaining larger caseload sizes (the average caseload size for probation officers is 139). Officers have simultaneously been asked to perform the tasks of retribution (punishment), while ensuring the rehabilitation (treatment) of offenders.
In addition to increases in workload demands, courts have continued to place higher-risk offenders on community-based alternative sanctions. In 2009, for example, 51 percent of all persons on probation were convicted of felony offenses. These figures are particularly worrisome when research reveals that as many as 39 to 55 percent of all community-based officers report either being victims of or receiving threats of violence while on the job. Furthermore, between the years 2000 and 2009, more than one fifth of all homicides of law enforcement officers in the line of duty were committed by individuals who were on probation or parole at the time. The majority of homicides are committed between the hours of 9:00 p.m. and 10:00 p.m., which are typically the times CCOs complete their field visits. Despite this high number of reported violent victimizations, to date no one mechanism for tracking the number of CCO assaults exists.
CCOs' Use of Weapons
As these statistics suggest, the threat to CCOs continues to increase, and therefore so does the need for officers to protect themselves and the public. As a result, more CCOs are carrying weapons, both lethal and nonlethal, and increasing their use of safety training. The increased use of firearms by CCOs accompanies their growing authority in the lives of offenders.
For example, numerous probation officers in New York City are now authorized to carry firearms as a response to their work with high-risk dangerous offenders. Similarly, many probation departments in the state of California permit the utilization of firearms by their officers. West Virginia allows probation officers to carry firearms without a permit, while New Jersey's Probation Officer Community Safety Unit Act requires that no fewer than five officers in each county carry a firearm and enforce warrants. Other states, such as Florida, have begun to use dart-firing stun guns as nonlethal alternatives to firearms.
...
- Actuarial Risk Assessment
- Classification Systems
- COMPASS Program
- Firearms Charges, Offenders With
- Hare Psychopathy Checklist
- Level of Service Inventory
- Offender Needs
- Offender Responsivity
- Offender Risks
- Prediction Instruments
- Predispositional Reports for Juveniles
- Risk and Needs Assessment Instruments
- Risk Assessment Instruments: Three Generations
- Wisconsin Risk Assessment Instrument
- Absconding
- Augustus, John
- Benefit of Clergy
- Boston's Operation Night Light
- Case Management
- Caseload and Workload Standards
- Circle Sentencing
- Conditional Sentencing and Release
- Conditions of Community Corrections
- Continuum of Sanctions
- Crime Control Model of Corrections
- Curfews
- Diversion Programs
- Drug Courts
- Faith-Based Initiatives
- False Negatives and False Positives
- Family Courts
- Family Group Conferencing
- Family Therapy
- Felony Probation
- Field Visits
- Investigative Reports
- Juvenile Probation Officers
- Manhattan Bail Project
- Mediation
- Mental Health Courts
- Neighborhood Probation
- Offender Supervision
- Pre-Sentence Investigation Reports
- Pretrial Detention
- Pretrial Supervision
- Probation
- Probation: Administration Models
- Probation: Early Termination
- Probation: Organization of Services
- Probation: Private
- Probation and Judicial Reprieve
- Probation and Parole: Intensive Supervision
- Probation and Parole Fees
- Probation Mentor Home Program
- Probation Officers
- Probation Officers: Job Stress
- Project Safeway
- Recognizance
- Reparation Boards
- Restorative Justice
- Revocation
- Sanctuary
- Shock Probation
- SMART Partnership
- Specialized Caseload Models
- Teen Courts
- Victim-Offender Reconciliation Programs
- Wilderness Experience
- Attitudes and Myths about Punishment
- Attitudes of Offenders toward Community Corrections
- Bail Reform Act of 1984
- Banishment
- Beccaria, Cesare
- Bentham, Jeremy
- Certified Criminal Justice Professional
- Civil and Political Rights Affected by Conviction
- Community Corrections Acts
- Community Corrections and Sanctions
- Community Corrections as an Add-on to Imprisonment
- Community Corrections as an Alternative to Imprisonment
- Community Partnerships
- Cook County Juvenile Court
- Costs of Community Corrections
- Determinate Sentencing
- Employment-Related Rights of Offenders
- Ethics of Community-Based Sanctions
- Flat Time
- Front-End and Back-End Programming
- Goals and Objectives of Community Corrections
- History of Community Corrections
- Humanitarianism
- Indeterminate Sentencing
- Law Enforcement Administration Act Initiatives
- Long-Term Offender Designation
- Loss of Capacity to Be Bonded
- Loss of Individual Rights
- Loss of Parental Rights
- Loss of Right to Possess Firearms
- Loss of Welfare Benefits
- Net Widening
- Philosophy of Community Corrections
- Political Determinants of Corrections Policy
- President's Task Force on Corrections
- Prison Overcrowding
- Public Opinion of Community Corrections
- Public Safety and Collaborative Prevention
- Punishment
- Punishment Units
- Reducing Prison Populations
- Reintegration into Communities
- Second Chance Act
- Sentencing Guidelines
- Serious and Violent Offender Reentry Initiative
- Split Sentencing and Blended Sentencing
- Temperance Movement
- Three Strikes and You're Out
- Victims of Crime Act of 1984
- Violent Offender Reconciliation Programs
- Volunteers and Community Corrections
- Boot Camps
- Community Service Order
- Community-Based Centers
- Community-Based Vocational Networks
- Day Reporting Centers
- Electronic Monitoring
- Financial Penalties
- Fine Options Programs
- GPS Tracking
- Group Homes
- Halfway Houses and Residential Centers
- Home Confinement and House Arrest
- NIMBY Syndrome
- Probation and Parole: Intensive Supervision
- Residential Correctional Programs
- Residential Programs for Juveniles
- Restitution
- Restitution Centers
- Absconding
- Brockway, Zebulon
- Discretionary Release
- Elmira System
- Firearms and Community Corrections Personnel
- Furloughs
- Good Time and Merit Time
- Graduated Sanctions for Juvenile Offenders
- Irish Marks System
- Maconochie, Alexander
- Pardon and Restoration of Rights
- Parole
- Parole Boards and Hearings
- Parole Commission, U.S.
- Parole Commission Phaseout Act of 1996
- Parole Guidelines Score
- Parole Officers
- Pre-Parole Plan
- Prisoner's Family and Reentry
- Probation and Parole: Intensive Supervision
- Reentry Courts
- Reentry Programs and Initiatives
- Salient Factor Score
- Truth-in-Sentencing Provisions
- Victim Impact Statements
- Work/Study Release Programs
- Addiction-Specific Support Groups
- Correctional Case Managers
- Counseling
- Crime Victims' Concerns
- Cultural Competence
- Disabled Offenders
- Diversity in Community Corrections
- Drug- and Alcohol-Abusing Offenders and Treatment
- Drug Testing in Community Corrections
- Effectiveness of Community Corrections
- Elderly Offenders
- Environmental Crime Prevention
- Evaluation of Programs
- Female Offenders and Special Needs
- Job Satisfaction in Community Corrections
- Juvenile Aftercare
- Juvenile and Youth Offenders
- Liability
- Martinson, Robert
- Motivational Interviewing
- Offenders with Mental Illness
- Public Shaming as Punishment
- Recidivism
- Sex Offender Registration
- Sex Offenders in the Community
- Sexual and Gender Minorities and Special Needs
- Sexual Predators: Civil Commitment
- Therapeutic Communities
- Therapeutic Jurisprudence
- Thinking for a Change
- Victim Services
- “What Works” Approach and Evidence-Based Practices
- Women in Community Service Program
- Loading...
Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL
-
Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
-
Read modern, diverse business cases
-
Explore hundreds of books and reference titles
Sage Recommends
We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.
Have you created a personal profile? Login or create a profile so that you can save clips, playlists and searches