Entry
Reader's guide
Entries A-Z
Subject index
Community-Based Centers
Community corrections agencies employ a large number of centers that are located in various neighborhoods. These centers have various missions, objectives, rehabilitative philosophies, punitive modalities, and techniques, and they serve a diverse array of offenders under different forms of community corrections supervision. Therefore, a number of community-oriented community corrections programs exist; some of these are residential, whereas others are nonresidential programs that fill a variety of needs regarding effective offender supervision in the community.
Community-based centers can provide a cost-effective rehabilitation facility in or near residential areas that are convenient to offenders. These centers can reduce the likelihood of return to crime and imprisonment while improving community safety.

Community-based programs form a component of the correctional system termed intermediate sanctions, to denote punishments that are more stringent than basic probation or parole but less restrictive than prison. Intermediate sanctions have their roots in arrangements that resemble halfway houses, which were started by the Quakers in the 19th century. These programs were created to assist people just released from prison to become reintegrated into society. In the 1980s, intermediate sanction programs became very popular as courts and parole boards sought options to overcrowded prison systems. These programs exist because straight incarceration is too severe a punishment for many low need/low risk offenders and basic probation with parole field supervision is often not sufficiently rigorous or effective for some high need/high risk offenders. Community-based centers represent an appropriate punishment philosophy because they comprise a “happy medium” of offender sanctions, especially when the costs of incarceration in prison settings are too high for most jurisdictions to support. While some intermediate sanctions—such as intensive probation supervision, house arrest, home confinement, electronic monitoring, and community service work—are not what are termed community-based centers, others—such as community residential centers (including halfway houses and transitional centers), diversion and restitution programs, shock-based programs, day reporting centers, and a variety of adjunct community programs (including substance abuse treatment centers that cater heavily to community corrections populations)—do constitute what are known as community-based centers.
Characteristics and Goals
Although community-based centers are extremely diverse, four basic characteristics can be distinguished. First, all of the programs are housed in buildings located in or near residential areas that can easily be accessed by offenders under supervision. Second, there are a number of practitioners—such as professional and paraprofessional correctional staff (officers or agents), counseling personnel, social workers, and medical personnel—who provide services to the offenders. Another characteristic is that there is a well-defined system of accountability to sentencing courts, parole boards, or juvenile authorities; this accountability is maintained and reported to officials by community corrections personnel working in these programs. Fourth, community-based centers are aligned with community resources, and staff members act as liaisons between the centers and community resources. Last, the management of these programs is assumed by administrators who are available for crisis and special needs assistance, should crisis situations arise.
The goals of these community-based programs vary by type, mission, and philosophy but generally exist to assist persons under community corrections supervision with four main objectives: (1) to reintegrate offenders back into society, (2) to facilitate rehabilitation of these offenders, (3) to provide sentencing and punishment options (particularly when overcrowding in institutional correctional facilities exists), and (4) to assist offenders in becoming more accountable for their actions. Reintegration, in which criminal offenders who have been institutionalized attempt to resume normal activities with their communities, has been a goal in recent decades for the correctional system generally, and this responsibility has particularly fallen to the community-based centers. Rehabilitation has long been a goal of the correctional system, and helping offenders with problem solving and issues such as addiction is addressed in these centers. Sentencing and punishment options for courts and parole boards are extremely important, especially when overcrowding in correctional institutions occurs and alternatives to incarceration are needed. Community-based centers are particularly useful when graduated sanctions (increased or decreased punitive and restrictive sanctions that are imposed in accordance with offender behavior) are deemed beneficial. Community-based centers also provide such high levels of supervision that offender accountability is much greater than in regular community corrections facilities.
...
- Actuarial Risk Assessment
- Classification Systems
- COMPASS Program
- Firearms Charges, Offenders With
- Hare Psychopathy Checklist
- Level of Service Inventory
- Offender Needs
- Offender Responsivity
- Offender Risks
- Prediction Instruments
- Predispositional Reports for Juveniles
- Risk and Needs Assessment Instruments
- Risk Assessment Instruments: Three Generations
- Wisconsin Risk Assessment Instrument
- Absconding
- Augustus, John
- Benefit of Clergy
- Boston's Operation Night Light
- Case Management
- Caseload and Workload Standards
- Circle Sentencing
- Conditional Sentencing and Release
- Conditions of Community Corrections
- Continuum of Sanctions
- Crime Control Model of Corrections
- Curfews
- Diversion Programs
- Drug Courts
- Faith-Based Initiatives
- False Negatives and False Positives
- Family Courts
- Family Group Conferencing
- Family Therapy
- Felony Probation
- Field Visits
- Investigative Reports
- Juvenile Probation Officers
- Manhattan Bail Project
- Mediation
- Mental Health Courts
- Neighborhood Probation
- Offender Supervision
- Pre-Sentence Investigation Reports
- Pretrial Detention
- Pretrial Supervision
- Probation
- Probation: Administration Models
- Probation: Early Termination
- Probation: Organization of Services
- Probation: Private
- Probation and Judicial Reprieve
- Probation and Parole: Intensive Supervision
- Probation and Parole Fees
- Probation Mentor Home Program
- Probation Officers
- Probation Officers: Job Stress
- Project Safeway
- Recognizance
- Reparation Boards
- Restorative Justice
- Revocation
- Sanctuary
- Shock Probation
- SMART Partnership
- Specialized Caseload Models
- Teen Courts
- Victim-Offender Reconciliation Programs
- Wilderness Experience
- Attitudes and Myths about Punishment
- Attitudes of Offenders toward Community Corrections
- Bail Reform Act of 1984
- Banishment
- Beccaria, Cesare
- Bentham, Jeremy
- Certified Criminal Justice Professional
- Civil and Political Rights Affected by Conviction
- Community Corrections Acts
- Community Corrections and Sanctions
- Community Corrections as an Add-on to Imprisonment
- Community Corrections as an Alternative to Imprisonment
- Community Partnerships
- Cook County Juvenile Court
- Costs of Community Corrections
- Determinate Sentencing
- Employment-Related Rights of Offenders
- Ethics of Community-Based Sanctions
- Flat Time
- Front-End and Back-End Programming
- Goals and Objectives of Community Corrections
- History of Community Corrections
- Humanitarianism
- Indeterminate Sentencing
- Law Enforcement Administration Act Initiatives
- Long-Term Offender Designation
- Loss of Capacity to Be Bonded
- Loss of Individual Rights
- Loss of Parental Rights
- Loss of Right to Possess Firearms
- Loss of Welfare Benefits
- Net Widening
- Philosophy of Community Corrections
- Political Determinants of Corrections Policy
- President's Task Force on Corrections
- Prison Overcrowding
- Public Opinion of Community Corrections
- Public Safety and Collaborative Prevention
- Punishment
- Punishment Units
- Reducing Prison Populations
- Reintegration into Communities
- Second Chance Act
- Sentencing Guidelines
- Serious and Violent Offender Reentry Initiative
- Split Sentencing and Blended Sentencing
- Temperance Movement
- Three Strikes and You're Out
- Victims of Crime Act of 1984
- Violent Offender Reconciliation Programs
- Volunteers and Community Corrections
- Boot Camps
- Community Service Order
- Community-Based Centers
- Community-Based Vocational Networks
- Day Reporting Centers
- Electronic Monitoring
- Financial Penalties
- Fine Options Programs
- GPS Tracking
- Group Homes
- Halfway Houses and Residential Centers
- Home Confinement and House Arrest
- NIMBY Syndrome
- Probation and Parole: Intensive Supervision
- Residential Correctional Programs
- Residential Programs for Juveniles
- Restitution
- Restitution Centers
- Absconding
- Brockway, Zebulon
- Discretionary Release
- Elmira System
- Firearms and Community Corrections Personnel
- Furloughs
- Good Time and Merit Time
- Graduated Sanctions for Juvenile Offenders
- Irish Marks System
- Maconochie, Alexander
- Pardon and Restoration of Rights
- Parole
- Parole Boards and Hearings
- Parole Commission, U.S.
- Parole Commission Phaseout Act of 1996
- Parole Guidelines Score
- Parole Officers
- Pre-Parole Plan
- Prisoner's Family and Reentry
- Probation and Parole: Intensive Supervision
- Reentry Courts
- Reentry Programs and Initiatives
- Salient Factor Score
- Truth-in-Sentencing Provisions
- Victim Impact Statements
- Work/Study Release Programs
- Addiction-Specific Support Groups
- Correctional Case Managers
- Counseling
- Crime Victims' Concerns
- Cultural Competence
- Disabled Offenders
- Diversity in Community Corrections
- Drug- and Alcohol-Abusing Offenders and Treatment
- Drug Testing in Community Corrections
- Effectiveness of Community Corrections
- Elderly Offenders
- Environmental Crime Prevention
- Evaluation of Programs
- Female Offenders and Special Needs
- Job Satisfaction in Community Corrections
- Juvenile Aftercare
- Juvenile and Youth Offenders
- Liability
- Martinson, Robert
- Motivational Interviewing
- Offenders with Mental Illness
- Public Shaming as Punishment
- Recidivism
- Sex Offender Registration
- Sex Offenders in the Community
- Sexual and Gender Minorities and Special Needs
- Sexual Predators: Civil Commitment
- Therapeutic Communities
- Therapeutic Jurisprudence
- Thinking for a Change
- Victim Services
- “What Works” Approach and Evidence-Based Practices
- Women in Community Service Program
- Loading...
Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL
-
Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
-
Read modern, diverse business cases
-
Explore hundreds of books and reference titles
Sage Recommends
We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.
Have you created a personal profile? Login or create a profile so that you can save clips, playlists and searches