Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

The natural approach, described in this entry, is a language-teaching philosophy that incorporates naturalistic principles identified by researchers in second-language acquisition. It espouses second-language acquisition without recourse to native language for support or reliance on grammatical analysis or drilling about the target language. The natural approach is often associated with Tracy Terrell's experiences teaching Spanish in California in the 1970s. Terrell subsequently worked with linguist Stephen Krashen in elaborating a theoretical rationale for the natural approach.

Terrell and Krashen identified the natural approach with an earlier natural method, which was also known as the direct method, a teaching method that predominated in the early 20th century in Europe. The two differ in a number of respects. In the natural method, emphasis was placed on teacher monologues, direct repetition, and formal production of sentences in the target language. In the natural approach, the emphasis is on providing exposure to language through comprehensible inputs, optimizing emotional readiness for learning, and openness to employing written materials and reading as a means to expose learners to the target language.

Similarly to their colleagues in other communicative orientations to language acquisition, Terrell and Krashen rejected the audio-lingual and other earlier methods of language teaching with a grammatical or structural focus. They maintained that the earlier methods were not theoretically grounded in the research knowledge in language acquisition, but in grammatical structure. Unlike their colleagues in the communicative approach, they pay little attention to language theory, other than to maintain that language is a vehicle for communicating meanings and messages.

Rather, Terrell and Krashen focused on language acquisition processes. According to these authors, language consists of lexical items, structures, and messages; grammatical structure does not require explicit attention by the teacher, by the learner, or to the learning materials for language acquisition to occur. Despite their disagreement with the audio-lingual method in general, Terrell and Krashen do share the audio-lingual method's view that learners acquire language via mastery of structures by stages.

Theoretical Framework

Terrell and Krashen's strong applied theoretical base in language acquisition theory, which some refer to as Krashen's language acquisition theory, distinguished the natural approach from other existing second-language learning methods and approaches of the time, which employed linguistics as a predominant theoretical focus. Krashen's language acquisition theory is summarized in a number of hypotheses: (a) the acquisition/learning hypothesis, in which a distinction is made between language acquisition as a natural phenomenon and language learning as one that is taught and learned like any other school subject; (b) the monitor hypothesis, which points out requirements so learners can monitor their learning to improve second-language proficiency; (c) the natural order hypothesis, which maintains that the acquisition of grammatical structures occurs in a predictable order; (d) the input hypothesis, which relates what a learner is exposed to with language acquisition; and (d) the affective filter hypothesis, which argues that the learner's emotional state or emotions can pass, impede, or block input necessary to language acquisition.

The natural approach resembles the communicative approach in that it offers a general set of principles that apply to a variety of teaching and learning situations, depending on student's needs, interests, and the level of skill brought in the target language. Instructional arrangements are approached from two points of view. First are typical goals, such as the development of personal and academic communication skills orally and in writing. These goals may also be expressed as situations, functions, and topics. Second, Krashen and Terrell maintained that purposes of language courses tend to vary, depending on students' needs and interests, and as such are inconsistent with the prescription for instructional arrangements made by the first perspective. It is difficult to specify communicative goals that fit all students' needs. Nonetheless, content selection should aim to reduce the affective filter through interesting content and a friendly, nonthreatening learning environment. Instructional arrangements should provide broad exposure to vocabulary useful to basic personal communication and resist focusing on grammatical structures. Mastery of grammatical structures will emerge naturally through their incorporation in a variety of communicative topics and functions over time.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading