Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

In dealing with educational language rights in the United States, it is useful to make a distinction between the right to access education and the right to an education in one's mother tongue(s). For language minority students, both rights are important for participation in the broader society and staying connected with their home/community language. According to Reynaldo Macias, two basic rights exist: (1) the right to freedom from discrimination on the basis of language, and (2) the right to use one's language in the activities of communal life. There is no legally protected right to choice of language except as it flows from these two rights in combination with other rights, such as due process, equal enforcement of the laws, and so on.

In the United States and other Western countries, rights are usually located in the individual rather than in groups, explains Macias. In international law, all the existing rights are individual rights and freedoms, although their manifestations may involve more than one individual, according to Fernand de Varennes. The idea of language rights generally means something different than freedom of speech. Language rights around the world frequently are ignored in the formulation of educational policies. Unfortunately, even though organizations such as the United Nations have passed resolutions supporting the right of children to instruction in their native languages, member nations, including the United States, do not act on them because these resolutions are not binding, clarifies Tove Skutnabb-Kangas.

In the United States, language rights are largely derived from their association with other constitutional protections, which are also linked to race, religion, and national origin. Bill Piatt argues that some accommodations for the use of minority languages have been made in some legal cases dealing with educational, economic, and political access; the recognition of language rights generally and linguistic accommodations, therefore are on a tenuous legal foundation. This entry describes the orientations and implications of language policies, their historical context, and key court decisions relating to educational language policies.

Policy Orientations and their Implications

Language policies have a direct effect on language rights. In considering policies, it is useful to note their functions in either promoting or restricting rights. Traditionally, many scholars—such as Heinz Kloss, for example—limited their analyses to formal policies, or explicit language laws. Language rights in practice are also shaped by implicit/covert policies as well as by informal practices that can have the same or even greater force than official policies. Implicit policies include those that overtly start out to be language policies but have the effect of policy. Arnold Leibowitz explains that covert policies, as the word implies, are more menacing because they use English language or literacy requirements as a means of barring someone from social, political, educational, or economic participation.

Promotion-oriented policies are those that use the resources of the government to advance a language. Historically, by the 1920s, English had been officially designated as the language of schooling in the majority of states. Even before the official designation of English, most language resources have flowed primarily into English instruction. The federal and state governments have rarely tried to promote languages other than English in education, except for purposes of strategic national self-interest or defense. A recent exception has been the Native American Languages Preservation Act of 2006 (H. R. 4766, 109th Congress), which has authorized funds for the promotion of threatened languages. More typically, governmental educational policies of the past several decades only have sought to assist in communicating with non-English-speaking populations through expediency-oriented accommodations. These are also used when, as Kloss notes, the government/state sees a need to communicate with speakers of minority languages to provide a bridge between minority populations.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading