Entry
Reader's guide
Entries A-Z
Subject index
Counseling
Community corrections have a long history of providing counseling and guidance to offenders released to the community. John Augustus, the “father of probation,” provided counseling and employment assistance to the misdemeanants released to his care and reported on their progress to the courts. This followed a general cultural concern for correction, reform, and rehabilitation. Early proponents of juvenile justice and diversion counseled juveniles and sought to provide them with better opportunities. A strong focus on the needs of female offenders early in the 20th century provided a significant counseling emphasis.
In the context of community corrections, counseling has typically taken three forms: surveillance-based counseling, intended to determine whether the offender has been fulfilling his or her commitments to the court and the community; rehabilitative counseling, aimed at helping the offender to make positive decisions about his or her life choices and personal direction; and therapeutic counseling, aimed at discovering and modifying the root causes of criminal behavior. These kinds of counseling have also been provided in three contexts: as offered by the community corrections official on a one-to-one basis; as group interventions, either in house or by contractors; and as provided by contract agencies.
Offenders can be counseled on a one-on-one basis or in a group setting, and treatment can be conducted at an offender's home or at facilities involving substance abuse treatment agencies, community mental health centers, private mental health professionals, or social service organizations.

The early history of community corrections was marked by a powerful rehabilitative emphasis that continued until the period of civil unrest in the 1960s and 1970s. During this early period, covering about half a century (from the establishment of the first probation departments in the 1920s and 1930s), probationers were typically first-time offenders or minor misdemeanants in need of assistance more than surveillance. Even parolees—persons released early from prison to complete their remaining time on the streets—although viewed as more dangerous and more in need of surveillance than probationers, were provided with counseling in the hope that their lifestyles could be amended.
Community Corrections Officers as Counselors
During the 1950s and early 1960s, rehabilitative counseling became a mainstay of community corrections and was often based on either Rogerian or depth psychological techniques. Rogerian (named for humanistic psychologist Carl Rogers) techniques were nondirective. They provided little or no actual direction but focused on active listening; assuring the client that he or she was being understood and seeking to build a sense of positive self-worth in the offender. Such techniques were centered in the client's supposed need to be heard. Freudian or depth psychological approaches focused on allowing offenders to discover the roots of their problem behaviors through a process of self-discovery. As manifested in community corrections, such efforts often resulted in clear suggestions for action. Because the providers of such counseling often were neither qualified social workers nor trained psychotherapists, the value of such interventions was often questioned.
By the mid-1960s, during a period of growing concern for the due process rights of most defendants and a rising awareness of the social and psychological consequences of arrest and imprisonment, there were further concerted efforts to remove juveniles from the criminal justice system. A large number of probation and parole officers were trained social workers and there was a recommendation from the national government that probation officers have a master's degree in social work as an educational qualification.
...
- Actuarial Risk Assessment
- Classification Systems
- COMPASS Program
- Firearms Charges, Offenders With
- Hare Psychopathy Checklist
- Level of Service Inventory
- Offender Needs
- Offender Responsivity
- Offender Risks
- Prediction Instruments
- Predispositional Reports for Juveniles
- Risk and Needs Assessment Instruments
- Risk Assessment Instruments: Three Generations
- Wisconsin Risk Assessment Instrument
- Absconding
- Augustus, John
- Benefit of Clergy
- Boston's Operation Night Light
- Case Management
- Caseload and Workload Standards
- Circle Sentencing
- Conditional Sentencing and Release
- Conditions of Community Corrections
- Continuum of Sanctions
- Crime Control Model of Corrections
- Curfews
- Diversion Programs
- Drug Courts
- Faith-Based Initiatives
- False Negatives and False Positives
- Family Courts
- Family Group Conferencing
- Family Therapy
- Felony Probation
- Field Visits
- Investigative Reports
- Juvenile Probation Officers
- Manhattan Bail Project
- Mediation
- Mental Health Courts
- Neighborhood Probation
- Offender Supervision
- Pre-Sentence Investigation Reports
- Pretrial Detention
- Pretrial Supervision
- Probation
- Probation: Administration Models
- Probation: Early Termination
- Probation: Organization of Services
- Probation: Private
- Probation and Judicial Reprieve
- Probation and Parole: Intensive Supervision
- Probation and Parole Fees
- Probation Mentor Home Program
- Probation Officers
- Probation Officers: Job Stress
- Project Safeway
- Recognizance
- Reparation Boards
- Restorative Justice
- Revocation
- Sanctuary
- Shock Probation
- SMART Partnership
- Specialized Caseload Models
- Teen Courts
- Victim-Offender Reconciliation Programs
- Wilderness Experience
- Attitudes and Myths about Punishment
- Attitudes of Offenders toward Community Corrections
- Bail Reform Act of 1984
- Banishment
- Beccaria, Cesare
- Bentham, Jeremy
- Certified Criminal Justice Professional
- Civil and Political Rights Affected by Conviction
- Community Corrections Acts
- Community Corrections and Sanctions
- Community Corrections as an Add-on to Imprisonment
- Community Corrections as an Alternative to Imprisonment
- Community Partnerships
- Cook County Juvenile Court
- Costs of Community Corrections
- Determinate Sentencing
- Employment-Related Rights of Offenders
- Ethics of Community-Based Sanctions
- Flat Time
- Front-End and Back-End Programming
- Goals and Objectives of Community Corrections
- History of Community Corrections
- Humanitarianism
- Indeterminate Sentencing
- Law Enforcement Administration Act Initiatives
- Long-Term Offender Designation
- Loss of Capacity to Be Bonded
- Loss of Individual Rights
- Loss of Parental Rights
- Loss of Right to Possess Firearms
- Loss of Welfare Benefits
- Net Widening
- Philosophy of Community Corrections
- Political Determinants of Corrections Policy
- President's Task Force on Corrections
- Prison Overcrowding
- Public Opinion of Community Corrections
- Public Safety and Collaborative Prevention
- Punishment
- Punishment Units
- Reducing Prison Populations
- Reintegration into Communities
- Second Chance Act
- Sentencing Guidelines
- Serious and Violent Offender Reentry Initiative
- Split Sentencing and Blended Sentencing
- Temperance Movement
- Three Strikes and You're Out
- Victims of Crime Act of 1984
- Violent Offender Reconciliation Programs
- Volunteers and Community Corrections
- Boot Camps
- Community Service Order
- Community-Based Centers
- Community-Based Vocational Networks
- Day Reporting Centers
- Electronic Monitoring
- Financial Penalties
- Fine Options Programs
- GPS Tracking
- Group Homes
- Halfway Houses and Residential Centers
- Home Confinement and House Arrest
- NIMBY Syndrome
- Probation and Parole: Intensive Supervision
- Residential Correctional Programs
- Residential Programs for Juveniles
- Restitution
- Restitution Centers
- Absconding
- Brockway, Zebulon
- Discretionary Release
- Elmira System
- Firearms and Community Corrections Personnel
- Furloughs
- Good Time and Merit Time
- Graduated Sanctions for Juvenile Offenders
- Irish Marks System
- Maconochie, Alexander
- Pardon and Restoration of Rights
- Parole
- Parole Boards and Hearings
- Parole Commission, U.S.
- Parole Commission Phaseout Act of 1996
- Parole Guidelines Score
- Parole Officers
- Pre-Parole Plan
- Prisoner's Family and Reentry
- Probation and Parole: Intensive Supervision
- Reentry Courts
- Reentry Programs and Initiatives
- Salient Factor Score
- Truth-in-Sentencing Provisions
- Victim Impact Statements
- Work/Study Release Programs
- Addiction-Specific Support Groups
- Correctional Case Managers
- Counseling
- Crime Victims' Concerns
- Cultural Competence
- Disabled Offenders
- Diversity in Community Corrections
- Drug- and Alcohol-Abusing Offenders and Treatment
- Drug Testing in Community Corrections
- Effectiveness of Community Corrections
- Elderly Offenders
- Environmental Crime Prevention
- Evaluation of Programs
- Female Offenders and Special Needs
- Job Satisfaction in Community Corrections
- Juvenile Aftercare
- Juvenile and Youth Offenders
- Liability
- Martinson, Robert
- Motivational Interviewing
- Offenders with Mental Illness
- Public Shaming as Punishment
- Recidivism
- Sex Offender Registration
- Sex Offenders in the Community
- Sexual and Gender Minorities and Special Needs
- Sexual Predators: Civil Commitment
- Therapeutic Communities
- Therapeutic Jurisprudence
- Thinking for a Change
- Victim Services
- “What Works” Approach and Evidence-Based Practices
- Women in Community Service Program
- Loading...
Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL
-
Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
-
Read modern, diverse business cases
-
Explore hundreds of books and reference titles
Sage Recommends
We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.
Have you created a personal profile? Login or create a profile so that you can save clips, playlists and searches