Entry
Reader's guide
Entries A-Z
Subject index
Conditional Sentencing and Release
Conditional sentencing, commonly referred to as “informal probation,” is also known as summary probation, court probation, or bench probation. Like all probation, this form of probation requires that an offender abide by certain conditions while on release in the community. The granting of this type of probation is at the discretion of the sentencing judge and is generally reserved for adults who commit misdemeanor offenses or for juvenile offenders. Unlike formal probation, informal probation is less stringent in terms of monitoring in the community and the length of the term. However, like formal probation, informal probation may come with various conditions. If these conditions are abided by without further incident or arrest, then the offender avoids a jail sentence for his or her crime.
Conditional release, more commonly known as parole, allows the offender to be released into the community to serve out the remainder of a prison sentence. This release is often determined by a parole board and requires strict monitoring of the offender, typically by a parole officer, for the duration of the conditional release. If the offender violates any of the terms of the release, he or she is subject to the revocation of parole and may be returned to prison to serve out the remainder of the sentence.
Conditional Sentencing (Informal Probation)
With informal probation, the judge orders the offender to a revocable release into the community as that person's primary sentence, often following a guilty plea. This sentence will usually come with mandatory conditions to which the offender must adhere, such as attending drug or alcohol treatment, paying fines, or completing community service. The primary condition that must be met is that the offender must not commit any further crimes. Unlike formal probation, which involves close supervision by a probation officer and often follows a term in jail, informal probation is more typically used in lieu of prison time altogether.
This type of probation is often offered to juvenile offenders if they confess to a relatively minor crime and/or as a diversionary sentencing option. If the sentencing judge determines that an incarceration term may be detrimental to the offender's rehabilitation or place the offender at higher risk of recidivism, then the use of informal probation may be a viable option. Not limited to juveniles, this type of probation may also be offered to adults who have pleaded guilty to a misdemeanor offense, such as driving under the influence, possession of drug paraphernalia, or vandalism. In many jurisdictions, the use of informal probation is formally prohibited for individuals who have committed a felony. Generally, informal probation may be substituted at the judge's discretion whenever the state's legislation permits the use of probation as a sentencing option for the particular offense committed.
Far more lenient than incarceration, informal probation is also considered less stringent than formal probation, both in reporting and in monitoring and the duration of the term. Unlike formal probation, informal probation generally does not involve the offender being assigned to a probation officer, and the offender is therefore not closely monitored while on probation. Rather, he or she is typically responsible for reporting directly to the court regarding adherence to the conditions set by the judge and maintenance of good behavior. Informal probation terms also tend to be shorter than formal probation terms, at times only as long as a month, as opposed to the possibility of years under a formal probation term. However, placing an individual on informal probation does not erase or negate a criminal conviction, as that person's admission of guilt will remain on his or her criminal record, much as it would if jail or formal probation were ordered.
...
- Actuarial Risk Assessment
- Classification Systems
- COMPASS Program
- Firearms Charges, Offenders With
- Hare Psychopathy Checklist
- Level of Service Inventory
- Offender Needs
- Offender Responsivity
- Offender Risks
- Prediction Instruments
- Predispositional Reports for Juveniles
- Risk and Needs Assessment Instruments
- Risk Assessment Instruments: Three Generations
- Wisconsin Risk Assessment Instrument
- Absconding
- Augustus, John
- Benefit of Clergy
- Boston's Operation Night Light
- Case Management
- Caseload and Workload Standards
- Circle Sentencing
- Conditional Sentencing and Release
- Conditions of Community Corrections
- Continuum of Sanctions
- Crime Control Model of Corrections
- Curfews
- Diversion Programs
- Drug Courts
- Faith-Based Initiatives
- False Negatives and False Positives
- Family Courts
- Family Group Conferencing
- Family Therapy
- Felony Probation
- Field Visits
- Investigative Reports
- Juvenile Probation Officers
- Manhattan Bail Project
- Mediation
- Mental Health Courts
- Neighborhood Probation
- Offender Supervision
- Pre-Sentence Investigation Reports
- Pretrial Detention
- Pretrial Supervision
- Probation
- Probation: Administration Models
- Probation: Early Termination
- Probation: Organization of Services
- Probation: Private
- Probation and Judicial Reprieve
- Probation and Parole: Intensive Supervision
- Probation and Parole Fees
- Probation Mentor Home Program
- Probation Officers
- Probation Officers: Job Stress
- Project Safeway
- Recognizance
- Reparation Boards
- Restorative Justice
- Revocation
- Sanctuary
- Shock Probation
- SMART Partnership
- Specialized Caseload Models
- Teen Courts
- Victim-Offender Reconciliation Programs
- Wilderness Experience
- Attitudes and Myths about Punishment
- Attitudes of Offenders toward Community Corrections
- Bail Reform Act of 1984
- Banishment
- Beccaria, Cesare
- Bentham, Jeremy
- Certified Criminal Justice Professional
- Civil and Political Rights Affected by Conviction
- Community Corrections Acts
- Community Corrections and Sanctions
- Community Corrections as an Add-on to Imprisonment
- Community Corrections as an Alternative to Imprisonment
- Community Partnerships
- Cook County Juvenile Court
- Costs of Community Corrections
- Determinate Sentencing
- Employment-Related Rights of Offenders
- Ethics of Community-Based Sanctions
- Flat Time
- Front-End and Back-End Programming
- Goals and Objectives of Community Corrections
- History of Community Corrections
- Humanitarianism
- Indeterminate Sentencing
- Law Enforcement Administration Act Initiatives
- Long-Term Offender Designation
- Loss of Capacity to Be Bonded
- Loss of Individual Rights
- Loss of Parental Rights
- Loss of Right to Possess Firearms
- Loss of Welfare Benefits
- Net Widening
- Philosophy of Community Corrections
- Political Determinants of Corrections Policy
- President's Task Force on Corrections
- Prison Overcrowding
- Public Opinion of Community Corrections
- Public Safety and Collaborative Prevention
- Punishment
- Punishment Units
- Reducing Prison Populations
- Reintegration into Communities
- Second Chance Act
- Sentencing Guidelines
- Serious and Violent Offender Reentry Initiative
- Split Sentencing and Blended Sentencing
- Temperance Movement
- Three Strikes and You're Out
- Victims of Crime Act of 1984
- Violent Offender Reconciliation Programs
- Volunteers and Community Corrections
- Boot Camps
- Community Service Order
- Community-Based Centers
- Community-Based Vocational Networks
- Day Reporting Centers
- Electronic Monitoring
- Financial Penalties
- Fine Options Programs
- GPS Tracking
- Group Homes
- Halfway Houses and Residential Centers
- Home Confinement and House Arrest
- NIMBY Syndrome
- Probation and Parole: Intensive Supervision
- Residential Correctional Programs
- Residential Programs for Juveniles
- Restitution
- Restitution Centers
- Absconding
- Brockway, Zebulon
- Discretionary Release
- Elmira System
- Firearms and Community Corrections Personnel
- Furloughs
- Good Time and Merit Time
- Graduated Sanctions for Juvenile Offenders
- Irish Marks System
- Maconochie, Alexander
- Pardon and Restoration of Rights
- Parole
- Parole Boards and Hearings
- Parole Commission, U.S.
- Parole Commission Phaseout Act of 1996
- Parole Guidelines Score
- Parole Officers
- Pre-Parole Plan
- Prisoner's Family and Reentry
- Probation and Parole: Intensive Supervision
- Reentry Courts
- Reentry Programs and Initiatives
- Salient Factor Score
- Truth-in-Sentencing Provisions
- Victim Impact Statements
- Work/Study Release Programs
- Addiction-Specific Support Groups
- Correctional Case Managers
- Counseling
- Crime Victims' Concerns
- Cultural Competence
- Disabled Offenders
- Diversity in Community Corrections
- Drug- and Alcohol-Abusing Offenders and Treatment
- Drug Testing in Community Corrections
- Effectiveness of Community Corrections
- Elderly Offenders
- Environmental Crime Prevention
- Evaluation of Programs
- Female Offenders and Special Needs
- Job Satisfaction in Community Corrections
- Juvenile Aftercare
- Juvenile and Youth Offenders
- Liability
- Martinson, Robert
- Motivational Interviewing
- Offenders with Mental Illness
- Public Shaming as Punishment
- Recidivism
- Sex Offender Registration
- Sex Offenders in the Community
- Sexual and Gender Minorities and Special Needs
- Sexual Predators: Civil Commitment
- Therapeutic Communities
- Therapeutic Jurisprudence
- Thinking for a Change
- Victim Services
- “What Works” Approach and Evidence-Based Practices
- Women in Community Service Program
- Loading...
Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL
-
Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
-
Read modern, diverse business cases
-
Explore hundreds of books and reference titles
Sage Recommends
We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.
Have you created a personal profile? Login or create a profile so that you can save clips, playlists and searches