Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

ALTHOUGH POLITICAL POLLING hasbeen around in one form or another since the early 19th century, scientific polling, the type of polling that is now the standard, has only been in use since the 1930s. Today, there are a number of organizations that determine the attitudes of voters on a variety of issues using similar sampling techniques.

Polling has become a vital tool not only for political campaigning, but also for policy making, because polls help to provide politicians with a direction. For policymakers, knowing the strength of constituents' views will determine how much flexibility they have on an issue. If the public is not closely following an issue, a policymaker will have more freedom to act than when the public is deeply committed. Yet, even for those issues with which the public is concerned, if polling data indicate other issues are more important, then, once again, the policymaker has more flexibility.

For candidates, polling helps direct the right message to the right audience. Good polling allows the candidate to determine his or her own supporters, who there is less need to target unless their support is weak; the opponent's supporters, who it is counterproductive to target; and the undecided, who with a properly directed message, can be influenced. Polling data help to better target messages to undecided voters by determining the issues most important to them, as well as the types of policy options they will respond to.

Polling History

Efforts to gauge voters' views on specific candidates and issues have been around since the early 19th century. In 1824, newspapers in Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, and Raleigh, North Carolina, used straw polls to determine the strength of that year's presidential candidates. The Harrisburg Pennsylvanian declared Andrew Jackson the winner with 335 votes, John Quincy Adams came in second with 169 votes, followed by Henry Clay with 19, and William H. Crawford with nine. The straw poll itself was unscientific and the process would be constantly refined in future years.

Beginning in 1916, a magazine, The Literary Digest, asked voters what they thought of specific candidates. By mailing out ballots to as many as 20 million people, identified from car registrations and phone directories, it was able to correctly determine the outcome of every presidential election for two decades. However, George Gallup began to doubt the validity of the magazine's polling. After examining U.S. voting patterns since 1836, he sent out a small number of forms to a scientifically selected group of people. Based on those results he correctly predicted the outcome of the 1934 congressional elections. He used those results to challenge The Literary Digest.

As a way to get newspapers to use his polling data, he guaranteed them he would correctly predict the winner of the 1936 presidential election, and would refund their money if he were wrong. Using their different polling methods The Literary Digest predicted that Republican Alf Landon would win with 57 percent of the vote. Gallup concluded that Democrat Franklin Roosevelt would be elected with 54 percent of the vote. Gallup proved to be correct as Roosevelt won with 61 percent of the vote.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading