Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Self-Concepts and Self-Esteem, Children and Adolescents

“Am I me?” a thoughtful 2-year-old queried of his parents. Beginning in the second year of life, toddlers begin to talk about themselves. They master self-relevant personal pronouns (I and me) that distinguish them from others. With development, they come to understand that they possess various characteristics, some of which may be positive (“I'm smart”), and some of which may be negative (“I'm unpopular”). Of particular interest is how the very nature of such self-evaluations changes with development and differs between individual children and adolescents across two basic evaluative categories. The first category is domain-specific self-concepts, namely, how one judges one's attributes in particular arenas (e.g., scholastic competence, social acceptance, physical competence, and so forth). A given individual may vary tremendously in how he or she feels across these domains, creating a meaningful profile of scores. One typically does not feel equally adequate across all domains. The second evaluative category is global self-esteem, namely, how much an individual values his or her overall worth as a person (for a complete treatment of self-development in childhood and adolescence, see Harter, 1999).

Table 1 Developmental Changes in the Nature of Self-Evaluative Statements Across Different Domains
DomainsEarly Childhood Specific BehaviorsLater Childhood Generalizations*Adolescence Abstractions*
Scholastic competenceI know my A, B, CsI'm smart in schoolI'm intelligent
Athletic competenceI can run very fastI'm good at sportsI'm athletically talented
Social competenceI'm nice to my friend JasonIt's easy for me to make friendsI'm popular
Behavioral conductI don't hit my sisterI'm well behavedI think of myself as a moral person
Physical appearanceI have pretty blond hairI'm good-lookingI'm physically attractive
*Examples in the table represent positive self-evaluations. However, during later childhood and adolescence, negative judgments are also observed.

Developmental shifts in the nature of self-evaluations are driven by changes in the child's cognitive capabilities. Cognitive-developmental theory and findings (see Fischer, 1980; Piaget, 1962) alert us to the fact that the young child is limited to very specific, concrete representations of self and others, for example, “I know my A, B, Cs” (see also Harter, 1999). In middle to later childhood, the ability develops to form higher-order concepts about one's attributes and abilities (e.g., “I'm smart”). There are further cognitive advances at adolescence, allowing the teenager to form abstract concepts about the self that transcend concrete behavioral manifestations and higher-order generalizations (e.g., “I'm intelligent”).

Developmental Differences in Domain-Specific Self-Concepts

Domain-specific self-concepts are observed at every developmental level. However, the precise nature of these judgments varies with age (see Table 1). In Table 1, five common domains in which children and adolescents make evaluative judgments about the self are identified: scholastic competence, physical competence, social competence, behavioral conduct, and physical appearance. The types of statements vary, however, across three age periods, early childhood, later childhood, and adolescence, in keeping with the cognitive abilities and limitations of each age period.

Early Childhood

Young children provide very concrete accounts of their capabilities, evaluating specific behaviors. Thus, they communicate how they know their A, B, Cs, how they can run very fast, how they are nice to a particular friend, how they don't hit their sister, and how they possess a specific physical feature, such as pretty blond hair. Of particular interest in such accounts is the fact that the young child typically provides a litany of virtues touting his or her positive skills and attributes. One cognitive limitation of this age period is that the young child cannot distinguish the wish to be competent from reality. As a result, children typically overestimate their abilities because they do not yet have the skills to evaluate themselves realistically. Another cognitive characteristic that contributes to potential distortions is the pervasiveness of allor-none thinking. That is, evaluations are either all-positive or all-negative. With regard to self-evaluations, they are typically all-positive. (Exceptions to this positivity bias can be observed in children who are chronically abused, since severe maltreatment is often accompanied by parental messages that make the child feel inadequate, incompetent, and unlovable. Such children will also engage in all-or-none thinking concluding that they are all-bad.)

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading