Entry
Reader's guide
Entries A-Z
Subject index
Costs of Community Corrections
Individuals who are in charge of creating and paying for community corrections programs and policies need to be aware of the economic costs of these programs and the potential benefits that society will enjoy as a result. In traditional community corrections, there are three types of fiscal sanctions: restitution, community service, and fines. However, in recent times, the economic benefits of community corrections have gone far beyond court-mandated sanctions to include treatment programs, services, education, employment training, and more. To estimate the costs of these programs, researchers must use different statistical techniques. The three main techniques are cost-benefit analysis, which weighs the price of a program compared to the benefit or the economic return; cost-effectiveness analysis, which determines whether a program is working in a fiscally responsible way; and cost-savings analysis, which determines whether a program is saving costs and, if so, how much.
Institutional corrections have been expensive for several decades now, and their costs continue to increase. Criminal justice spending on correctional facilities is outpacing the amount of money being spent on education, healthcare, and natural resources. Therefore, increased incarceration does not seem like the long-term fiscal answer to managing these rising costs.
In order to determine the economic costs of community corrections accurately, it is necessary to determine the annual cost of institutional corrections. In 2001, the United States spent nearly $30 billion on adult correctional systems. The average daily cost was $22,650 per offender. This amount constituted approximately 77 percent of states' correctional budgets. The remaining 23 percent was spent on juveniles, administration, and finally community corrections. The amount of money being spent each year on corrections, mainly prisons and jails, is increasing. Now more than ever, it is necessary to determine the economic costs and benefits of community corrections.
A few major evaluation studies have been conducted on the economic benefits of community corrections programs. The first is the Serious and Violent Offender Reentry Initiative (SVORI). Ironically, this program found no significant cost difference between the treatment group and the comparison group. This finding may result from the fact that more services, costing more money, were given to the treatment group. However, in each of the other studies there was a financial return of at least $1.13 for every dollar spent, with the highest return being $7.14 for every dollar spent. A new form of economical community corrections program has been created at restitution centers. These centers combine traditional community corrections with more modern methods. Restitution centers are designed to allow individuals to be gainfully employed but reside at the center until their debt is paid in full.
Economic Analysis
It is estimated that each year in the United States, victims of crimes suffer $105 billion in losses. Some of this is repaid by the individuals who commit the crimes. Restitution is the court-ordered repayment by the offender to the victim or victim's family for losses that occurred during the crime. Restitution has two purposes: First, it helps the victim rehabilitate financially; second, it serves as punishment of the offender. The number of items for which a victim can recuperate losses has expanded. Victims can gain restitution for time in court, medical expenses, court expenses, and burial expenses, for example. Restitution can be given only in the amount of the direct or actual losses, not for indirect losses such as attorney's fees.
...
- Actuarial Risk Assessment
- Classification Systems
- COMPASS Program
- Firearms Charges, Offenders With
- Hare Psychopathy Checklist
- Level of Service Inventory
- Offender Needs
- Offender Responsivity
- Offender Risks
- Prediction Instruments
- Predispositional Reports for Juveniles
- Risk and Needs Assessment Instruments
- Risk Assessment Instruments: Three Generations
- Wisconsin Risk Assessment Instrument
- Absconding
- Augustus, John
- Benefit of Clergy
- Boston's Operation Night Light
- Case Management
- Caseload and Workload Standards
- Circle Sentencing
- Conditional Sentencing and Release
- Conditions of Community Corrections
- Continuum of Sanctions
- Crime Control Model of Corrections
- Curfews
- Diversion Programs
- Drug Courts
- Faith-Based Initiatives
- False Negatives and False Positives
- Family Courts
- Family Group Conferencing
- Family Therapy
- Felony Probation
- Field Visits
- Investigative Reports
- Juvenile Probation Officers
- Manhattan Bail Project
- Mediation
- Mental Health Courts
- Neighborhood Probation
- Offender Supervision
- Pre-Sentence Investigation Reports
- Pretrial Detention
- Pretrial Supervision
- Probation
- Probation: Administration Models
- Probation: Early Termination
- Probation: Organization of Services
- Probation: Private
- Probation and Judicial Reprieve
- Probation and Parole: Intensive Supervision
- Probation and Parole Fees
- Probation Mentor Home Program
- Probation Officers
- Probation Officers: Job Stress
- Project Safeway
- Recognizance
- Reparation Boards
- Restorative Justice
- Revocation
- Sanctuary
- Shock Probation
- SMART Partnership
- Specialized Caseload Models
- Teen Courts
- Victim-Offender Reconciliation Programs
- Wilderness Experience
- Attitudes and Myths about Punishment
- Attitudes of Offenders toward Community Corrections
- Bail Reform Act of 1984
- Banishment
- Beccaria, Cesare
- Bentham, Jeremy
- Certified Criminal Justice Professional
- Civil and Political Rights Affected by Conviction
- Community Corrections Acts
- Community Corrections and Sanctions
- Community Corrections as an Add-on to Imprisonment
- Community Corrections as an Alternative to Imprisonment
- Community Partnerships
- Cook County Juvenile Court
- Costs of Community Corrections
- Determinate Sentencing
- Employment-Related Rights of Offenders
- Ethics of Community-Based Sanctions
- Flat Time
- Front-End and Back-End Programming
- Goals and Objectives of Community Corrections
- History of Community Corrections
- Humanitarianism
- Indeterminate Sentencing
- Law Enforcement Administration Act Initiatives
- Long-Term Offender Designation
- Loss of Capacity to Be Bonded
- Loss of Individual Rights
- Loss of Parental Rights
- Loss of Right to Possess Firearms
- Loss of Welfare Benefits
- Net Widening
- Philosophy of Community Corrections
- Political Determinants of Corrections Policy
- President's Task Force on Corrections
- Prison Overcrowding
- Public Opinion of Community Corrections
- Public Safety and Collaborative Prevention
- Punishment
- Punishment Units
- Reducing Prison Populations
- Reintegration into Communities
- Second Chance Act
- Sentencing Guidelines
- Serious and Violent Offender Reentry Initiative
- Split Sentencing and Blended Sentencing
- Temperance Movement
- Three Strikes and You're Out
- Victims of Crime Act of 1984
- Violent Offender Reconciliation Programs
- Volunteers and Community Corrections
- Boot Camps
- Community Service Order
- Community-Based Centers
- Community-Based Vocational Networks
- Day Reporting Centers
- Electronic Monitoring
- Financial Penalties
- Fine Options Programs
- GPS Tracking
- Group Homes
- Halfway Houses and Residential Centers
- Home Confinement and House Arrest
- NIMBY Syndrome
- Probation and Parole: Intensive Supervision
- Residential Correctional Programs
- Residential Programs for Juveniles
- Restitution
- Restitution Centers
- Absconding
- Brockway, Zebulon
- Discretionary Release
- Elmira System
- Firearms and Community Corrections Personnel
- Furloughs
- Good Time and Merit Time
- Graduated Sanctions for Juvenile Offenders
- Irish Marks System
- Maconochie, Alexander
- Pardon and Restoration of Rights
- Parole
- Parole Boards and Hearings
- Parole Commission, U.S.
- Parole Commission Phaseout Act of 1996
- Parole Guidelines Score
- Parole Officers
- Pre-Parole Plan
- Prisoner's Family and Reentry
- Probation and Parole: Intensive Supervision
- Reentry Courts
- Reentry Programs and Initiatives
- Salient Factor Score
- Truth-in-Sentencing Provisions
- Victim Impact Statements
- Work/Study Release Programs
- Addiction-Specific Support Groups
- Correctional Case Managers
- Counseling
- Crime Victims' Concerns
- Cultural Competence
- Disabled Offenders
- Diversity in Community Corrections
- Drug- and Alcohol-Abusing Offenders and Treatment
- Drug Testing in Community Corrections
- Effectiveness of Community Corrections
- Elderly Offenders
- Environmental Crime Prevention
- Evaluation of Programs
- Female Offenders and Special Needs
- Job Satisfaction in Community Corrections
- Juvenile Aftercare
- Juvenile and Youth Offenders
- Liability
- Martinson, Robert
- Motivational Interviewing
- Offenders with Mental Illness
- Public Shaming as Punishment
- Recidivism
- Sex Offender Registration
- Sex Offenders in the Community
- Sexual and Gender Minorities and Special Needs
- Sexual Predators: Civil Commitment
- Therapeutic Communities
- Therapeutic Jurisprudence
- Thinking for a Change
- Victim Services
- “What Works” Approach and Evidence-Based Practices
- Women in Community Service Program
- Loading...
Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL
-
Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
-
Read modern, diverse business cases
-
Explore hundreds of books and reference titles
Sage Recommends
We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.
Have you created a personal profile? Login or create a profile so that you can save clips, playlists and searches