Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

In The Interpretation of Cultures, first published in 1973, anthropologist Clifford Geertz expressed his arguments for what the study of culture should be about:

Believing, with Max Weber, that man is an animal suspended in webs of significance he himself has spun, I take culture to be those webs, and the analysis of it to be therefore not an experimental science in search of law but an interpretive one in search of meaning. (p. 5)

Culture is not something imposed on people, argued Geertz, but it is created and recreated by them through their involvement in social relationships and through social interaction. The challenge for sociologists, anthropologists, and others concerned with understanding culture is not to take an approach that it is possible to treat culture as another social fact (thereby making a science of society possible in the way functionalists argued) but to venture into hermeneutics and interpret how the world is created, what cultural artifacts and symbols mean, and how aspects of culture provide insight into human nature. Social interaction, therefore, is essentially a transaction of meanings between people who are engaged in the production of social meaning.

Conceptual Overview and Discussion

Geertz's approach to culture owes much to Weber—in particular, his thinking on how people make interpretations and attribute meaning to culture is influenced by Weber's idea of verstehen (understanding)—but his approach to hermeneutics was influenced by Paul Riceour's notion that culture is like a text that must be interpreted if we are to understand the human world, and the work of linguist Gilbert Ryle gave Geertz the idea of interpreting culture and writing about it in terms of thick descriptions. By focusing on webs of significance, Geertz proposed an anthropology that should be concerned with understanding meaning rather than behavior, what people actually mean when they say and do things rather than how they behave.

It is understanding, interpreting, and explaining what these webs of significance mean for people, to grasp the multiplicity of concepts and structures, and to interpret the symbols and complexity of everyday life, that Geertz saw as the essence of the anthropologist's task as ethnographer. Ethnography for Geertz was like reading a manuscript that was not written in any kind of immediately understandable language, and it was the ethnographer's job, he argued, to find the means to translate and interpret this language. Admittedly, Geertz agreed, the thick descriptions of the ethnographer are also interpretations of the ethnographer, and he argued that what anthropologists wrote about culture were essentially their interpretations of people's interpretations. In this, the quest for the anthropologist is to convey what people think they understand and mean. On occasion, anthropologists can transcend these local meanings and offer their own interpretation of what people do, say, and think, but essentially what we are getting through ethnography is the natives' worldview, or at least their interpretations of the meanings that shape that worldview. Thick descriptions of the minutiae of everyday life offer insight into what society at large is really like, argued Geertz.

Application

One of Geertz's best-known writings that sets out his interpretive approach and allows us a glimpse of the webs of significance people spin, is “Deep Play: Notes on the Balinese Cockfight.” Instead of being a superficial social activity, the cockfight, as it is played out in Bali, and if we set out to interpret its meanings, argues Geertz, allows us insight into deep aspects of Balinese culture, worldviews, and cultural ideas of self and society. Geertz spends a great deal of time describing how Balinese men prepare for cockfights—how they grooms their birds, the jokes they tell, the language related to cockfighting, the bets that are placed, the fights themselves, and so on. Through his thick description of the cockfight, Geertz's essay is a commentary of the nature of Balinese village life—and, ultimately, Balinese culture. It is a metaphorical account of Balinese culture as text: “a Balinese reading of Balinese experience,” Geertz proclaims in his essay, “a story they tell themselves about themselves.”

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading