Skip to main content icon/video/no-internet

The indigenous population of Alaska consists of diverse groups of people. Prior to the arrival of Europeans, Alaska Natives had certain characteristics in common; they were extremely well adapted to the harsh arctic and subarctic environment and prospered in small, subsistence-based communities. However, these people were largely heterogeneous and differed in physical traits, language, culture, and social organization. According to anthropologist Ernest S. Burch Jr. (1991), “One should speak in the plural—of Alaska Native histories, not of Alaska Native history” (cited in McBeath & Morehouse, 1994, p. 31). The idea of Alaska Natives as a single group is largely an artifact of Western colonization but has became increasingly appropriate because of their shared history of social problems due to contact with Russians and European Americans and the laws and policies pertaining to these peoples as a whole.

Ethnographical Overview

In broadest terms, Alaska Natives comprise Indian and Eskimo peoples. The Indian peoples were the first to migrate to Alaska and primarily settled in the interior and along the south-central and southeastern coast. Because these regions differ substantially in terms of climate, topography, and natural resources, the Native groups who occupied them developed distinct cultures and societal structures.

The Athapaskan Indians who settled the interior were the most nomadic of all Alaskan people. Because of the natural barriers, the limited natural resources, and the harsh climate in this region, the Athapaskans lived in small, scattered groups of several nuclear families. Although Athapaskans shared a similar language and culture and would occasionally form larger groups for specific tasks, such as caribou hunting or warfare, they had no tribal organization and only a limited tribal identity (Naske & Slotnick, 1979). Due to the challenging natural environment and limited social structures, Athapaskan culture placed a greater emphasis on individual skills and behavior. Positions of leadership were acquired through demonstrations of individual abilities, rather than inherited, and Athapaskan religion usually involved individual, rather than community, rites. Tanaina Athapaskans primarily settled along the south-central coast, in the Cook Inlet–Susitna River basin, and consequently developed somewhat differently. Influenced by Eskimos to their west, these Indians lived in relatively permanent villages, hunted sea mammals, and adopted elements of other coastal cultures.

Unlike the Athapaskans, Indians in the southeast had a plethora of natural resources available. Consequently, they were mostly sedentary and lived in larger, highly structured societies. Today, the most numerous of these people are the Haida, Tlingit, and Tsimshian. Communities were organized around common matrilineal ancestry and stratified into a flexible system of classes, such as nobles, commoners, and slaves. Haida and Tlingit societies were divided into moieties, or parts, and marriages were arranged between individuals belonging to opposite moieties. Tlingit communities were further subdivided into clans, or nuclei of matrilineally related males. Each such clan was an independent social and political unit with its own ceremonies, crests, and claims to hunting and fishing grounds. Lineage was central to Tlingit culture. It was the basis for greater alliances between clans, an integral aspect of their religion, and was commemorated with ornate totem poles (Naske & Slotnick, 1979).

...

  • Loading...
locked icon

Sign in to access this content

Get a 30 day FREE TRIAL

  • Watch videos from a variety of sources bringing classroom topics to life
  • Read modern, diverse business cases
  • Explore hundreds of books and reference titles

Sage Recommends

We found other relevant content for you on other Sage platforms.

Loading