Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Outcome-driven research starts with an observed and known outcome or result and works its way backward, building explanations from events or observations that have already occurred and are already known, using archival records, interviews, artifacts and traces as data sources to reconstruct a story.

Figure 1 Outcome-driven explanations

None
Sources: Howard E. Aldrich (2001). Who wants to be an evolutionary theorist? Remarks on the Occasion of the Year 2000 OMT Distinguished Scholarly Career Award Presentation. Journal of Management Inquiry, 10(2), 115–127. Adapted from Elder, G. H., Jr., Caspi, A., & Burton, L. M. (1988). Adolescent transitions in development perspective: Sociological and historical insights. In M. R.Gunnar & A.Collins (Eds.), Minnesota Symposium on child psychology, 21 (pp. 151–179). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Conceptual Overview and Discussion

Outcome-driven research is a retrospective accounting of the plausible reasons for a known outcome. This type of case study research is typically cross-sectional in design, selecting one point in time and attempting to identify and reconstruct what led to a particular outcome (see Figure 1). This is a non-evolutionary approach to case study research; most research endeavors take this approach and are primarily concerned with events that have occurred in the past, examining historical artifacts to develop possible explanations.

One of the limitations of theorizing by looking to the past is that elements of the topic of interest may not still exist at the time of the examination, thus limiting the variety, diversity, and heterogeneity of what is being studied. In the case of organizations, for example, only the ones that survive to produce the outcome of interest will be examined, and the ones that did not survive, or were transformed into something else, are not considered, although there is potentially much to be learned from their contribution and historical significance. Left truncation, a form of sample selection bias, may occur if important elements of a population are not included for study because they are not evident at the time of the outcome, potentially resulting in skewed conclusions.

Another limitation of outcome-driven research is that retrospective reconstruction results in an accounting of the events that may be modified or reconstructed on the basis of subsequent events. Once an outcome is known, there is a risk of constructing an explanation or story to fit the outcome. Knowledge or events may well be forgotten over the course of time if there is no documentation or if an event has not been sufficiently reinforced in the memory of individuals or organizations who experienced it. A further limitation of outcome-driven research is that events may be collapsed in terms of the passage of time, resulting in an inaccurate representation of how and when events influenced or affected the outcome. The goal of outcome-driven research is to provide an explanation of how the event (or events) influenced or caused the outcome being studied. The order in which events occur in outcome-driven research is generally not significant; of more importance is the identification of all the events that contribute toward the outcome being researched and how they affected the eventual outcome.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading