Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

English immersion, an approach to teaching English by providing instruction solely through English, holds considerable appeal in the American imagination. Surely, the best way to learn a language is to immerse oneself in it, many believe, and the more deeply and thoroughly the immersion, the more quickly the language will be learned. Several states, such as California, Arizona, and Massachusetts, have adopted laws mandating English immersion for all children who do not know English. Many proponents of English immersion cite studies of French immersion programs in Canada to support laws mandating English immersion. But what is language immersion, and how does it work?

Immersion Programs for English-Speaking Children

Language immersion programs for English-speaking children, in which students learn a new language as they study academic subject matter through the new language and through English, have been established as highly effective. After 6 years in such a program, English-speaking children can be expected to perform at or above grade level in their academic work and can typically read, write, and speak a foreign language. In the French programs in Quebec that are often cited, children receive 90% to 100% of immersion language instruction the first year, which then decreases yearly while instruction through English increases, until the proportion reaches 50/50 by fifth or sixth grade. Parents are cautioned that they must expect their children to remain in these programs for a minimum of 6 years, because learning a new language takes many years. Despite the lengthy time commitment, immersion programs appeal strongly to English-speaking parents who are eager for their children to attain fluency and literacy in another language as an educational enrichment.

English Immersion in the United States

English immersion, as it is implemented in the United States, follows a different approach. Supporters of English immersion argue that young children can learn English quickly and easily and can then turn their attention to academic learning. In California, Arizona, and Massachusetts, where English immersion has been legally mandated, children are expected to learn English within 1 year and then exit the program. When pressed for evidence to support the use of this 1-year, monolingual program model, English immersion advocates typically cite the success of the 6-year, bilingual immersion programs. Conflating these two very different programs leads to considerable confusion over the education of English language learners (ELLs).

The controversy surrounding the best ways to educate ELLs is not likely to be resolved merely by clarifying the pedagogical differences between foreign-language immersion programs and the English immersion programs as currently implemented. Nevertheless, a clear understanding of what immersion is and how it is meant to work constitutes an essential first step.

“Sink or Swim” versus Structured Immersion

When schools provide no services to students struggling to learn English, placing them in classrooms alongside English-speaking students, some ELLs can eventually learn English and recover academically, while others cannot. Such a lack of support is termed a “sink or swim” approach and was common before the Supreme Court's Lau v. Nichols decision of 1974, which required schools to provide support for ELLs. Early advocates of English immersion in the United States had noticed the success of French immersion programs for English-speaking children and recognized that French immersion was not “sink or swim,” but rather had a very clear structure.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading