Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

ALTHOUGH THE MAJORITY of Americans do not generally consider the environment a top priority in political campaigns, scores of voters, particularly young Americans, are now demanding that politicians pay attention to global warming and climate change. A poll taken by Quinnipiac University in late 2005 revealed that candidates' positions on the environment were the most important issue when voting for a president or member of Congress for one-fourth of all respondents. In the spring of 2007, Greenberg Quinlan Rosner Research, a Democratic polling firm, revealed that 76 percent of Democratic, 59 percent of Independent, and 41 percent of Republican respondents supported proactive positions on global warming. However, only 27 percent of respondents believed that American policies were currently on target. In a close election, environmentalists could determine the outcome of a presidential election. In the 21st century, few politicians can afford to ignore the scientific data on global warming and climate change that has been generated over decades. Even the most casual observer has been made aware that hurricanes are increasing in intensity, glaciers are melting, polar ice caps are shrinking, sea levels are receding, seasons are becoming less distinct from one another, and major heat waves are threatening human and animal life in many areas of the world.

The United States and the Environment

Republican President Richard Nixon began warning Americans about the inherent dangers in overdepen-dence on foreign oil in the late 1960s, and Democrat President limmy Carter unsuccessfully attempted to steer a comprehensive energy plan through Congress during the oil crisis of the 1970s. Although environmental issues were tabled in the 1980s under Ronald Reagan, George H.W. Bush yielded to pressure and signed the Clean Air Act in 1990. Bill Clinton, in part because of the urging of Vice President Al Gore, took a strong stand on environmental issues after being elected in 1992. When George W Bush entered the White House in 2001, however, the environment was again relegated to the back burner, despite the fact that between 1992 and 2004, American oil consumption jumped by 20 percent and carbon dioxide emissions increased by 15 percent.

A report issued in early 2008 placed the United States at the bottom of the Group of 8 and 39th of 149 nations on environmental issues. The rankings were based on assessments of responses and performance in areas such as sanitation, greenhouse gas emissions, agricultural policies, and air pollution. In 2006, a group of scientists, who had become disgusted with the position of the Bush White House on the environment, determined to take a more active role in increasing the importance of environmental issues during future campaigns by offering their support to candidates with strong records of environmental support. Within a year, the group claimed 2,500 members, including John Gibbons and Neal Lane, who had served as science advisors to President Bill Clinton, and eight Nobel laureates. Expressing similar concerns, a group of environmentalists created the nonpartisan website, http://www.greenprimary.org, to provide information about the environmental policies and records of all political candidates and allow voters to ask politicians questions about their stance on environmental issues.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading