Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Biculturalism is the ability to effectively navigate day-to-day life in two different social groups and to do so with the anticipated result of being accepted by the cultural group that is not one's own. As human beings live and work in shared spaces, their common experiences produce a set of values and behavioral standards, communicative and cognitive codes, as well as worldviews and beliefs. Taken together, these are the elements of culture—a dynamic, shared, interwoven system of ideas and actions that mediate our choices, values, and actions in our day-to-day lives. Unlike human emotions (e.g., love, hate), which are static and universal, culture is dynamic because it changes with time and space as well as membership. Biculturalism refers to the necessary knowledge, skills, and beliefs that individuals can access to participate within their own and another cultural group.

Societal Biculturalism

At the state or macrolevel, biculturalism suggests that two cultures merit formal recognition. According to Carol Ware, the term first appeared in The Cultural Approach to History and subsequently in journal articles of the 1950s that discussed struggles between Canadian Francophones and Anglophones. After a national or ethnic conflict in which neither faction completely conquers or overpowers the other, a process ensues to accommodate the two opposing ways of existence. One way this is accomplished is through language policy. Such policies create official domains for language use or diglossia. In colonized countries like India, with dozens of local languages, the end of British colonial control presented the opportunity for language planning and the creation of an official (de jure) language policy. This excerpt from the Constitution of India (November 26, 1949) is an example:

345. Official language or languages of a State.—Subject to the provisions of articles 346 and 347, the Legislature of a State may by law adopt any one or more of the languages in use in the State or Hindi as the language or languages to be used for all or any of the official purposes of that State… Provided that, until the Legislature of the State otherwise provides by law, the English language shall continue to be used for those official purposes within the State.

In the absence of an official policy, groups of language speakers often create a de facto language policy to demarcate the accepted domains for a particular language. While the possibility exists to use either of one's available languages in a given domain, there is an implicit understanding shared by members of the bicultural society that one language is more appropriate than the other. Such domains include religious activity, education, family interactions, government correspondence, and banking transactions.

Societal biculturalism can also be seen through religious practices. At times, the beliefs of a recently arriving group may violate the norms and traditions of those who lived there before. The case of American Indians is an illustrative example. Federal laws and policies of the United States frequently violated the beliefs and religious practices of the various native groups. Such policies prohibited access to sacred native religious sites or sanctioned the possession of animal-derived sacred objects. Outsiders were able to desecrate sacred native burial sites with impunity. In 1978, the U.S. Congress passed the American Indian Religious Freedom Act (AIRFA) to provide some protection for the religious practices that were an integral part of American Indian culture. The act reads in

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading