Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Designation and Redesignation of English Language Learners

For the past 40 years, educators have used a categorical scheme to label linguistically and culturally diverse students through their years of schooling. Typically, though not uniformly, a three-part system has been institutionalized by states and school districts; namely, those students who (1) are non-English proficient, thus considered English language learners (ELLs), who qualify for language support services; (2) have changed their status to redesignated English language learners, once having attained English language proficiency; or (3) have been deemed English proficient, upon initial entry into a school district, and are able to participate in general education classes without language support.

Table 1 shows the relationships between these categories.

This designation system, intended to assist educators in the allocation and provision of appropriate educational services for linguistically and culturally diverse students, has been fraught with controversy. Issues include its fairness and equity, the fear that students are being denied opportunities to learn, erratic funding formulae for language support services, and the design and implementation of best practices. This entry describes the criteria associated with each of the categories, and data used in the decision-making process. The reader is cautioned that from district to district and state to state, these descriptions may vary slightly.

Table 1 Identifying and Redesignating English Language Learners in Illinois, Pre- and Post-No Child Left Behind (NCLB)
Identifying English language learnersRedesignating English language learners: Monitoring annual progressRedesignating English language learners as language minority students
Required Measures Pre-NCLBHome Language SurveyNationally norm-referenced language proficiency tool in English, grade levels K-12 (L, S, R, W)50th percentile on a nationally norm-referenced English language proficiency test
Nationally norm-referenced language proficiency tool in English, grade levels K-12 (L, S, R, W)Illinois Measure of Annual Growth in English (IMAGE-grades 3–11; R, W), the state's English language proficiency test
Required Measures Post-NCLBHome Language SurveyAssessing Comprehension and Communication in English State to State for English Language Learners (ACCESS for ELLs®, grade levels K-12), the state's English language proficiency testComposite score of English language proficiency level 4, Expanding, on ACCESS for ELLs
WIDA-ACCESS Placement Test (W-APT), grade levels K-12 (L, S, R, W)Illinois Measure of Annual Growth in English (IMAGE-grades 3–11), the state's test of academic achievement for English language learners

Eligibility Requirements for Special Services: Identifying ELLs

Historically, a national consensus has never been reached regarding the definition of English language learners or the counterpart legal term, limited-English-proficient students. The 2001 reauthorization of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act, commonly known as the No Child Left Behind Act, provides broad guidelines toward reaching a common understanding: ELLs are elementary or secondary school students, aged 3 through 21, not born in the United States or whose native language is other than English. According to Part A, Section 9101 of the act, these students' non-English home environment has significantly affected their level of English language proficiency so that their speaking, reading, writing, or understanding of English may affect “their ability to meet the State's proficient level of achievement on State assessments, or ability to successfully achieve in classrooms where the language of instruction is English.”

These general descriptive criteria, provided at a federal level, produce many different interpretations across states and the outer territories of the United States. These variations in defining ELLs can be attributed to many factors. Such differences emanate from the following factors: (a) use of various language proficiency instruments, (b) the varied cut-scores of these measures, (c) state expectations of student progress and attainment of English language proficiency, (d) the amount of time (in years) allowed for language support, and (e) the financial backing states are willing to bear.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading