Entry
Reader's guide
Entries A-Z
Subject index
Firearms Charges, Offenders With
Like the overall crime rate, firearm-related offenses have declined in most jurisdictions since the mid-1990s. However, the number of violent or weapons-law offenders entering community corrections supervision has increased since the end of the 1990s. The justice system has responded to public concerns about firearm offenses by enacting new and tougher firearm legislation and increasing the level of federal involvement in these crimes. As a consequence of these changes, an increasing proportion of offenders who used a gun in the commission of a crime have been sent to prison and return to the community under parole supervision. Corrections officials have reacted to these changes by establishing community supervision programs and policies that focus on protecting the public.
Concern for Firearm Offenses among Those under Community Supervision
Professionals have targeted the prevention of firearm-related offenses among probationers and parolees convicted of violent and weapons-related offenses, since these individuals are becoming more numerous and are at high risk for violent offending and victimization. Even parolees and probationers who have not been convicted of firearm-related offenses have been the target of specialized community corrections firearm-reduction programs and policies, since they share social conditions with and are demographically similar to firearm offenders. Both groups disproportionately reside and spend time in high-crime urban areas, and in both groups there is an overrepresentation of males. The overrepresentation of minorities under community supervision is also striking. Minority overrepresentation is also evident with firearm-related offenders: Blacks are five times more likely than whites to be arrested on a weapons charge, and the gun homicide rate for young Hispanic males is about seven times the rate for young white males. Probationers and parolees are also at great risk for becoming victims of violent crime. Three quarters (75 percent) of young homicide victims in Boston had a prior criminal record, and in Philadelphia 93 percent of homicide victims had a prior criminal record. Nationally, males with a criminal record are 22 times more likely to incur a firearm-related injury than are males with no criminal record.
Preventing Firearm Offenses by Those under Community Supervision
Community corrections agencies have become increasingly diverse in their strategies for supervising specific offender groups, and they have implemented several innovative programs to supervise firearm offenders and prevent subsequent crimes. One of the most replicated programs is lever pulling. Lever pulling is a process that utilizes the justice system's resources in a collective way to provide probationers and parolees with a “carrot” and “stick” message. At lever-pulling meetings, probationers and parolees are provided a choice: Officials suggest resources to help them lead law-abiding lives, but they are also informed that if they choose to continue their violent lifestyles, justice agencies will collaborate to ensure that they receive the maximum penalties under the law.
Community corrections officers have also been actively involved in preventing firearm-related offenses. One widely replicated prevention effort is Operation Night Light, which began as a partnership between Boston-area probation and police officers. It pairs one probation officer with two police officers to make surprise visits to high-risk youth probationers during the nontraditional work hours of 7:00 p.m. to midnight. In Boston, probationer new arrests declined 9.2 percent between January 1994 and June 1996, compared with a statewide increase of 14 percent.
...
- Actuarial Risk Assessment
- Classification Systems
- COMPASS Program
- Firearms Charges, Offenders With
- Hare Psychopathy Checklist
- Level of Service Inventory
- Offender Needs
- Offender Responsivity
- Offender Risks
- Prediction Instruments
- Predispositional Reports for Juveniles
- Risk and Needs Assessment Instruments
- Risk Assessment Instruments: Three Generations
- Wisconsin Risk Assessment Instrument
- Absconding
- Augustus, John
- Benefit of Clergy
- Boston's Operation Night Light
- Case Management
- Caseload and Workload Standards
- Circle Sentencing
- Conditional Sentencing and Release
- Conditions of Community Corrections
- Continuum of Sanctions
- Crime Control Model of Corrections
- Curfews
- Diversion Programs
- Drug Courts
- Faith-Based Initiatives
- False Negatives and False Positives
- Family Courts
- Family Group Conferencing
- Family Therapy
- Felony Probation
- Field Visits
- Investigative Reports
- Juvenile Probation Officers
- Manhattan Bail Project
- Mediation
- Mental Health Courts
- Neighborhood Probation
- Offender Supervision
- Pre-Sentence Investigation Reports
- Pretrial Detention
- Pretrial Supervision
- Probation
- Probation: Administration Models
- Probation: Early Termination
- Probation: Organization of Services
- Probation: Private
- Probation and Judicial Reprieve
- Probation and Parole: Intensive Supervision
- Probation and Parole Fees
- Probation Mentor Home Program
- Probation Officers
- Probation Officers: Job Stress
- Project Safeway
- Recognizance
- Reparation Boards
- Restorative Justice
- Revocation
- Sanctuary
- Shock Probation
- SMART Partnership
- Specialized Caseload Models
- Teen Courts
- Victim-Offender Reconciliation Programs
- Wilderness Experience
- Attitudes and Myths about Punishment
- Attitudes of Offenders toward Community Corrections
- Bail Reform Act of 1984
- Banishment
- Beccaria, Cesare
- Bentham, Jeremy
- Certified Criminal Justice Professional
- Civil and Political Rights Affected by Conviction
- Community Corrections Acts
- Community Corrections and Sanctions
- Community Corrections as an Add-on to Imprisonment
- Community Corrections as an Alternative to Imprisonment
- Community Partnerships
- Cook County Juvenile Court
- Costs of Community Corrections
- Determinate Sentencing
- Employment-Related Rights of Offenders
- Ethics of Community-Based Sanctions
- Flat Time
- Front-End and Back-End Programming
- Goals and Objectives of Community Corrections
- History of Community Corrections
- Humanitarianism
- Indeterminate Sentencing
- Law Enforcement Administration Act Initiatives
- Long-Term Offender Designation
- Loss of Capacity to Be Bonded
- Loss of Individual Rights
- Loss of Parental Rights
- Loss of Right to Possess Firearms
- Loss of Welfare Benefits
- Net Widening
- Philosophy of Community Corrections
- Political Determinants of Corrections Policy
- President's Task Force on Corrections
- Prison Overcrowding
- Public Opinion of Community Corrections
- Public Safety and Collaborative Prevention
- Punishment
- Punishment Units
- Reducing Prison Populations
- Reintegration into Communities
- Second Chance Act
- Sentencing Guidelines
- Serious and Violent Offender Reentry Initiative
- Split Sentencing and Blended Sentencing
- Temperance Movement
- Three Strikes and You're Out
- Victims of Crime Act of 1984
- Violent Offender Reconciliation Programs
- Volunteers and Community Corrections
- Boot Camps
- Community Service Order
- Community-Based Centers
- Community-Based Vocational Networks
- Day Reporting Centers
- Electronic Monitoring
- Financial Penalties
- Fine Options Programs
- GPS Tracking
- Group Homes
- Halfway Houses and Residential Centers
- Home Confinement and House Arrest
- NIMBY Syndrome
- Probation and Parole: Intensive Supervision
- Residential Correctional Programs
- Residential Programs for Juveniles
- Restitution
- Restitution Centers
- Absconding
- Brockway, Zebulon
- Discretionary Release
- Elmira System
- Firearms and Community Corrections Personnel
- Furloughs
- Good Time and Merit Time
- Graduated Sanctions for Juvenile Offenders
- Irish Marks System
- Maconochie, Alexander
- Pardon and Restoration of Rights
- Parole
- Parole Boards and Hearings
- Parole Commission, U.S.
- Parole Commission Phaseout Act of 1996
- Parole Guidelines Score
- Parole Officers
- Pre-Parole Plan
- Prisoner's Family and Reentry
- Probation and Parole: Intensive Supervision
- Reentry Courts
- Reentry Programs and Initiatives
- Salient Factor Score
- Truth-in-Sentencing Provisions
- Victim Impact Statements
- Work/Study Release Programs
- Addiction-Specific Support Groups
- Correctional Case Managers
- Counseling
- Crime Victims' Concerns
- Cultural Competence
- Disabled Offenders
- Diversity in Community Corrections
- Drug- and Alcohol-Abusing Offenders and Treatment
- Drug Testing in Community Corrections
- Effectiveness of Community Corrections
- Elderly Offenders
- Environmental Crime Prevention
- Evaluation of Programs
- Female Offenders and Special Needs
- Job Satisfaction in Community Corrections
- Juvenile Aftercare
- Juvenile and Youth Offenders
- Liability
- Martinson, Robert
- Motivational Interviewing
- Offenders with Mental Illness
- Public Shaming as Punishment
- Recidivism
- Sex Offender Registration
- Sex Offenders in the Community
- Sexual and Gender Minorities and Special Needs
- Sexual Predators: Civil Commitment
- Therapeutic Communities
- Therapeutic Jurisprudence
- Thinking for a Change
- Victim Services
- “What Works” Approach and Evidence-Based Practices
- Women in Community Service Program
- Loading...
Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL
-
Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
-
Read modern, diverse business cases
-
Explore hundreds of books and reference titles
Sage Recommends
We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.
Have you created a personal profile? Login or create a profile so that you can save clips, playlists and searches