Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Language Acquisition Device

How children learn to speak and understand a language has long intrigued linguists and psychologists. Many different theories of this process, called first-language acquisition, have been proposed, often in response to existing theories. These theories can generally be grouped under four broad headings: behav-ioralism, innatism, developmental psychology, and interactionism. The innatist approach to first-language acquisition posits that language learning is an internal process and that children are biologically endowed with the innate ability to learn language. The concept of a language acquisition device (LAD) is largely responsible for this process and is a part of the brain specifically designed for language learning. This entry describes the historical context for LAD, how it works, its role in second-language acquisition, and criticisms of this concept.

Historical Context

Noam Chomsky originally proposed the existence of the (virtual, not physical) LAD in developing his theories of syntax and universal grammar (UG) during the late 1950s and early 1960s. Chomsky was working in response to B. F. Skinner's behavioralist theories of language acquisition, which assumed that language was learned through imitation, habit formation, and reinforcement. In behavioralism, language learning is a process external to the child where the environment provides everything necessary for language acquisition. In contrast to this, Chomsky asserted that humans are biologically endowed with an innate mechanism for learning language, and that the environment provides language as input to the language-learning process. The child, using the LAD, processes that input and gradually acquires adult-like knowledge of a language. This process is largely subconscious and is automatic, much like learning to walk.

Chomsky's use of language refers to the syntax, or structure, of a language, rather than to its functions and social uses. Similarly, grammar is the set of rules for a language that allow any and all sentences in that language to be produced and understood, rather than the traditional prescriptive grammar learned in school (e.g., “ain't” is bad English).

How the LAD Works

The LAD is frequently referred to as an organ, although it resides in and is an inseparable part of the human brain. This reflects a modular understanding of both language learning and the mind, indicating that language learning is different from other types of learning (e.g., learning to add and subtract) and that the LAD is only used for language acquisition. The LAD contains the cognitive tools necessary for learning a language as a child, which include UG, and is the primary means of analyzing language input.

Universal Grammar (UG)

UG is the set of principles and parameters that constrain the possibilities of the language(s) being learned. These principles and parameters are universal to all languages (hence, Universal Grammar) and are innate. Principles are fundamental characteristics of language and grammar, for instance that language is rule-governed, whereas parameters are options for particular features of language. Parameters serve almost as templates, which are used to analyze language input to determine whether the language being learned allows certain features. A parameter can be understood as a toggle switch that starts off in the neutral central position and then gets flipped to the appropriate up or down position based on language evidence. One example of a parameter would be whether a language allows what is called a “null subject.” Some languages, such as Spanish and Italian, allow both Maria speaks French and [she] speaks French, where the [she] is understood but not spoken (Habla francés with no explicit subject would be understood and accepted as a grammatical Spanish sentence). English only allows Maria speaks French, and [she] speaks French, where the [she] is null, is immediately recognizable as an ungrammatical English sentence (Speaks French, omitting the subject, is not recognized as a full sentence). Accordingly, a child learning English would flip the null subject parameter to “no,” making it easier for her LAD to remember that English does not allow null subjects.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading