Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

Positive Youth Development, Service-Learning versus Community-Collaborative Models

From its birth in 1862, the tripartite mission of the American land grant university has been teaching, research, and service (Bonnen, 1998; Enerson, 1989). Today, these three missions are embraced by all universities, public and private. However, in the last decade, service has been reconceptualized by many academic leaders as outreach to or, when a more integrated, systemic model is adopted, engagement with communities (Kellogg Commission, 1999; Lerner & Simon, 1998). In part, these revised views of service have been based on the belief that a fundamental purpose of universities is to improve the lives of children, families, and communities (Spanier, 1999) and that such a contribution may frame the knowledge generation, transmission, preservation, and application functions of universities (Boyer, 1990; Lerner & Simon, 1998; Ostrander, 2003).

Universities have addressed the challenge of linking faculty scholarship and student education and improving the lives of children, families, and communities by attempting to integrate the traditional three parts of the mission of higher education. By building and enacting models through which this integration may occur, universities and communities may collaborate to facilitate the translation of university-developed knowledge into policies and programs of meaning and value to the community (Ostrander, 2003).

A key issue that arises in the enactment of this integrative, collaborative agenda is the specification of models that may be used by universities to pursue all components of their mission in manners that are valued by both campus and community. In many instances, the concept of “service learning” is used to frame the model or means used to integrate campus and community (Kenny, Simon, Kiley-Brabeck, & Lerner, 2002a).

Service Learning

The service-learning approach involves the idea that college students will learn valuable lessons by engaging in community service that, as well, adds value to the life of the community (Kenny & Gallagher, 2002; Kenny, Simon, Kiley-Brabeck, & Lerner, 2002b). Although there is considerable variation in the operationalization of the service-learning concept (Kenny et al., 2002a, 2002b), all instantiations share several fundamental concepts. First among these is a need for the university to enhance its relevance and connectedness to the issues and problems faced by the broader society. Enhancing faculty and student enthusiasm for teaching and learning, the conceptual basis of service learning is that it will facilitate the evolution of what was historically the focus of university-based scholarship, that is, decontextualized theoretical knowledge, into more community contingent (i.e., relational) and dynamic knowledge developed in relation to practice (Lerner & Simon, 1998; Ostrander, 2001, 2003).

Second, there is a belief that service learning contributes to the personal development of students as well as to the quality of life in the community in a way that is not possible through campus-centered learning (Kenny & Gallagher, 2002). Arguing that service learning promotes civic responsibility, this perspective contends that community mentors for undergraduates enhance students' knowledge about translating scholarship into practice (Kenny & Gallagher, 2002). In addition, there is the belief that energetic and eager volunteers provide manpower to assist community endeavors (Kenny & Gallagher, 2002). From this perspective, service learning offers a forum for the interaction of diverse populations and enriches faculty-student and “town-gown” relations.

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading