Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

WINNING THE PRESIDENCY requires a majority in the Electoral College, but the U.S. Constitution does not dictate whom electors of the various states should consider. Since George Washington's presidency, informal coalitions and, later, political parties coordinated their efforts by nominating candidates for the general election. The nominating process has evolved over time, becoming less centralized, more participatory, and, arguably, more democratic. The matter of nominations was not an issue for George Washington, who was selected by unanimous acclamation. After Washington, however, factions emerged to contest the election.

Presidential nominations were made by the congressional king caucus, in which factions of legislators in the nation's capitol nominated candidates and coordinated campaign efforts in their respective states. The congressional caucus, however, was problematic for several reasons. One, it violated the constitutional principle of separation of powers, as legislators determined who could become president. Two, the system created a void in geographic areas represented by a legislator of the other party. This system collapsed in 1824, when different factions in Congress nominated four candidates in different sections of the country, none of whom gained a majority in the Electoral College.

Conventions and Primaries

Starting with the 1832 election, political parties have held national conventions to nominate presidential candidates. For over a century, these conventions featured party bosses meeting to negotiate over the nominee, policy agendas, and the spoils of government in the event of victory. Nominations during the caucus-convention system were controlled by state and local party bosses who held sway because they controlled the local caucuses or meetings used to select delegates to state conventions, which in turn selected delegates to the national conventions. Though national in scope, the power was decentralized among the largely autonomous state and local political party organizations. Nominating candidates required building coalitions among the party organizations divided into factions along sectional lines.

The caucus-convention system shifted to a mixed caucus-primary convention system in the early 1900s. Starting in 1912, a few states began holding presidential primaries in which partisans could vote on their party's presidential nominee. Most of these primaries were advisory rather than binding, however, and the selection of most convention delegates continued to be controlled by party establishments at the state and local levels. Still, over time, nonbinding preference primaries began to weigh heavily in the decisions of party bosses, who needed to nominate candidates with mass appeal if they were going to win the general election. By the 1960s, it had become possible for a candidate to actively seek the nomination using primaries to demonstrate their popular support (for example, Kennedy in 1960) or even seize control of the nominating apparatus in the various states by coordinating activists to send candidate-loyal delegates to the conventions (for example, Goldwater in 1964). Power over nominations during this period started to gravitate from party elites to party activists.

Reform

After a divisive and violent convention in 1968, the Democratic Party initiated a series of commissions, beginning with the McGovern-Fraser Committee in 1970, to reform the nomination process. The reforms were intended to make the process more open and participatory and to nominate candidates more representative of party constituencies. Both political parties now use binding presidential primaries and open caucuses to select delegates to the national nominating conventions. The majority of convention delegates are selected in state presidential primaries in which most voters are party identifiers (though some states allow any registered voter to participate). The reformed nomination process shifted control of the nomination from party bosses and insiders to party activists, campaign contributors, and voters in the presidential primaries.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading