Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Proposition 227 (California)

Proposition 227 was a voter initiative passed in California in 1998, by a vote of 61% of those who voted. Of the Hispanic voting population, 63% voted against this initiative. Statewide, only the Bay Area's Alameda County (55%) opposed this measure. The proposition, billed as the “English for the Children” initiative, was the first of several attempts—and the first one to succeed—by Ron Unz (its sponsor and chief architect) to alter education policy at the polls using political campaign strategies designed for elections. California is one of only five states where such voter initiatives are permitted by law. This entry summarizes the requirements and intent of that law, viewed by some of its critics as an unorthodox way of determining a curriculum matter normally left to local boards of education.

English for the Children was an antibilingual education campaign mounted in several states. The language of the proposition declared that children were to be taught English through mostly English instruction, given that English was the language of opportunity, advancement, productivity, and literacy. Proponents asserted that California had failed in its venture with bilingual education programs and suffered from high drop-out rates and low literacy levels among its immigrant student populations and that young children deserved to be taught English by being immersed in that language as much as possible. Campaign rhetoric obscured the fact that while much of the underachieve-ment of immigrant children persists, only a portion of those children were actually being instructed bilin-gually. Hence, as opponents of the proposition pointed out, the campaign managed to blame bilingual schooling for problems that were not directly related to it or of its making.

Instructional Program Prescribed by the Proposition

Proposition 227 required that English language learners (ELLs) be placed in English language classrooms that use sheltered English immersion or structured English immersion for 1 year. The two terms are used interchangeably in the proposition and are not uniformly distinguished one from another in the professional literature. According to the proposition, the same English language classroom could have ELLs of different ages and language backgrounds. Further, ELLs could be placed in mainstream classrooms upon acquiring a good working knowledge of the language. Concerning some of the critical components of effective programs for English learners, the proposition made the following points:

  • Teachers' knowledge and use of the English and primary language (LI): The teacher or other instructional staff are to be proficient in English and use English overwhelmingly. There is no mention of the teaching staff's requisite knowledge of the students' LI.
  • Students' knowledge and use of the LI in learning contexts: There is no mention of the students' knowledge or use of the LI.
  • Instructional time in English and in the LI: Nearly all daily instruction is to be done in English.
  • Level of teaching in English: This is to be done in a way that is understandable to English learners. There is no specific reference to the different levels of English learners.
  • Duration: Under normal circumstances, children are to be taught using sheltered English immersion or structured English immersion for 1 year. Students are considered to be ELLs so long as they cannot perform regular mainstream work in English.

Parental Exceptions

According to the proposition, parents can apply for a waiver to the required English programs under three different circumstances: (1) if a child at or below the fifth grade demonstrates grade-level knowledge of English; (2) if the child is at least 10 years old and site personnel (principal and instructional staff) believe the child would benefit from a program other than structured or sheltered English immersion to foster quick development of English language skills (Note: The proposition makes no distinction between English language skills and subject matter knowledge and skills in English, although this distinction is a critical one in practice. This is discussed in work by Grace McField); and (3) if a child has been enrolled in a structured or sheltered English immersion classroom for at least 30 days and the principal and instructional staff determine that due to emotional, psychological, educational, or physical needs, the student would perform better in an alternate instructional setting.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading