Entry
Reader's guide
Entries A-Z
Subject index
Disabled Offenders
Disabled offenders are subject to the manipulation of those who would take advantage of their disabilities. Many intellectually disabled offenders have diminished insight as to how their exploitation unfolded and few options to protect themselves from additional mistreatment. Therefore, disabled offenders necessitate advocacy, intervention, education, and specialized case management.
Defining Disabled Offenders
The definition of disabled offender includes broad categories of the disability community. Disability offenders include individuals who have disabilities related to one or more of the following areas: (1) physical, (2) mental, (3) aging, or (4) additional disabilities. Basic categories include (1) severe psychological disability, (2) mental retardation, (3) neurological impairment, and (4) substance abuse problems. These individuals may suffer multiple handicaps, mental disorders, and drug abuse problems.
Offenders with severe social limitations, learning disabilities, language barriers, and educational deficiencies present a major dilemma. The aging inmate population and mandated sentences impact correctional communities with an assortment of infirmities, including Alzheimer's disease and other forms of dementia. Sex offenders, considered treatable, may also be included in the disabled category. This entry will emphasize intellectually disabled offenders.
Disabled offenders may suffer several handicaps, like neurological disorders, mental retardation, or drug abuse problems, and their specialized needs and problems require individualized attention and solutions.

Intellectually disabled offenders have difficulty when attempting to verbalize their needs and express themselves. Therefore, disabled individuals are particularly vulnerable to abuses from the criminal justice system; however, most of their crimes are less violent. Many disabled offenders have a profound need for acceptance. They have the capacity to be easily motivated or manipulated into engaging in criminal behaviors. Their goal is to achieve approval or friendship. This offender is especially vulnerable when dependent personality disorder is added to the intellectual disability.
Encounters with Law Enforcement and the Criminal Justice System
The intellectually disadvantaged population is particularly susceptible during police interviews and interrogations. Disabled offenders may be inclined to accommodate the police at some point in the interrogation. Because of their disability, they are more likely to confess to crimes they did not commit. In addition, they are less likely to understand their constitutional rights under the Miranda decision and thus are less likely to withhold statements pending an attorney's counsel.
The intellectually disadvantaged may desire to please those in authority, leading to inadequate legal counsel and speedy plea bargains. They are more likely to plead guilty and not necessarily receive a lesser sentence or reduced charges. The legal disadvantages at predetermined stages of the criminal justice system create a double standard for achieving justice for the disabled offender.
Inmates with intellectual disabilities are at constitutional risk and legal disadvantage during their experience with the criminal justice system. Pretrial and trial processes present conflict for disadvantaged offender populations. Their status creates the need for an individualized effort to meet the constitutional mandates of the Fourteenth Amendment (the due process clause and equal protection clause requirements). Immediate assistance from an attorney may help disabled individuals receive equal justice under the law.
The intellectually disabled are especially defenseless and open to exploitation when incarcerated with hardened criminals. There is approximately one intellectually disadvantaged prisoner for every 20 prisoners. Once incarcerated, the disabled prisoner is very likely to become victim to sexual exploitation, which leads to additional emotional problems.
...
- Actuarial Risk Assessment
- Classification Systems
- COMPASS Program
- Firearms Charges, Offenders With
- Hare Psychopathy Checklist
- Level of Service Inventory
- Offender Needs
- Offender Responsivity
- Offender Risks
- Prediction Instruments
- Predispositional Reports for Juveniles
- Risk and Needs Assessment Instruments
- Risk Assessment Instruments: Three Generations
- Wisconsin Risk Assessment Instrument
- Absconding
- Augustus, John
- Benefit of Clergy
- Boston's Operation Night Light
- Case Management
- Caseload and Workload Standards
- Circle Sentencing
- Conditional Sentencing and Release
- Conditions of Community Corrections
- Continuum of Sanctions
- Crime Control Model of Corrections
- Curfews
- Diversion Programs
- Drug Courts
- Faith-Based Initiatives
- False Negatives and False Positives
- Family Courts
- Family Group Conferencing
- Family Therapy
- Felony Probation
- Field Visits
- Investigative Reports
- Juvenile Probation Officers
- Manhattan Bail Project
- Mediation
- Mental Health Courts
- Neighborhood Probation
- Offender Supervision
- Pre-Sentence Investigation Reports
- Pretrial Detention
- Pretrial Supervision
- Probation
- Probation: Administration Models
- Probation: Early Termination
- Probation: Organization of Services
- Probation: Private
- Probation and Judicial Reprieve
- Probation and Parole: Intensive Supervision
- Probation and Parole Fees
- Probation Mentor Home Program
- Probation Officers
- Probation Officers: Job Stress
- Project Safeway
- Recognizance
- Reparation Boards
- Restorative Justice
- Revocation
- Sanctuary
- Shock Probation
- SMART Partnership
- Specialized Caseload Models
- Teen Courts
- Victim-Offender Reconciliation Programs
- Wilderness Experience
- Attitudes and Myths about Punishment
- Attitudes of Offenders toward Community Corrections
- Bail Reform Act of 1984
- Banishment
- Beccaria, Cesare
- Bentham, Jeremy
- Certified Criminal Justice Professional
- Civil and Political Rights Affected by Conviction
- Community Corrections Acts
- Community Corrections and Sanctions
- Community Corrections as an Add-on to Imprisonment
- Community Corrections as an Alternative to Imprisonment
- Community Partnerships
- Cook County Juvenile Court
- Costs of Community Corrections
- Determinate Sentencing
- Employment-Related Rights of Offenders
- Ethics of Community-Based Sanctions
- Flat Time
- Front-End and Back-End Programming
- Goals and Objectives of Community Corrections
- History of Community Corrections
- Humanitarianism
- Indeterminate Sentencing
- Law Enforcement Administration Act Initiatives
- Long-Term Offender Designation
- Loss of Capacity to Be Bonded
- Loss of Individual Rights
- Loss of Parental Rights
- Loss of Right to Possess Firearms
- Loss of Welfare Benefits
- Net Widening
- Philosophy of Community Corrections
- Political Determinants of Corrections Policy
- President's Task Force on Corrections
- Prison Overcrowding
- Public Opinion of Community Corrections
- Public Safety and Collaborative Prevention
- Punishment
- Punishment Units
- Reducing Prison Populations
- Reintegration into Communities
- Second Chance Act
- Sentencing Guidelines
- Serious and Violent Offender Reentry Initiative
- Split Sentencing and Blended Sentencing
- Temperance Movement
- Three Strikes and You're Out
- Victims of Crime Act of 1984
- Violent Offender Reconciliation Programs
- Volunteers and Community Corrections
- Boot Camps
- Community Service Order
- Community-Based Centers
- Community-Based Vocational Networks
- Day Reporting Centers
- Electronic Monitoring
- Financial Penalties
- Fine Options Programs
- GPS Tracking
- Group Homes
- Halfway Houses and Residential Centers
- Home Confinement and House Arrest
- NIMBY Syndrome
- Probation and Parole: Intensive Supervision
- Residential Correctional Programs
- Residential Programs for Juveniles
- Restitution
- Restitution Centers
- Absconding
- Brockway, Zebulon
- Discretionary Release
- Elmira System
- Firearms and Community Corrections Personnel
- Furloughs
- Good Time and Merit Time
- Graduated Sanctions for Juvenile Offenders
- Irish Marks System
- Maconochie, Alexander
- Pardon and Restoration of Rights
- Parole
- Parole Boards and Hearings
- Parole Commission, U.S.
- Parole Commission Phaseout Act of 1996
- Parole Guidelines Score
- Parole Officers
- Pre-Parole Plan
- Prisoner's Family and Reentry
- Probation and Parole: Intensive Supervision
- Reentry Courts
- Reentry Programs and Initiatives
- Salient Factor Score
- Truth-in-Sentencing Provisions
- Victim Impact Statements
- Work/Study Release Programs
- Addiction-Specific Support Groups
- Correctional Case Managers
- Counseling
- Crime Victims' Concerns
- Cultural Competence
- Disabled Offenders
- Diversity in Community Corrections
- Drug- and Alcohol-Abusing Offenders and Treatment
- Drug Testing in Community Corrections
- Effectiveness of Community Corrections
- Elderly Offenders
- Environmental Crime Prevention
- Evaluation of Programs
- Female Offenders and Special Needs
- Job Satisfaction in Community Corrections
- Juvenile Aftercare
- Juvenile and Youth Offenders
- Liability
- Martinson, Robert
- Motivational Interviewing
- Offenders with Mental Illness
- Public Shaming as Punishment
- Recidivism
- Sex Offender Registration
- Sex Offenders in the Community
- Sexual and Gender Minorities and Special Needs
- Sexual Predators: Civil Commitment
- Therapeutic Communities
- Therapeutic Jurisprudence
- Thinking for a Change
- Victim Services
- “What Works” Approach and Evidence-Based Practices
- Women in Community Service Program
- Loading...
Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL
-
Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
-
Read modern, diverse business cases
-
Explore hundreds of books and reference titles
Sage Recommends
We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.
Have you created a personal profile? Login or create a profile so that you can save clips, playlists and searches