Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

African American Studies, Temple University

For 4 years, from 1997 to 2001, an ideological struggle was waged over the philosophical direction of the Department of African American Studies (DAAS) at Temple University (TU) in Philadelphia. The department had gained national and international fame in the late 1980s for its Afrocentric orientation, as well as for being the first program in the country to grant a Ph.D. in African American Studies (AAS), under the leadership of Molefi Kete Asante, the founder of the Afrocentric paradigm. However, the department started drawing negative attention in 1996 when a serious effort was made by a group of white and black professors and administrators to have Molefi Asante's tenure at Temple terminated. They had charged Asante with abuse of power, but the real issue, as was later revealed, was the widespread discussion on campus about the Afrocentric orientation of the department.

The Ford Foundation refused to grant funding to the department, claiming that it was too political. Those who attacked Asante wanted to find a more agreeable black person to run the department. Although their efforts to railroad Asante out of office failed, this was only the first open attack on the department from the Temple administration, to be followed by many more. Asante, whose term was expiring on June 30, 1997, announced during the fall of 1996 that, for personal reasons, he would not seek reelection as chair of the DAAS. The dean, Carolyn Adams, quickly seized this opportunity to attempt to implement a drastic philosophical change in the DAAS. This change, it seems, was to be part of a broad revamping of Temple University's public image, with a serious commitment to luring students from the suburbs. A highly visible DAAS, whose philosophical orientation was perceived as hostile to white supremacy, could have seriously undermined the success of the plan.

An Array of Forces

From the very beginning, Adams engaged in questionable tactics in order to ensure that the next DAAS chair would develop a vision that was appealing to the rest of the university. She took it upon herself to appoint a search committee, made up of Sonia Sanchez (Women's Studies), Sonya Peterson-Lewis (AAS), Trevor Sewell (School of Education), Thaddeus Mathis (Social Work), Nathaniel Norment (AAS), Abu Abarry (AAS), and Kariamu WelshAsante (AAS), who was later replaced, at her own request, by Ama Mazama. Originally chaired by Sanchez, the committee was eventually cochaired by Peterson-Lewis and Sewell. The students also insisted on having a representative and elected Fabanwo Aduana. The latter was only reluctantly accepted by Adams, who proceeded to unilaterally appoint a student who was not elected, Edi Becton.

The search committee appointed by Adams was charged with identifying potential candidates for the position and bringing them to campus. Five candidates were invited in May and June of 1997: Joyce Joyce, Ronald Bailey, Geneva Smitherman, Mary Hoover, and Mwalimu Shujaa. The Union Contract's Article 14, which defines and protects the rights of the Temple faculty, stipulates that it is the faculty's prerogative to recommend a particular candidate to the dean, who may reject or accept the nomination. However, Adams disregarded the contract altogether, and thus violated the DAAS faculty's rights by insisting that the DAAS faculty could only nominate either Joyce Joyce or Ronald Bailey.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading