Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

In 1983, the National Commission on Excellence in Education published a report called A Nation at Risk, which has had a significant impact on education and educational reform since then. The report documented 18 months spent assessing the quality of teaching and learning in the nation's public and private educational institutions. Based on their evaluation, these educators concluded that our nation was “at risk” with respect to education. Similarly, in 1984, a team of 60 educators studied more than 1,000 classrooms in 38 schools across the country. Both reports included recommendations for the improvement of educational leadership, curriculum development, teacher training, time utilization, governmental commitment, and upgrading expectations for learners (Wessel, 1986).

As a result of these two documents, the 1980s became a decade characterized by sweeping educational reform that lasted well into the 1990s. With the passage of the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, the 21st century has opened with calls for greater accountability by schools and effective teaching methods. To achieve these goals, school personnel must engage in productive evaluation of their institutional strengths and weakness and in collaborative efforts to foster school change.

To accomplish this, school faculty and administration often engage in leadership and school improvement activities in forums such as staff meetings and retreats. In many cases, they are in need of assistance in the facilitation of these types of activities. As such, school consultants with training in applied developmental science can play an important role in facilitating this process.

School Improvement through Staff Collaboration and Staff-Initiated Organizational Change

Lambert (1998) stated that the most successful schools are those that use restructuring tools to help them function as professional communities. In these organizations, teachers work toward a shared goal, involving collaborative and cooperative efforts. These teachers also consider themselves to be members of a team that are collectively responsible for the learning of their students. Teachers are more likely to change the way they work in classrooms and continually improve their practice if they are supported in their own working environment by a group of colleagues who engage in professional development activities and by a culture that values collaboration, distributed leadership, and continuous improvement (Johnson, 1999).

The term leadership often evokes images of an authority figure, and thoughts of certain qualities such as “powerful,” “strong,” and “dominant” often come to mind (Lambert, 1998). In schools, the leader is usually equated with the principal, because there is a frequent tendency among school staff members to defer to or depend on the principal and/or other administrative figures with respect to decision-making issues. In addition, some administrative figures demand and need complete control over their systems and are reluctant to relinquish any part of them to their staffs. Gardner (1990), as cited in Powell (1993), however, conceptualizes leadership as the ability to inspire and motivate others to dedicate time and energy toward the achievement of goals, rather than controlling everything on one's own. Educational leadership occurs when there is learning. Learning happens when the principal and teachers in a school are willing to work together and instruct themselves and each other through continuous reflection, self-analysis, and constructive feedback (S. Powell, personal communication, June 2000).

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading