Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

At the very core of the still-emerging discipline of media studies lies the concept of agenda setting. Developed some 50 years after Walter Lippmann wrote of press-mediated “pictures in our heads” in his seminal Public Opinion, the agenda-setting concept identifies a high correlation between the priority that media-makers assign to specific issues and the importance that their audiences place on those same issues. According to agenda-setting theory, the media might not tell us what to think about such an issue as abortion rights, for example, but they do influence our becoming aware of the issue, assigning it a high degree of importance, and eventually forming an opinion on it.

Theoretical Background

Within the tradition of media effects research, agenda setting is arguably a middle-of-the-road theory in terms of the kind of media influence it describes. It does not argue that audience attitudes and behaviors are largely unaffected by the media, as did the limited effects theories of the 1950s. Neither does it seek to minimize the existence of individual agency in the media consumption process (like the magic bullet theory of the 1940s and the more sophisticated powerful effects theories of the 1990s). The agenda-setting concept draws on an understanding of media-makers (particularly journalists) as gatekeepers of information, whose priorities and decisions shape (and limit) the issue coverage that is available to the public. The agenda-setting theory takes the gatekeeping concept one step further by formulating a connection between news items that are allowed through the gate onto TV screens and into newspapers and the issues audiences hold to be of importance to their own lives.

Past and Future Research Avenues

The first study that investigated that effect (and the first one to use the term agenda setting) was published in 1972 by Maxwell McCombs and Donald Shaw. One hundred undecided voters in North Carolina were surveyed with respect to the issues that most concerned them in an upcoming election. In addition, the authors undertook a content analysis of local media. The results pointed to a high correlation between the issues that had been heavily covered in the news and the issues that the surveyed subjects indicated as playing an important part in their voting decisions. Since 1972, more than 250 studies have addressed the agenda-setting function of the media in dozens of countries around the world. Most of these investigations, however, have followed McCombs and Shaw's precedent in focusing on the correlations between issue prioritizing by the media and issue prioritizing by adult audiences, in the context of public (often election-related) affairs. The agenda-setting paradigm still holds promise for researchers studying media effects on children and teenagers as well as on adult perceptions and attitudes outside the political realm.

  • public opinion
  • agenda setting
RazvanSibii

Further Readings

McCombs, M. E., Shaw, D. L.The agendasetting function of mass media. Public Opinion Quarterly36176–187(1972). http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/267990
McCombs, M. E., Shaw, D. L., & Weaver, D. (Eds.). (1997). Communication and democracy: Exploring the intellectual frontiers in agenda-setting theory. Mahwah,

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading