Entry
Reader's guide
Entries A-Z
Subject index
Certified Criminal Justice Professional
The debate in America continues over whether law-enforcement officers will routinely have a college degree in the future. As early as the 1920s, Berkeley police chief August Vollmer was considered a visionary pioneer who advocated educating criminal justice practitioners. Since Vollmer's crusade to promote educating law enforcement, there has been improvement, but far from what he envisioned. At the same time, rank, title, and education do not necessarily equate with competence in any career field, including law enforcement. Generally, the political landscape found within law enforcement organizations has a far greater impact as a predictor of success in the career field than does education. In this discussion, we distinguish police and crime-scene investigators from corrections personnel, with the focus on law enforcement.
The U.S. Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), along with other federal law enforcement agencies, has strict standards regarding eligibility for hire, professional codes of conduct while employed in the agency, and adherence to FBI policies.

The Profession in General
A review of the federal law-enforcement officers' corps will dispel the notion that the college-degreed officer is not problematic. The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) is one of several federal law-enforcement agencies with strict hiring standards, codes of conduct, internal agency policies, and relatively good employee benefits and salaries. The career journeyman (nonsupervisory) federal agent earns more than $140,000 per year, which represents an average salary of $50,000 more than the national median for a chief of police in the United States. However, none of these benefits has deterred FBI employees from engaging in unethical, immoral, and illegal conduct. If the conversation takes a focus on ethics and integrity, there is little evidence to support that the college-educated law-enforcement officer is devoid of these temptations.
Although it is unpopular to note, cronyism and most-favored status have a far greater influence on most law-enforcement careers than does a college degree. Some candidates for law-enforcement employment or career officers may ask the critical question: Should they pursue an academic degree or a series of certifications directly related to the career? Costs and time, as well as return on investment, suggest that these discussions are appropriate in today's complex world.
Nationwide, it is generally found that, in order to be considered for employment as a law-enforcement officer, the candidate is required to have completed a high school education or general equivalency diploma, be free from felony convictions, and pass a series of internal assessments. If the applicant successfully completes these assessments, he or she can attend a certified police academy training program that generally takes 16 weeks. After a candidate completes the police academy training program, some agencies require prospective officers to complete a field training apprentice program with a senior officer acting as a mentor. Upon successful completion of the training program, the officer is released to his or her assigned duties. Throughout their career, officers attend nonacademic, specialized training programs to comply with various mandates generally driven by legal precedent and policy mandates.
Overall, an officer can complete assigned duties with a general educational background and applied field training, along with experience provided by the agency. Given the status of the economy in 2010, most agencies must find ways to reduce their expenses, and funding for education and training are frequently targets for fiscal reduction measures. Agency-paid college education programs are likely to be reduced or altogether phased out because of costs.
...
- Actuarial Risk Assessment
- Classification Systems
- COMPASS Program
- Firearms Charges, Offenders With
- Hare Psychopathy Checklist
- Level of Service Inventory
- Offender Needs
- Offender Responsivity
- Offender Risks
- Prediction Instruments
- Predispositional Reports for Juveniles
- Risk and Needs Assessment Instruments
- Risk Assessment Instruments: Three Generations
- Wisconsin Risk Assessment Instrument
- Absconding
- Augustus, John
- Benefit of Clergy
- Boston's Operation Night Light
- Case Management
- Caseload and Workload Standards
- Circle Sentencing
- Conditional Sentencing and Release
- Conditions of Community Corrections
- Continuum of Sanctions
- Crime Control Model of Corrections
- Curfews
- Diversion Programs
- Drug Courts
- Faith-Based Initiatives
- False Negatives and False Positives
- Family Courts
- Family Group Conferencing
- Family Therapy
- Felony Probation
- Field Visits
- Investigative Reports
- Juvenile Probation Officers
- Manhattan Bail Project
- Mediation
- Mental Health Courts
- Neighborhood Probation
- Offender Supervision
- Pre-Sentence Investigation Reports
- Pretrial Detention
- Pretrial Supervision
- Probation
- Probation: Administration Models
- Probation: Early Termination
- Probation: Organization of Services
- Probation: Private
- Probation and Judicial Reprieve
- Probation and Parole: Intensive Supervision
- Probation and Parole Fees
- Probation Mentor Home Program
- Probation Officers
- Probation Officers: Job Stress
- Project Safeway
- Recognizance
- Reparation Boards
- Restorative Justice
- Revocation
- Sanctuary
- Shock Probation
- SMART Partnership
- Specialized Caseload Models
- Teen Courts
- Victim-Offender Reconciliation Programs
- Wilderness Experience
- Attitudes and Myths about Punishment
- Attitudes of Offenders toward Community Corrections
- Bail Reform Act of 1984
- Banishment
- Beccaria, Cesare
- Bentham, Jeremy
- Certified Criminal Justice Professional
- Civil and Political Rights Affected by Conviction
- Community Corrections Acts
- Community Corrections and Sanctions
- Community Corrections as an Add-on to Imprisonment
- Community Corrections as an Alternative to Imprisonment
- Community Partnerships
- Cook County Juvenile Court
- Costs of Community Corrections
- Determinate Sentencing
- Employment-Related Rights of Offenders
- Ethics of Community-Based Sanctions
- Flat Time
- Front-End and Back-End Programming
- Goals and Objectives of Community Corrections
- History of Community Corrections
- Humanitarianism
- Indeterminate Sentencing
- Law Enforcement Administration Act Initiatives
- Long-Term Offender Designation
- Loss of Capacity to Be Bonded
- Loss of Individual Rights
- Loss of Parental Rights
- Loss of Right to Possess Firearms
- Loss of Welfare Benefits
- Net Widening
- Philosophy of Community Corrections
- Political Determinants of Corrections Policy
- President's Task Force on Corrections
- Prison Overcrowding
- Public Opinion of Community Corrections
- Public Safety and Collaborative Prevention
- Punishment
- Punishment Units
- Reducing Prison Populations
- Reintegration into Communities
- Second Chance Act
- Sentencing Guidelines
- Serious and Violent Offender Reentry Initiative
- Split Sentencing and Blended Sentencing
- Temperance Movement
- Three Strikes and You're Out
- Victims of Crime Act of 1984
- Violent Offender Reconciliation Programs
- Volunteers and Community Corrections
- Boot Camps
- Community Service Order
- Community-Based Centers
- Community-Based Vocational Networks
- Day Reporting Centers
- Electronic Monitoring
- Financial Penalties
- Fine Options Programs
- GPS Tracking
- Group Homes
- Halfway Houses and Residential Centers
- Home Confinement and House Arrest
- NIMBY Syndrome
- Probation and Parole: Intensive Supervision
- Residential Correctional Programs
- Residential Programs for Juveniles
- Restitution
- Restitution Centers
- Absconding
- Brockway, Zebulon
- Discretionary Release
- Elmira System
- Firearms and Community Corrections Personnel
- Furloughs
- Good Time and Merit Time
- Graduated Sanctions for Juvenile Offenders
- Irish Marks System
- Maconochie, Alexander
- Pardon and Restoration of Rights
- Parole
- Parole Boards and Hearings
- Parole Commission, U.S.
- Parole Commission Phaseout Act of 1996
- Parole Guidelines Score
- Parole Officers
- Pre-Parole Plan
- Prisoner's Family and Reentry
- Probation and Parole: Intensive Supervision
- Reentry Courts
- Reentry Programs and Initiatives
- Salient Factor Score
- Truth-in-Sentencing Provisions
- Victim Impact Statements
- Work/Study Release Programs
- Addiction-Specific Support Groups
- Correctional Case Managers
- Counseling
- Crime Victims' Concerns
- Cultural Competence
- Disabled Offenders
- Diversity in Community Corrections
- Drug- and Alcohol-Abusing Offenders and Treatment
- Drug Testing in Community Corrections
- Effectiveness of Community Corrections
- Elderly Offenders
- Environmental Crime Prevention
- Evaluation of Programs
- Female Offenders and Special Needs
- Job Satisfaction in Community Corrections
- Juvenile Aftercare
- Juvenile and Youth Offenders
- Liability
- Martinson, Robert
- Motivational Interviewing
- Offenders with Mental Illness
- Public Shaming as Punishment
- Recidivism
- Sex Offender Registration
- Sex Offenders in the Community
- Sexual and Gender Minorities and Special Needs
- Sexual Predators: Civil Commitment
- Therapeutic Communities
- Therapeutic Jurisprudence
- Thinking for a Change
- Victim Services
- “What Works” Approach and Evidence-Based Practices
- Women in Community Service Program
- Loading...
Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL
-
Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
-
Read modern, diverse business cases
-
Explore hundreds of books and reference titles
Sage Recommends
We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.
Have you created a personal profile? Login or create a profile so that you can save clips, playlists and searches